Opened 7 years ago

Closed 19 months ago

#19220 closed task (invalid)

Archive superseded/broken old-style packages

Reported by: John Palmieri Owned by:
Priority: major Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Component: website/wiki Keywords:
Cc: Harald Schilly, Leif Leonhardy Merged in:
Authors: Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A Work issues:
Branch: Commit:
Dependencies: #19187 Stopgaps:

Status badges

Description (last modified by Jeroen Demeyer)

The following packages should be removed or moved to "archive":

Later (depending on non-merged tickets):

Change History (38)

comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Cc: Harald Schilly added
Component: packages: optionalwebsite/wiki

comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Do anybody know whether creating Trac tickets is the proper procedure to deal with old spkgs?

comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)
Summary: Archive the old TOPCOM packageArchive superseded packages

comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:8 Changed 7 years ago by Travis Scrimshaw

Description: modified (diff)
Type: defecttask

I think this will serve as a good metaticket.

comment:9 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)
Summary: Archive superseded packagesArchive superseded/broken packages

comment:10 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Please don't add tickets which don't have positive review yet unless the old package was broken anyway.

Last edited 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer (previous) (diff)

comment:11 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:12 Changed 7 years ago by Karl-Dieter Crisman

Presumably this should happen after a stable release of the new pip stuff, though?

comment:13 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Dependencies: #19187

comment:14 in reply to:  12 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Replying to kcrisman:

Presumably this should happen after a stable release of the new pip stuff, though?

You're right. Although I don't know if it will happen at all, see 2

comment:15 Changed 7 years ago by Harald Schilly

Hi, I could move those spkgs any time, but I have no idea about the implications.

comment:16 Changed 7 years ago by John Palmieri

Since the old TOPCOM has been superseded by a new-style topcom, I believe it's safe to archive that one.

comment:17 in reply to:  15 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Replying to schilly:

Hi, I could move those spkgs any time, but I have no idea about the implications.

Perhaps it should be done after the release of Sage 6.9 stable? That would be a good time.

comment:18 Changed 7 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Sage 6.9 has been released.

comment:19 Changed 7 years ago by John Palmieri

Is there any reason not to move these spkgs now?

comment:20 Changed 6 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)
Summary: Archive superseded/broken packagesArchive superseded/broken old-style packages

comment:21 Changed 6 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:22 Changed 6 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:23 Changed 6 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)
Milestone: sage-6.9sage-7.3

comment:24 Changed 6 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:25 Changed 6 years ago by Vincent Delecroix

Description: modified (diff)

comment:26 Changed 6 years ago by Vincent Delecroix

Description: modified (diff)

comment:27 Changed 6 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:28 Changed 6 years ago by Vincent Delecroix

Soya does not support Python 2 anymore (see http://www.lesfleursdunormal.fr/static/informatique/soya3d/index_en.html). Moreover, it now exists on PyPI: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Soya3/

What is the subtle difference between the packages soya and soya_cvs?

comment:29 Changed 6 years ago by Leif Leonhardy

Cc: Leif Leonhardy added

comment:30 Changed 6 years ago by Vincent Delecroix

Description: modified (diff)

comment:31 Changed 6 years ago by Vincent Delecroix

Description: modified (diff)

comment:32 Changed 6 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:33 Changed 6 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:34 Changed 5 years ago by Jeroen Demeyer

Description: modified (diff)

comment:35 Changed 3 years ago by Matthias Köppe

See also #29289 - Remove support for old-style SPKGs, deprecated in Sage 6.9

comment:36 Changed 21 months ago by Matthias Köppe

Authors: John Palmieri
Milestone: sage-7.3sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Priority: criticalmajor
Status: newneeds_review

I think we can close this ticket. These download locations are no longer advertised on our webpage.

comment:37 Changed 21 months ago by Travis Scrimshaw

Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Status: needs_reviewpositive_review

I agree.

comment:38 Changed 19 months ago by Frédéric Chapoton

Resolution: invalid
Status: positive_reviewclosed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.