Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#16524 closed enhancement (fixed)
OA(9,135)
Reported by:  ncohen  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage6.3 
Component:  combinatorial designs  Keywords:  
Cc:  vdelecroix  Merged in:  
Authors:  Nathann Cohen  Reviewers:  Vincent Delecroix 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  a0294d3 (Commits)  Commit:  a0294d3b5b6d2e1cbf6f3f5dd625df765350a478 
Dependencies:  #16503  Stopgaps: 
Description
A new one !
Nathann
Change History (26)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by
 Branch set to u/ncohen/16524
 Dependencies changed from 16347 to #16347
 Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by
 Commit set to d94b4c6daccc0544ccd14a6bd0235d97fe4af8c2
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by
 Dependencies changed from #16347 to #16500
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by
 Dependencies changed from #16500 to #16503
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by
 Commit changed from d94b4c6daccc0544ccd14a6bd0235d97fe4af8c2 to 4148cc472331568ec20ed614c10895edb040bbf8
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. Last 10 new commits:
e64be98  trac #16423: tiny code improvement and alignment

e948cf6  trac #16423: Aligning the alignment

0a7d853  trac #16423: Broken doctests

b329351  trac #16499: Cheap speedup in the OA recursive constructions

a67c04f  trac #16500: New recursive constructions of Orthogonal Arrays

41c50d5  trac #16500: Simplified find_recursive_construction

e1992ce  trac #16500: doc + speedup

697dd0c  trac #16500: Typoes in the doc

71dad5d  trac #16503: qx construction of Orthogonal Arrays

4148cc4  trac #16524: OA(9,135)

comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by
 Commit changed from 4148cc472331568ec20ed614c10895edb040bbf8 to 002ceee1c2cd49be71135d710057a9dea1de81c8
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
002ceee  trac #16524: OA(9,135)

comment:7 followup: ↓ 9 Changed 5 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_info
Hi Nathann,
This is not clear (at least to me)
This is possible, because `PG(2,2)` is a subdesign in `PG(2,16)`; in a cyclic `PG(2,16)` or `BIBD(273,17,1)` the points `\equiv 0 \pmod{39}` form such a subdesign.
It would be better to have the (273,17,1) from the difference family constructor... I just did it and there is an extra check in the doc that it is actually a cyclic one: u/vdelecroix/16524
.
Vincent
comment:8 Changed 5 years ago by
 Commit changed from 002ceee1c2cd49be71135d710057a9dea1de81c8 to c6e78c8f358758c88fd5fe7d806c9ead5e503a33
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
c6e78c8  trac #16524: move the cyclic difference set to the constructor

comment:9 in reply to: ↑ 7 ; followup: ↓ 10 Changed 5 years ago by
Yo !
This is not clear (at least to me)
This is possible, because `PG(2,2)` is a subdesign in `PG(2,16)`; in a cyclic `PG(2,16)` or `BIBD(273,17,1)` the points `\equiv 0 \pmod{39}` form such a subdesign.
Ahahahah. It is "Julian Abel's truth". And as the constructions works... :)
It would be better to have the (273,17,1) from the difference family constructor... I just did it and there is an extra check in the doc that it is actually a cyclic one:
u/vdelecroix/16524
.
I just pushed it to the branch, but in the future I guess that we will remove this function as we add the patch of all DF found in the handbook. We will not create a function for each of them, and it will be a dictionary ... Anyway !
Nathann
comment:10 in reply to: ↑ 9 ; followup: ↓ 11 Changed 5 years ago by
Replying to ncohen:
Yo !
This is not clear (at least to me)
This is possible, because `PG(2,2)` is a subdesign in `PG(2,16)`; in a cyclic `PG(2,16)` or `BIBD(273,17,1)` the points `\equiv 0 \pmod{39}` form such a subdesign.Ahahahah. It is "Julian Abel's truth". And as the constructions works...
:)
I mean, what is a PG? what do you mean by points \equiv 0 \pmod{39}
?
It would be better to have the (273,17,1) from the difference family constructor... I just did it and there is an extra check in the doc that it is actually a cyclic one:
u/vdelecroix/16524
.I just pushed it to the branch, but in the future I guess that we will remove this function as we add the patch of all DF found in the handbook. We will not create a function for each of them, and it will be a dictionary ... Anyway !
Of course, it is on my todo list... but in the meantime let us continue the way we started!
Vincent
comment:11 in reply to: ↑ 10 Changed 5 years ago by
Yo !
I mean, what is a PG? what do you mean by points
\equiv 0 \pmod{39}
?
Oh ! Well, a projective plane ! PG = Projective Geometry. And the points congruent to = mod 39 are somehow "defined" as it is a cyclic design on 273 points.
Of course, it is on my todo list... but in the meantime let us continue the way we started!
Yepyep...
Nathann
comment:12 Changed 5 years ago by
Hi,
More docs at u/vdelecroix/16524
. It is the only method where the notation PG
is used!! If you like, take it and set to positive review...
Vincent
comment:13 followup: ↓ 17 Changed 5 years ago by
Hmmmm... I don't like to change his words but well... Okay, if you prefer...
Nathann
comment:14 Changed 5 years ago by
 Commit changed from c6e78c8f358758c88fd5fe7d806c9ead5e503a33 to a0294d3b5b6d2e1cbf6f3f5dd625df765350a478
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a0294d3  trac #16524: more comments in the doc

comment:15 Changed 5 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_info to needs_review
comment:16 Changed 5 years ago by
 Reviewers set to Vincent Delecroix
comment:17 in reply to: ↑ 13 Changed 5 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:18 Changed 5 years ago by
thanks !
comment:19 Changed 5 years ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/release/Sage/src/doc/common/builder.py", line 1490, in <module> getattr(get_builder(name), type)() File "/home/release/Sage/src/doc/common/builder.py", line 291, in _wrapper getattr(get_builder(document), 'inventory')(*args, **kwds) File "/home/release/Sage/src/doc/common/builder.py", line 502, in _wrapper x.get(99999) File "/home/release/Sage/local/lib/python/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 558, in get raise self._value OSError: [combinat ] /home/release/Sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/combinat/designs/orthogonal_arrays_recursive.py:docstring of sage.combinat.designs.orthogonal_arrays_recursive.construction_q_x:65: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
comment:20 Changed 5 years ago by
Actually the bug is in #16503
comment:21 Changed 5 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
comment:22 Changed 5 years ago by
Can't reproduce it ...
Nathann
comment:23 Changed 5 years ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
Update to do, see #16503.
comment:24 followup: ↓ 25 Changed 5 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
No conflict > no update needed. Stop making me work for nothing, or do it yourself.
Nathann
comment:25 in reply to: ↑ 24 Changed 5 years ago by
comment:26 Changed 5 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/ncohen/16524 to a0294d3b5b6d2e1cbf6f3f5dd625df765350a478
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
trac #16430: Small speedup for OA(None,p^c)
trac #16430: Merged with 6.3.beta4
trac #16430: Many bugfixes
trac #16430: micro improvements
trac #16430: put back the seealso
trac #16347: merge #16430
trac #16437: fix MOLS table doctest
trac #16437: use is_sum_of_two_squares and fix error msg
trac #16347: optimize find_wilson_decomposition
trac #16524: OA(9,135)