#17831 closed defect (duplicate)
Update to pyOpenSSL 0.14
Reported by: | vbraun | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-6.6 |
Component: | packages: optional | Keywords: | |
Cc: | dkrenn, schilly | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers: | Volker Braun |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | #17832 | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
Supposedly fixes the
/local/data/krenn/sage/6.5.rc2/local/include/openssl/ssl.h:156:0, from OpenSSL/crypto/x509.h:17, from OpenSSL/crypto/crypto.h:30, from OpenSSL/crypto/crl.c:3: /local/data/krenn/sage/6.5.rc2/local/include/openssl/x509.h:751:15: note: previous declaration of 'X509_REVOKED_dup' was here error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1
bug but introduces a couple of new dependencies: cffi pyasn1 enum34 pycparser
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by
- Component changed from PLEASE CHANGE to packages: optional
- Description modified (diff)
- Type changed from PLEASE CHANGE to defect
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by
- Dependencies set to #17832
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by
- Cc dkrenn added
comment:4 follow-up: ↓ 5 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:5 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 6 years ago by
Replying to tmonteil:
Could you try just doing:
sage -pip install pyopensslIt worked well for me.
Works.
comment:6 follow-up: ↓ 8 Changed 6 years ago by
Close as duplicate of #16897 then?
comment:7 Changed 6 years ago by
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Reviewers set to Volker Braun
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:8 in reply to: ↑ 6 Changed 6 years ago by
- Cc schilly added
Replying to jdemeyer:
Close as duplicate of #16897 then?
I would say yes, but then pyopenssl
should be removed from http://sagemath.org/packages/optional/ and http://sagemath.org/packages/optional/list to trigger an error.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Could you try just doing:
It worked well for me. If this works for you as well, since
pyopenssl
spkg is optional and unmaintained (still uses the old spkg style), it could be a better idea to just remove it from the list of packages and benefit from the up-to-date pip one. We did that forsqlalchemy
for example.