Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#17546 closed defect (invalid)
odd warning with symbolic function
Reported by: | rws | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | symbolics | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | Ralf Stephan | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
sage: f = function('exp',x) sage: f(8) /home/ralf/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py:2883: DeprecationWarning: Substitution using function-call syntax and unnamed arguments is deprecated and will be removed from a future release of Sage; you can use named arguments instead, like EXPR(x=..., y=...) See http://trac.sagemath.org/5930 for details. exp(8)
Change History (7)
comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 2 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.5 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from new to needs_review
See also #17708.
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by
Since you opened it and now understand it (seems related to #17447, in fact), you can feel free to do your own review in this limited case. At least, that is my opinion; I don't know how others would react, but I have a fairly liberal interpretation of common Sage practice for that.
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Ralf Stephan
comment:7 Changed 6 years ago by
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
What's the problem? If you don't want the warning: