Opened 13 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#1861 closed enhancement (fixed)
better document sage.el
| Reported by: | was | Owned by: | was |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-5.2 |
| Component: | user interface | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Merged in: | ||
| Authors: | Ivan Andrus | Reviewers: | Karl-Dieter Crisman |
| Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
| Branch: | Commit: | ||
| Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Status badges
Description
The page here http://www.sagemath.org/emacs has a file sage.el that is slightly modified from the ipython.el file. The documentation of this fact should be clearly stated in the file sage.el, along with some instructions about how to use it and the above URL.
Somebody could fix this and attach the fixed sage.el to this ticket.
Change History (12)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by
- Type changed from defect to enhancement
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.1 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Report Upstream set to N/A
- Status changed from new to needs_review
This has been superseded by the optional sage-mode spkg.
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by
Plus, there isn't even an emacs page at sagemath.org any more. http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode is the new place to go. It does have a lot better documentation.
To be pedantic, I would point out that the current (0.6) spkg doesn't actually say that this is inherited from ipython.el. It is sort of implied in sage-mode-0.6/old/README.txt; is that enough?
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by
Since we don't use the old directory anymore (I'm planning to remove it in the next release), and I'm pretty sure the new stuff isn't derived from ipython.el I think this should be closed as won't fix.
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Ivan Andrus, Karl-Dieter Crisman
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Okay, I'll say that's okay as long as (to honor this ticket) somewhere in the documentation, wiki, bitbucket, whatever, there is a place that says this was inspired by ipython.el originally. Sound good? I'll put that on #13176, which is for upgrading to 0.7.
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
I updated the wiki, and SPKG.txt.
comment:8 follow-ups: ↓ 9 ↓ 11 Changed 9 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix to sage-5.2
- Priority changed from major to minor
- Reviewers changed from Ivan Andrus, Karl-Dieter Crisman to Karl-Dieter Crisman
Great, this is an immediate improvement on the wiki, and 0.8 has this as well. Putting back to a "normal" milestone since #13176 is slightly more complex.
comment:9 in reply to: ↑ 8 Changed 9 years ago by
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by
It's sort of like when someone opens a ticket to do something on Trac itself (create a new report, let's say). Here, updating the wiki and having upstream incorporate this last thing in all future versions was sufficient. After all, the original ticket was just to change a webpage - no patch was really required there.
If you'd really like, I can make a patch from the changeset and these others, attach them here, and we can wait until Ivan actually releases another one or something, but according to the original issue, the changes at the wiki are already more than sufficient. Basically, I figure that the person who actually makes things easier to figure out deserves at least some credit.
comment:11 in reply to: ↑ 8 Changed 9 years ago by
Okay, that's clear.
comment:12 Changed 9 years ago by
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
By the way, this bug was reported by Dan Grayson.