Opened 8 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#16046 closed defect (wontfix)
parameter allow_subfield of absolute_order_from_module_generators has no effect
Reported by: | saraedum | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | number theory | Keywords: | |
Cc: | jakobkroeker | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | Julian Rüth | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: | wrongAnswerMarker |
Description
The following doctest in sage.rings.number_field.order.absolute_order_from_module_generators
is incorrect:
sage: F.<alpha> = NumberField(x**4+3) sage: F.order([alpha**2], allow_subfield=True) Order in Number Field in alpha with defining polynomial x^4 + 3
This should be a order in a smaller field. The code for allow_subfield
seems incomplete.
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by
- Cc jakobkroeker added
- Stopgaps set to wrongAnswerMarker
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.4 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from new to needs_review
Fixed in #24934.
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Julian Rüth
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by
- Resolution set to wontfix
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
closing positively reviewed duplicates
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Interesting. I just ran into this problem again. We never added the stopgap actually.