Changes between Version 8 and Version 27 of Ticket #15299


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 9, 2013, 11:09:47 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
Jeroen Demeyer
Comment:

Reported the precision issue, they fixed it. There is supposed to be an absolute error bound (not relative), but I don't know what the bound is...

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #15299

    • Property Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
    • Property Milestone changed from sage-5.13 to sage-pending
    • Property Dependencies changed from to #15337
    • Property Report Upstream changed from N/A to Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release.
    • Property Reviewers changed from to Peter Bruin
  • Ticket #15299 – Description

    v8 v27  
    1515 1.82478252137476307223140369768561190028055347258560054363485475966241792307587640145132294203994875344783110100551912347495775160520204557245032474939095251969168953786545612090565728262067746413119194690260652692254781091147749697957445424152473292233020112755190503925812425294821095313979e-270)
    1616}}}
     17
     18While working on this, we found an upstream PARI bug: the precision for `exponential_integal_1()` was not as good as it could be.