Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #20402, comment 31


Ignore:
Timestamp:
04/26/16 10:33:31 (3 years ago)
Author:
stumpc5
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #20402, comment 31

    initial v1  
    22> In any cases, we should keep consistency with Weyl groups. It's currently `w.action(l)` there (not `w.act(l)` btw); if we switch to `_act_on_`, then we should do it consistently everywhere.
    33
    4 Term-wise, I think that `w` acts on `l`, while there is an action of `W` on `l`. But I am equally okay to use ``w.action(l)`` for consistency.
     4Term-wise, I think that `w` acts on `l`, while there is an action of `W` on `l`. But I am equally okay to use `w.action(l)` for consistency.
    55
    66I don't get your point of switching: what is wrong with having the method `action` and then using this method in the body of `_act_on_`?