Opened 4 years ago
Closed 16 months ago
#20180 closed defect (wontfix)
Bug: is_locally_represented_number_at_place returns incorrect value
Reported by: | annahaensch | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | quadratic forms | Keywords: | bug |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
Sorry this bug report is a bit ad hoc, but I suspect the thing that makes this buggy is part of a larger problem in the quadratic forms module. I'm running Sage 6.9 and I get the following in error if I construct the quadratic form
M=QuadraticForm(ZZ,3,[75,120,120,144,0,144])
then
sage: M.is_locally_represented_number_at_place(99,3) False
and
sage: M.representation_number_list(100)[99]==0 False
But of course if I represent 99 over the integers, then I have to represent it locally. In this case the second output it correct, and the first one is incorrect. I think there is some underlying problem with the way global quadratic forms are defined.
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by
Hey, I don't know what happened, but I didn't change this.
comment:4 Changed 19 months ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-7.1 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
duplicate of #23412, please close
comment:5 Changed 19 months ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:6 Changed 16 months ago by
- Resolution set to wontfix
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
closing positively reviewed duplicates
This is a duplicate of #23412 and can be closed