Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 7 weeks ago
#19220 positive_review task
Archive superseded/broken old-style packages
Reported by: | jhpalmieri | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | website/wiki | Keywords: | |
Cc: | schilly, leif | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | Travis Scrimshaw | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | #19187 | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
The following packages should be removed or moved to "archive":
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/beautifulsoup-3.2.1.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/biopython-1.61.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/brian-1.4.1.p0.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/coxeter3-1.1.spkg (#19178)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/cunningham_tables-1.0.spkg (broken, see #15813)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/database_jones_numfield-v4.spkg (#19174)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/database_kohel-20060803.spkg (broken, #21086)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/guppy-0.1.8.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/kash3-2008-07-31.p0.spkg (binary)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/lie-2.2.2.p5.spkg (#19176)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/mpi4py-1.2.2.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/ore_algebra-0.2.spkg (#19175)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/p_group_cohomology-2.1.4.p1.spkg (broken, #18514)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/pybtex-20120618.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/pyx-0.10.spkg (broken, #21076)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/qhull-2010.1.spkg (#21143)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/sip-4.13.2.p0.spkg (#21087)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/TOPCOM-0.17.4.spkg (#15302)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/trac-0.11.5.p0.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/cmake-2.4.8.spkg (#18078)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/meataxe-2.4.3.spkg (#12103)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/polymake-2.2.p5.spkg (#20892)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/pynifti-p0.spkg (#19187)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/qepcad-1.50.spkg (#10224)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/sip-4.9.3.spkg (more recent in optional)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/soya-0.11.2.p0.spkg (broken)
- http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/experimental/soya_cvs-2006.05.09.spkg (broken)
Later (depending on non-merged tickets):
Change History (37)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by
- Cc schilly added
- Component changed from packages: optional to website/wiki
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Summary changed from Archive the old TOPCOM package to Archive superseded packages
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:7 Changed 6 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:8 Changed 6 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Type changed from defect to task
I think this will serve as a good metaticket.
comment:9 Changed 6 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Summary changed from Archive superseded packages to Archive superseded/broken packages
comment:10 Changed 6 years ago by
Please don't add tickets which don't have positive review yet unless the old package was broken anyway.
comment:11 Changed 6 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:12 follow-up: ↓ 14 Changed 6 years ago by
Presumably this should happen after a stable release of the new pip stuff, though?
comment:13 Changed 6 years ago by
- Dependencies set to #19187
comment:14 in reply to: ↑ 12 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:15 follow-up: ↓ 17 Changed 6 years ago by
Hi, I could move those spkgs any time, but I have no idea about the implications.
comment:16 Changed 6 years ago by
Since the old TOPCOM
has been superseded by a new-style topcom
, I believe it's safe to archive that one.
comment:17 in reply to: ↑ 15 Changed 6 years ago by
Replying to schilly:
Hi, I could move those spkgs any time, but I have no idea about the implications.
Perhaps it should be done after the release of Sage 6.9 stable? That would be a good time.
comment:18 Changed 6 years ago by
Sage 6.9 has been released.
comment:19 Changed 5 years ago by
Is there any reason not to move these spkgs now?
comment:20 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Summary changed from Archive superseded/broken packages to Archive superseded/broken old-style packages
comment:21 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:22 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:23 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Milestone changed from sage-6.9 to sage-7.3
comment:24 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:25 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:26 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:27 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:28 Changed 5 years ago by
Soya does not support Python 2 anymore (see http://www.lesfleursdunormal.fr/static/informatique/soya3d/index_en.html). Moreover, it now exists on PyPI: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Soya3/
What is the subtle difference between the packages soya
and soya_cvs
?
comment:29 Changed 5 years ago by
- Cc leif added
comment:30 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:31 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:32 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:33 Changed 5 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:34 Changed 4 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:35 Changed 14 months ago by
See also #29289 - Remove support for old-style SPKGs, deprecated in Sage 6.9
comment:36 Changed 7 weeks ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-7.3 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Priority changed from critical to major
- Status changed from new to needs_review
I think we can close this ticket. These download locations are no longer advertised on our webpage.
comment:37 Changed 7 weeks ago by
- Reviewers set to Travis Scrimshaw
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
I agree.
Do anybody know whether creating Trac tickets is the proper procedure to deal with old spkgs?