Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 months ago
#18506 closed task (duplicate)
Move PolyBoRi Python bindings to the Sage library
Reported by: | ohanar | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | packages: standard | Keywords: | |
Cc: | fbissey | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | François Bissey | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | u/ohanar/polybori_bindings (Commits, GitHub, GitLab) | Commit: | a05ce2d0ca39f83c5579823746fceef042c659a1 |
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
Change History (12)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by
- Component changed from PLEASE CHANGE to packages: standard
- Type changed from PLEASE CHANGE to task
comment:3 follow-up: ↓ 4 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:4 in reply to: ↑ 3 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_info
Like I said on the other ticket, this needs a discussion on sage-devel
.
comment:6 follow-up: ↓ 7 Changed 6 years ago by
Jeroen, do you have an alternative proposal for dealing with polybori?
comment:7 in reply to: ↑ 6 ; follow-up: ↓ 8 Changed 6 years ago by
Replying to ohanar:
Jeroen, do you have an alternative proposal for dealing with polybori?
Keep it as a separate package.
comment:8 in reply to: ↑ 7 ; follow-up: ↓ 9 Changed 6 years ago by
Replying to jdemeyer:
Replying to ohanar:
Jeroen, do you have an alternative proposal for dealing with polybori?
Keep it as a separate package.
And about the scons dependency?
And, are you volunteering to maintain the separate package? (The point of moving the python bindings to the sage library is to distribute the maintenance, but if you are willing to maintain the separate package, then I'm not opposed to keeping it as a separate package.)
comment:9 in reply to: ↑ 8 Changed 6 years ago by
Replying to ohanar:
And about the scons dependency?
I meant package your github polybori-with-autotools repo as a separate package.
And, are you volunteering to maintain the separate package?
This is not a relevant question. It has to be maintained anyway, inside or outside of Sage. I volunteer for neither.
comment:10 Changed 8 months ago by
- Cc fbissey added
- Milestone changed from sage-6.8 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from needs_info to needs_review
Outdated, should be closed
comment:11 Changed 8 months ago by
- Reviewers set to François Bissey
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:12 Changed 6 months ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
What is the relation to #18437 and do you need a new polybori spkg for this ticket to work?