Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #15621, comment 5


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jan 5, 2014, 7:38:05 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
Andrew Mathas
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #15621, comment 5

    initial v1  
    33> I was thinking it was necessary for #15508, but then I realized I was directly using the parent class instead of just going through `PartitionTuples`. I'll change this back, and put some warnings about this. Although I think we should make sure we can convert from level 1 partition tuples to partitions if the user happens to accidentally have created one.
    44
    5 Perhaps I am being too precious here:) In a discussion on sage-combinat Simon King was certainly very much against the current behaviour...and changing this is certainly not so drastic for my code. The main different is that with the change the level 1 partition tuples would be missing many of the methods of the honest partition counter-parts. Another way out would be to force partition tuples to have level at least 2.
     5Perhaps I am being too precious here:) In a discussion on sage-combinat Simon King was certainly very much against the current behaviour...and changing this is certainly not so drastic for my code. The main difference/annoyance is that with this change the level 1 partition tuples would be missing many of the methods of their honest partition counter-parts. Another way out would be to force partition tuples to have level at least 2.
    66
    77> If I understand Fayers correctly, the generalized LLT works for the full tensor product space and the `RegularPartitionTuples` should index that basis. I had put a TODO message in #15508 about wanting to use a smaller domain. I'm now thinking the best thing to do is just do that now and have both spaces available, but that's something specifically for #15508.