1 | | ~~Replying to [comment:10 nthiery]:~~ |

2 | | ~~> Grumble, my comment never made it through; stupid trac. Well, it's kind of late now, but since I had typed it in ....~~ |

3 | | ~~> ~~ |

4 | | ~~> Replying to [comment:5 VivianePons]:~~ |

5 | | ~~> > actually there is a strong use case: in FindStat we need the method to consider the map between posets and graphs. When people look for a stat on posets, this maps allows us to also look on graphs.~~ |

6 | | ~~> > ~~ |

7 | | ~~> > From a pure Sage point of vue, I think it is actually a nice shortcut: not everyone thinks of transforming the poset into a Hasse diagram.~~ |

8 | | ~~> ~~ |

9 | | ~~> I would find more natural to have hasse_diagram be a combinatorial map from posets to directed graphs (possibly with an alias to_digraph, or just digraph for consistency with crystals). And to have another combinatorial map from directed graphs to graphs. The composition of the two maps is not super canonical.~~ |

10 | | ~~> ~~ |

11 | | ~~> Have fun at Findstat Days 1!~~ |