Opened 6 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#17770 closed enhancement (fixed)
Euler numbers revamp
Reported by: | rws | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | symbolics | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
- move
euler_number
fromcombinatorics
tofunctions
- replace pexpect-maxima with maxima-lib implementation
- make GP/Pari the main version with
euler(n)=subst(bernpol(2*n+1), 'x, 1/4)*4^(2*n+1)*(-1)^(n+1)/(2*n+1)
(Charles R Greathouse IV) - mpmath has fp Euler numbers
Change History (8)
comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 2 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 ; follow-up: ↓ 3 Changed 6 years ago by
Replying to jdemeyer:
What you're proposing seems like 4 tickets, not 1 ticket...
It's not substantially more than any other symbolic function ticket. Not that there is heavy use that would justify several tickets.
comment:3 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed 6 years ago by
Replying to rws:
It's not substantially more than any other symbolic function ticket. Not that there is heavy use that would justify several tickets.
Neither of this matters. The question is: can the issue be easily and naturally be split up? If the answer to that is yes, it should be done.
I have just seen too often that a ticket does A, B, C and there are issues with C. These issues with C turn out to be much harder than originally thought. Therefore, A and B are never merged or merged with a big delay, even though they could have been merged quickly.
Note: personally I don't care much about this ticket, so if a reviewer doesn't mind, then it's obviously not a problem.
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.5 to sage-wishlist
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-wishlist to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
See #20763
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:8 Changed 4 years ago by
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
What you're proposing seems like 4 tickets, not 1 ticket...