Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #16295, comment 64


Ignore:
Timestamp:
06/05/14 06:51:47 (5 years ago)
Author:
ncohen
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #16295, comment 64

    initial v1  
    1111> to have `are_mutually_orthogonal_squares` add the two extra columns and then simply call `is_orthogonal_array`.  This will have the effect of checking that all the squares are, in fact latin and you will not have to have `are_mutually_orthogonal_squares` do this extra checking.
    1212
    13 I would have agreed if the function only returned True/False answer. What you are telling me to do is that I should consider all latins squares as k rows of a TD to which I add the two row/column ones, only to differentiate them later in a function that has no reason to contain MOLS-specific code.
     13I would have agreed if the function only returned `True/False` answer. What you are telling me to do is that I should consider all latins squares as k rows of a TD to which I add the two row/column ones, only to differentiate them later in a function that has no reason to contain MOLS-specific code.
    1414
    1515This is why it does not make sense to me to build a homogeneous input only to dissassemble it immediately afterwards.