#15017 closed enhancement (fixed)
Symbolic spherical harmonic
Reported by:  eviatarbach  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage6.3 
Component:  symbolics  Keywords:  
Cc:  burcin, kcrisman  Merged in:  
Authors:  Eviatar Bach  Reviewers:  Jan Keitel, Travis Scrimshaw 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  8588d16 (Commits)  Commit:  
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
This ticket is for making spherical_harmonic
a symbolic function.
Attachments (2)
Change History (20)
Changed 5 years ago by
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by
 Cc burcin added
 Status changed from new to needs_review
Changed 5 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by
New patch gets coverage to 100% and fixes an issue in _eval_
.
Patchbot apply trac15017_2.patch
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by
 Cc kcrisman added
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.1 to sage6.2
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.2 to sage6.3
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
Patch does not merge.
comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by
 Branch set to u/jkeitel/15017
 Commit set to ee464ee19684ebdc9479caeecfba823cfbf6e4aa
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
New commits:
ee464ee  Imported patch for making spherical harmonic symbolic.

comment:8 Changed 4 years ago by
I've imported the patch and made one tiny change in _evalf_
to fix a couple of doctests.
comment:9 Changed 4 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/jkeitel/15017 to public/ticket/spherical_harmonic15017
 Commit changed from ee464ee19684ebdc9479caeecfba823cfbf6e4aa to 8588d165f9500afc62ae47374e10c62871ababb8
 Reviewers set to Jan Keitel, Travis Scrimshaw
comment:10 Changed 4 years ago by
Is 'Merzbacher' available online, so that we can do a real reference? Just wondering.
comment:11 Changed 4 years ago by
I think the citation was just copied from the Maxima documentation, which refers to Eugen Merzbacher Quantum Mechanics (2nd edition, 1970).
comment:12 Changed 4 years ago by
Frankly, I can't make sense of that. What is 9.64 supposed to refer it? Surely not equation 9.64 in http://instrumentation.tamu.edu/~ting/other/QM_Merzbacher.pdf
Should we just remove the reference?
comment:13 Changed 4 years ago by
Fine with me.
comment:14 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
I gather this is now positive?
comment:15 followup: ↓ 18 Changed 4 years ago by
 Commit changed from 8588d165f9500afc62ae47374e10c62871ababb8 to 872e2bc0225b6929ed8cc052a63850c892abe723
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_review
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:
872e2bc  Remove old reference from spherical harmonics.

comment:16 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Well, now it is.
comment:17 Changed 4 years ago by
 Branch changed from public/ticket/spherical_harmonic15017 to 872e2bc0225b6929ed8cc052a63850c892abe723
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
comment:18 in reply to: ↑ 15 Changed 3 years ago by
 Branch changed from 872e2bc0225b6929ed8cc052a63850c892abe723 to 8588d165f9500afc62ae47374e10c62871ababb8
 Commit 872e2bc0225b6929ed8cc052a63850c892abe723 deleted
Replying to git:
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:
872e2bc Remove old reference from spherical harmonics.
This last commit has not been merged, see the discussion at sagedevel. I opened a new ticket for that commit: #18218.
Patchbot apply trac15017.patch