Opened 8 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#16427 new enhancement
Explain the rationale for having both categories and a hierarchy of Cython abstract classes for Parents and Elements
Reported by: | nthiery | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-6.4 |
Component: | categories | Keywords: | |
Cc: | sage-combinat, hivert, SimonKing, darij, nbruin, pbruin, vbraun, tscrim, ohanar | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Nicolas M. Thiéry | Reviewers: | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | u/nthiery/explain_the_rationale_for_having_both_categories_and_a_hierarchy_of_cython_abstract_classes_for_parents_and_elements (Commits, GitHub, GitLab) | Commit: | 01fdfabeeee07c6157df72b409303c0adce67174 |
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
The title says it all :-)
Upcoming here: benchmarks to support and illustrate the discussion.
One of the threads that triggered this ticket:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/tVrqhKQ1QDs/lnru7s0feKkJ
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by
- Cc tscrim added
comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by
- Branch set to u/nthiery/explain_the_rationale_for_having_both_categories_and_a_hierarchy_of_cython_abstract_classes_for_parents_and_elements
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by
- Cc ohanar added
- Commit set to 01fdfabeeee07c6157df72b409303c0adce67174
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4
comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by
Should this be set to needs_review?
comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by
Again: Should this be set to needs_review, Nicolas?
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
New commits:
16427: Explain the rationale for having both categories and a hierarchy of Cython abstract classes for Parents and Elements
16427: Typo fix