Opened 7 years ago
Closed 21 months ago
#19220 closed task (invalid)
Archive superseded/broken old-style packages
Reported by: | jhpalmieri | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | website/wiki | Keywords: | |
Cc: | schilly, leif | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | Travis Scrimshaw | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | #19187 | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
The following packages should be removed or moved to "archive":
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/beautifulsoup-3.2.1.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/biopython-1.61.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/brian-1.4.1.p0.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/coxeter3-1.1.spkg (#19178)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/cunningham_tables-1.0.spkg (broken, see #15813)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/database_jones_numfield-v4.spkg (#19174)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/database_kohel-20060803.spkg (broken, #21086)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/guppy-0.1.8.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/kash3-2008-07-31.p0.spkg (binary)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/lie-2.2.2.p5.spkg (#19176)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/mpi4py-1.2.2.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/ore_algebra-0.2.spkg (#19175)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/p_group_cohomology-2.1.4.p1.spkg (broken, #18514)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/pybtex-20120618.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/pyx-0.10.spkg (broken, #21076)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/qhull-2010.1.spkg (#21143)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/sip-4.13.2.p0.spkg (#21087)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/TOPCOM-0.17.4.spkg (#15302)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/trac-0.11.5.p0.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/cmake-2.4.8.spkg (#18078)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/meataxe-2.4.3.spkg (#12103)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/polymake-2.2.p5.spkg (#20892)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/pynifti-p0.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/qepcad-1.50.spkg (#10224)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/sip-4.9.3.spkg (more recent in optional)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/soya-0.11.2.p0.spkg (broken)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/soya_cvs-2006.05.09.spkg (broken)
Later (depending on non-merged tickets):
Change History (38)
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by
Cc: | schilly added |
---|---|
Component: | packages: optional → website/wiki |
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Summary: | Archive the old TOPCOM package → Archive superseded packages |
comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:8 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Type: | defect → task |
I think this will serve as a good metaticket.
comment:9 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Summary: | Archive superseded packages → Archive superseded/broken packages |
comment:10 Changed 7 years ago by
Please don't add non-merged tickets unless the old package was broken anyway.
comment:11 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:12 follow-up: 14 Changed 7 years ago by
Presumably this should happen after a stable release of the new pip stuff, though?
comment:13 Changed 7 years ago by
Dependencies: | → #19187 |
---|
comment:14 Changed 7 years ago by
comment:15 follow-up: 17 Changed 7 years ago by
Hi, I could move those spkgs any time, but I have no idea about the implications.
comment:16 Changed 7 years ago by
Since the old TOPCOM
has been superseded by a new-style topcom
, I believe it's safe to archive that one.
comment:17 Changed 7 years ago by
Replying to schilly:
Hi, I could move those spkgs any time, but I have no idea about the implications.
Perhaps it should be done after the release of Sage 6.9 stable? That would be a good time.
comment:20 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Summary: | Archive superseded/broken packages → Archive superseded/broken old-style packages |
comment:21 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:22 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:23 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Milestone: | sage-6.9 → sage-7.3 |
comment:24 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:25 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:26 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:27 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:28 Changed 7 years ago by
Soya does not support Python 2 anymore (see http://www.lesfleursdunormal.fr/static/informatique/soya3d/index_en.html). Moreover, it now exists on PyPI: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Soya3/
What is the subtle difference between the packages soya
and soya_cvs
?
comment:29 Changed 7 years ago by
Cc: | leif added |
---|
comment:30 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:31 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:32 Changed 7 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:33 Changed 6 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:34 Changed 6 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:35 Changed 3 years ago by
See also #29289 - Remove support for old-style SPKGs, deprecated in Sage 6.9
comment:36 Changed 23 months ago by
Authors: | John Palmieri |
---|---|
Milestone: | sage-7.3 → sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Priority: | critical → major |
Status: | new → needs_review |
I think we can close this ticket. These download locations are no longer advertised on our webpage.
comment:37 Changed 23 months ago by
Reviewers: | → Travis Scrimshaw |
---|---|
Status: | needs_review → positive_review |
I agree.
comment:38 Changed 21 months ago by
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | positive_review → closed |
Do anybody know whether creating Trac tickets is the proper procedure to deal with old spkgs?