Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#18775 closed enhancement (fixed)
polytopes.icosidodecahedron and graphs.TruncatedIcosidodecahedralGraph
Reported by:  ncohen  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage6.8 
Component:  geometry  Keywords:  graph, polytope 
Cc:  vdelecroix, dimpase  Merged in:  
Authors:  Nathann Cohen  Reviewers:  Frédéric Chapoton 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  a4b9287 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  a4b9287f3e66be106825f090c55ffec7449532ef 
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
As the title claims
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Icosidodecahedron https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truncated_icosidodecahedron
Nathann
Change History (14)
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by
 Branch set to public/18775
 Commit set to 64b689bcb3fe9370bfebd23edefb9148401c3cb2
 Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by
 Commit changed from 64b689bcb3fe9370bfebd23edefb9148401c3cb2 to 9fa4890751b70c1fa2d45573f6e74a770593dd03
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
9fa4890  trac #18775: now with TruncatedTetrahedralGraph

comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by
 Cc dimpase added
For some reason the wikipedia page about the truncated tetrahedron reports 120 automorphisms, and Sage computes 24. I will try to figure this out.
Nathann
comment:4 followup: ↓ 5 Changed 7 years ago by
I have done the Icosidodecahedron in #18225...
comment:5 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 7 years ago by
I have done the Icosidodecahedron in #18225
Oh. Well, then we will update one of the two tickets once the other is merged. I don't care where it comes from, I just want to have it in Sage.
Nathann
comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by
So what do we do?
We can: 1) Review+merge this one and adapt yours 2) Review+merge yours (much longer, as you have more code) and adapt mine
Nathann
comment:7 followup: ↓ 9 Changed 7 years ago by
I have found a typo: in the line
+ The truncated icosidodecahedron is an Archimedean solid with 12 vertices and
it should be "truncated tetrahedon".
And may I request a little pep8 effort ?
comment:8 Changed 7 years ago by
 Commit changed from 9fa4890751b70c1fa2d45573f6e74a770593dd03 to a4b9287f3e66be106825f090c55ffec7449532ef
comment:9 in reply to: ↑ 7 Changed 7 years ago by
it should be "truncated tetrahedon".
Thanks, fixed.
And may I request a little pep8 effort ?
I have no idea what pep8 is about, and I do not intend to read (nor to follow) a document that tells me where I should put spaces before/after the '=' signs. Call me careless, but I find tickets #18904 way more important/urgent. Why people care more about spaces than things like that is beyond me.
Nathann
comment:10 followup: ↓ 13 Changed 7 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
ok, I understand.
Positive review.
I you have some time for a quick review, there is #10922 which is just about doc formatting.
comment:11 Changed 7 years ago by
by the way, what do you think of the new patchbot icons ? click on top right round icon to see some of them..
comment:12 Changed 7 years ago by
 Keywords graph polytope added
 Reviewers set to Frédéric Chapoton
comment:13 in reply to: ↑ 10 Changed 7 years ago by
Helloooo,
Positive review.
Thanks!
I you have some time for a quick review, there is #10922 which is just about doc formatting.
In a second.
by the way, what do you think of the new patchbot icons ? click on top right round icon to see some of them..
Oh. I had not noticed. Well, pretty and more informative :)
Nathann
comment:14 Changed 7 years ago by
 Branch changed from public/18775 to a4b9287f3e66be106825f090c55ffec7449532ef
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
New commits:
trac #18775: polytopes.icosidodecahedron and graphs.TruncatedIcosidodecahedralGraph