Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#20483 closed defect (fixed)
some more future division in quadratic_form
Reported by:  chapoton  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage7.2 
Component:  quadratic forms  Keywords:  python3 
Cc:  tscrim, jdemeyer  Merged in:  
Authors:  Frédéric Chapoton  Reviewers:  Jeroen Demeyer 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  01c31fb (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  01c31fba5ecd0a3849b823f4756c26877af9ca45 
Dependencies:  #20485  Stopgaps: 
Description
as in #20471, trying to prepare for python3 by correcting some divisions.
plus also the same kind of thing in a custom matrix ascii art in numerical
Change History (18)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by
 Branch set to u/chapoton/20483
 Cc tscrim jdemeyer added
 Commit set to 43afbe1df1cbd2d52450b859c8f85d0781e12edd
 Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by
I slightly prefer QQ((1,2))
over QQ.one()/2
.
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by
 Commit changed from 43afbe1df1cbd2d52450b859c8f85d0781e12edd to 019386abb6b7067f762b08dae7ab844613242af4
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by
 Dependencies set to #20485
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
I suggest to remove the change to the dim()
call and use #20485 instead.
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by
Another detail: better write QQ((1, 2))
instead of QQ((1, 2))
and add a doctest for zeta__exact(0)
.
comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by
 Commit changed from 019386abb6b7067f762b08dae7ab844613242af4 to ecd2139a41ace13330e214b23a21d14a43a0b96a
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
ecd2139  assuming now that self.dim is a sage integer (done in another ticket)

comment:7 Changed 6 years ago by
 Commit changed from ecd2139a41ace13330e214b23a21d14a43a0b96a to 035fdf8d4521974553255a0c8cdccf20d447ac42
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
035fdf8  adding doctest for zeta_exact(0)

comment:8 Changed 6 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:9 Changed 6 years ago by
ping ?
comment:10 Changed 6 years ago by
 Reviewers set to Jeroen Demeyer
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
I see patchbot failures...
comment:11 Changed 6 years ago by
Hang on, I'm working on a fix.
comment:12 followup: ↓ 13 Changed 6 years ago by
patchbot failures are coming from the dependency being not integrated in the branch
comment:13 in reply to: ↑ 12 Changed 6 years ago by
Replying to chapoton:
patchbot failures are coming from the dependency being not integrated in the branch
That's not completely true. Some are, but some are really genuine failures.
comment:14 Changed 6 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/chapoton/20483 to u/jdemeyer/20483
comment:15 Changed 6 years ago by
 Commit changed from 035fdf8d4521974553255a0c8cdccf20d447ac42 to 01c31fba5ecd0a3849b823f4756c26877af9ca45
comment:16 Changed 6 years ago by
Rebased on top of #20485 and added one commit. If you're happy with this commit, you can set it to positive_review.
comment:18 Changed 6 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/jdemeyer/20483 to 01c31fba5ecd0a3849b823f4756c26877af9ca45
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
New commits:
more work on future of division in py3