Opened 6 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#16221 closed enhancement (fixed)
Add (symbolic) Struve functions
Reported by:  kcrisman  Owned by:  

Priority:  minor  Milestone:  sage7.2 
Component:  symbolics  Keywords:  special, holonomic 
Cc:  Merged in:  
Authors:  Ralf Stephan  Reviewers:  KarlDieter Crisman, Frédéric Chapoton 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  cf92ce3 (Commits)  Commit:  cf92ce34b1f0e865f1cbd9b635837c46aa9372e4 
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
Apparently Maxima has this.
struve_h (v,z) Struve H function struve_l (v,z) Struve L function
See #15024 and the symbolic wiki on Trac for more detail.
Change History (26)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.2 to sage6.3
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by
 Branch set to u/rws/add__symbolic__struve_functions
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by
 Commit set to 03e076a4474e2e980ea76e16ff60e36e02fcbd28
 Keywords special holonomic added
 Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.3 to sage6.4
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by
 Commit changed from 03e076a4474e2e980ea76e16ff60e36e02fcbd28 to a6a6310813b80d68e96985e440095be2b80eae8b
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a6a6310  Merge branch 'develop' into t/16221/add__symbolic__struve_functions

comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by
 Commit changed from a6a6310813b80d68e96985e440095be2b80eae8b to e7ad2ee405cca158e708ae4a9dcee43c37406735
comment:7 Changed 5 years ago by
 Reviewers set to KarlDieter Crisman
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_info
Comments, putting 'needs info' just so the status is clear.
 Think we should implement A&S 12.1.15 or 12.2.10?
 This
sage: struve_L(i.n(),100) 1.07916123209824e42 + 4.90584803419713e22*I
doesn't seem to agree with WA, though I don't know whether it should even be implemented.  W functions claims something that isn't in A&S but that certainly works with mpmath:
sage: struve_H(2,0) struve_H(2, 0) sage: struve_H(3,0) struve_H(3, 0) sage: struve_H(3,0).n() 0.000000000000000 sage: struve_H(2,0).n() 0.000000000000000 sage: struve_H(7/2,0) struve_H(7/2, 0) sage: struve_H(7/2,0).n() 0.000000000000000
 Maybe doctest at least a couple of the interfaces, at least with mpmath and Maxima? (I don't know if Maxima returns any of these when you plug in this particular DE, but if it did that would be perfect.)
Otherwise I think this is definitely ready to get in, and a useful addition!
comment:8 Changed 5 years ago by
One more thing  just like in #15024, probably there should be a little topmatter added, just for completeness.
comment:9 Changed 5 years ago by
comment:10 Changed 5 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_info to needs_work
comment:11 Changed 4 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/rws/add__symbolic__struve_functions to u/rws/16221
comment:12 Changed 4 years ago by
 Commit changed from e7ad2ee405cca158e708ae4a9dcee43c37406735 to 34c4d1eba8daa80f43236ebb1bc5656331e0fe7f
 Milestone changed from sage6.4 to sage6.8
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
That should do it. Could you please have a final glance?
New commits:
34c4d1e  16221: Struve functions

comment:13 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
According to the developer guide, .. math::
would better be .. MATH::
.
There is a strange carret here (appears twice)
+ r""" + ^ EXAMPLES:: +
comment:14 Changed 4 years ago by
 Commit changed from 34c4d1eba8daa80f43236ebb1bc5656331e0fe7f to faf5fd5976b89eaf7151b1d6f5339c78b35bec39
comment:15 Changed 4 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.8 to sage7.1
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:16 Changed 4 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/rws/16221 to u/rws/162211
comment:17 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
doc of _print_latex_
is not formatted correctly (twice)
REFERENCE blocks are not formatted correctly either.
comment:18 Changed 4 years ago by
 Commit changed from faf5fd5976b89eaf7151b1d6f5339c78b35bec39 to fbb69997fc0b3f012b51e95622bba0c7638f69aa
comment:19 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:20 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
doc does not build: duplicate citation ASHandbook
comment:21 Changed 4 years ago by
 Commit changed from fbb69997fc0b3f012b51e95622bba0c7638f69aa to cf92ce34b1f0e865f1cbd9b635837c46aa9372e4
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
cf92ce3  16221: complete references

comment:22 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
The references in functions/
need some love in general.
comment:23 Changed 4 years ago by
 Reviewers changed from KarlDieter Crisman to KarlDieter Crisman, Frédéric Chapoton
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
ok, let it be
comment:24 Changed 4 years ago by
Thanks for the review!
comment:25 Changed 4 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage7.1 to sage7.2
comment:26 Changed 4 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/rws/162211 to cf92ce34b1f0e865f1cbd9b635837c46aa9372e4
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
New commits:
16221: implement Struve H/L functions