Three factor construction of MOLS

[ncohen]

Yet another construction ! New designs for 648, 968, 936, 1144, 1224 and others ...

With good doc :-P

Nathann

[git]

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:

​c218148	trac #16604: OA(15,896)
​6074f4b	trac #16604: OA(16,208)
​35cbadc	trac #16604: OA(16,176)
​bfcc6f5	trac #16604: Now without copy and paste
​326ece4	trac #16604: OA(20,352)
​a621220	trac #16604: OA(20,416)
​54fc1e1	trac #16604: OA(20,544)
​6e47439	trac #16662: OA for n=1046,1059,2164,3992,3994
​87dd885	trac #16665: New OA for n=408,600,792,856,1368,2328,...
​c26f728	trac #16673: Three factors construction of MOLS

[git]

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:

​717385e

trac #16673: Three factors construction of MOLS

[git]

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:

​0232b73	trac #16604: OA(20,544)
​e5f428d	trac #16604: Merged with 6.3.beta6
​355ac2a	trac #16662: OA for n=1046,1059,2164,3992,3994
​15b449c	trac #16665: New OA for n=408,600,792,856,1368,2328,...
​a515dee	trac #16673: Three factors construction of MOLS

[git]

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:

​053945d	trac #16662: merge 6.3
​166b525	trac #16662: doc + test
​8fcaed0	trac #16662: New assertion
​2a64fa2	trac #16662: find_thwart_lemma_3_5
​68a2d99	trac #16662: Review
​7e0480e	trac #16662: Merged with 6.4.beta0
​a9b594f	trac #16662: A comment about n<N-2
​8615065	trac #16665: New OA for n=408,600,792,856,1368,2328,...
​64b21bc	trac #16665: cosmetic
​9e144a6	trac #16673: Three factors construction of MOLS

[git]

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. Last 10 new commits:

​6c21904	trac #16797: correct a row/column inversion
​48b6902	trac #16604: merge #16797
​579e75b	trac #16604: input check + doctest
​e1a83d0	trac #16604: Optional check flag
​05c6915	trac #16604: Variable rename and list->set
​24c4f7f	trac #16604: Merge with updated #16797
​7a73e74	trac #16662: Merge with updated #16604
​a71cf90	trac #16665: New OA for n=408,600,792,856,1368,2328,...
​539c365	trac #16665: cosmetic
​9cbc23c	trac #16673: Three factors construction of MOLS

[vdelecroix]

Hello,

Why the product_with_parallel_classes is not an independent function in orthogonal_arrays.py?

Vincent

[ncohen]

Because I did not think it was a good idea to expose a function like that to the user for the moment. This function is very specific, it mostly does what the oa product already does and it can lead to confusions (a guy finds this function before the other, and so uses it for the usual product).

When the OA library will be more "research-level" and everything why not, but for the moment there is not much to play with the OA themselves or do anything with them. We just generate those which exist.

I was somehow convinced that I had written another commit that needed this function too, but I don't seem to find it again. I hope I did not lose it anywhere or filed it in the wrong "component".

Nathann

[ncohen]

Well. I know that #16655 is somehow a dependency of #16780 as #16780 can be shortened if the resolvable=True flag is available. But I was sure I had done something similar with this product....

Anyway O_o

Nathann

[vdelecroix]

Review at u/vdelecroix/16673.

Everything is fine, if you agree with the review you can set to positive review.

Vincent

[ncohen]

Everything is fine, if you agree with the review you can set to positive review.

Great ! Thank you very much !

I'm not a big fan of 'step=' in range but well, it's equivalent and it does not make it much harder to understand, sooo... Good to go ! :-)

Nathann

---

New commits:

​3fb8806

trac #16673: review (one line simplicaction + doc)