Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 5 years ago
#14829 needs_info enhancement
Representations and latex representations of uniformizers
Reported by:  caruso  Owned by:  roed 

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage6.4 
Component:  padics  Keywords:  printing uniformizer 
Cc:  Merged in:  
Authors:  Xavier Caruso  Reviewers:  
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  u/rws/representations_and_latex_representations_of_uniformizers (Commits)  Commit:  fe4873621e37ffa5cca0022306ac364c17e6ddc6 
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
This small package provides the functions uniformizer_name
and latex_uniformizer_name
that returns a "pretty" string/latex representation of the uniformizer of a discrete valuation ring/field (either a padic ring/field or a ring of Laurent series or a field of power series).
These functions can be useful because, in the padic world, a uniformizer prints itself together with some O(...).
Attachments (1)
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by
 Status changed from new to needs_review
 Summary changed from Representations and latex representations of to Representations and latex representations of uniformizers
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
Changed 6 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
Fixed. (And sorry for the delay, I forgot this...)
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.1 to sage6.2
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.2 to sage6.3
comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by
 Branch set to u/rws/representations_and_latex_representations_of_uniformizers
comment:7 Changed 5 years ago by
 Commit set to fe4873621e37ffa5cca0022306ac364c17e6ddc6
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
fe48736  Merge branch 'develop' into t/14829/representations_and_latex_representations_of_uniformizers

comment:8 Changed 5 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.3 to sage6.4
comment:9 Changed 5 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_info
I don't understand which problem this patch is trying to solve and why you give errors when the base ring is not a field...
sage hg qrefresh e
and editing the commit message before exporting the patch).