Opened 8 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#15813 closed enhancement (wontfix)
make cunningham_tables-1.0.spkg standard and upgrade it
Reported by: | rws | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | packages: standard | Keywords: | package, cunningham, factorization |
Cc: | roed | Merged in: | |
Authors: | David Roe, Ralf Stephan | Reviewers: | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | u/rws/ticket/15813 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab) | Commit: | 7738db3a4e19b16e3dd03495e92444443e2c65a4 |
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
The optional spkg cunningham_tables-1.0 has no tickets, and is now available since sage-4.3.1. It is remarkably small.
According to #7240, it was voted to be included as standard. The newest version would be http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/roed/cunningham_tables-2.2.spkg
It however uses the obsolete SAGE_DATA, so a fixed version of the SPKG is attached. Also, in #7240 David Roe uploaded a patch that provides access to the tables. This is the first commit visible here. It however misses and changes some things.
Needed for #7240.
Attachments (1)
Change History (14)
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by
- Keywords package cunningham factorization added
comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
Changed 8 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by
- Cc roed added
- Description modified (diff)
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by
- Branch set to u/rws/ticket/15813
- Created changed from 02/13/14 09:00:56 to 02/13/14 09:00:56
- Modified changed from 02/21/14 09:31:52 to 02/21/14 09:31:52
comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by
- Commit set to 7d1204fcd9a647766d20cdd3dba5ed609203302f
- Status changed from new to needs_review
I reverted David's unrelated changes to databases/install.py
@roed: David, if you want to deprecate database_install()
please open a separate ticket.
New commits:
391d5f5 | Trac #7240: update cunningham_tables package to version 2.2
|
7d1204f | Trac #15813: add ref to databases/all.py; revert silent changes to install.py
|
comment:6 Changed 8 years ago by
- Commit changed from 7d1204fcd9a647766d20cdd3dba5ed609203302f to 670fb1cd18fd8b3a3a3ffd9a7e07b29b1e32241e
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
670fb1c | Merge branch 'develop' into ticket/15813
|
comment:7 Changed 8 years ago by
- Commit changed from 670fb1cd18fd8b3a3a3ffd9a7e07b29b1e32241e to 7738db3a4e19b16e3dd03495e92444443e2c65a4
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7738db3 | Merge branch 'develop' into ticket/15813
|
comment:8 Changed 8 years ago by
We need a plain tarball (gz/bz2) for standard packages. David, can you make one?
comment:9 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3
comment:10 Changed 8 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
Some problem when buiding in patchbot. Set flag again when tarball available.
comment:11 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4
comment:12 Changed 4 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.4 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
The package is now not even experimental. The spkg is no longer available. The issue is superseded by #12133 because the Brent database contained the Cunningham tables.
So this is a duplicate.
comment:13 Changed 4 years ago by
- Resolution set to wontfix
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
closing positively reviewed duplicates
David Roe's spkg with SAGE_DATA fix