Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#14957 closed enhancement (fixed)
Square-free decomposition and any_root for polynomials
| Reported by: | pbruin | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.13 |
| Component: | algebra | Keywords: | polynomial sd51 |
| Cc: | roed, jpflori, mraum, fstromberg, JCooley, davidloeffler, dfesti | Merged in: | sage-5.13.beta0 |
| Authors: | David Roe, Jean-Pierre Flori, Peter Bruin | Reviewers: | Jean-Pierre Flori, Peter Bruin |
| Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
| Branch: | Commit: | ||
| Dependencies: | #14888 | Stopgaps: |
Status badges
Description (last modified by )
This patch improves the method Polynomial.squarefree_decomposition() and adds a new method Polynomial.any_root(). This has been split off from #8335, and is a dependency of that ticket.
Apply:
Attachments (3)
Change History (15)
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
- Keywords sd51 added
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
- Cc roed jpflori mraum fstromberg JCooley davidloeffler dfesti added
CC-ing the authors of #8335 and Sage Days 51 participants on this split-off ticket.
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
New patch with various improvements. Most importantly: improved documentation, removed unused parameter extend of any_root, which caused a doctest failure.
Patchbot: apply trac_14957-squarefree_decomposition_any_root.patch
comment:4 follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed 9 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Jean-Pierre Flori, Peter Bruin
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
I already reviewed David's code and did not really touch this part apart for a few fixes.
I also agree with Peter's changes.
Everything seems to work fine, but note that if I test this on top of #14888, then two doctests fail. I think we should make this one depend on #14888, does anyone disagree? If we go this way, this should get positive review.
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_info
- Work issues set to rebase on top of #14888?
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to jpflori:
Everything seems to work fine, but note that if I test this on top of #14888, then two doctests fail. I think we should make this one depend on #14888, does anyone disagree?
That makes sense, since #14888 already has a positive review and we would have to change one or the other anyway.
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
- Dependencies set to #14888
- Description modified (diff)
- Status changed from needs_info to positive_review
- Work issues rebase on top of #14888? deleted
Patchbot: apply * trac_14957-squarefree_decomposition_any_root.patch * trac_14957-doctests_14888.patch
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by
Those were also the doctest failures I was getting, so I am happy with the fixes and the positive review.
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.12 to sage-pending
comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-pending to sage-5.13
comment:12 Changed 9 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.13.beta0
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
enhance Polynomial.squarefree_decomposition(), add Polynomial.any_root()