Opened 4 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#14694 closed enhancement (fixed)
Update SymPy to 0.7.3
Reported by: | eviatarbach | Owned by: | jdemeyer |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.12 |
Component: | packages: standard | Keywords: | |
Cc: | fbissey | Merged in: | sage-5.12.beta5 |
Authors: | Eviatar Bach | Reviewers: | François Bissey, Jeroen Demeyer |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
SymPy 0.7.3 was released on July 13, 2013. The release notes are at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/release-notes-for-0.7.3.
spkg: http://www.phas.ubc.ca/~eviatarb/sympy-0.7.3.spkg
apply: trac14694_5.patch
Attachments (5)
Change History (38)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by
- Cc fbissey added
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Summary changed from Update SymPy to 0.7.2 to Update SymPy to 0.7.3
comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by
I created the new SPKG, it's up at http://www.phas.ubc.ca/~eviatarb/sympy-0.7.3.spkg.
The patch fixes the only doctest failure I could find.
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by
Yes the pretty printing test. There was another one that was broken with 0.7.2 in sage-on-gentoo I will have to chase it to check it is gone away.
comment:8 Changed 4 years ago by
OK, I check on a vanilla 5.12.beta1 and there is one more doctest failure as with 0.7.2 on sage-on-gentoo:
sage -t --long devel/sage/sage/symbolic/constants.py ********************************************************************** File "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/constants.py", line 715, in sage.symbolic.constants.NotANumber._sympy_ Failed example: sympy.nan == NaN # indirect doctest Expected: True Got: False ********************************************************************** 1 item had failures: 1 of 3 in sage.symbolic.constants.NotANumber._sympy_
The other patch works fine. We may want to get upstream involved with that one.
comment:9 Changed 4 years ago by
Okay. Do you think we could still merge it though? I don't think users should be comparing SymPy? and Sage objects too often anyway.
comment:10 Changed 4 years ago by
Sure but the doctest has to be fixed one way or another before we merge. I am not giving a positive review while there is a known doctest breakage.
comment:11 Changed 4 years ago by
Yeah that's what I meant. Patch coming up.
Changed 4 years ago by
comment:13 Changed 4 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Not sure what to do with the old doctest but it all passes now. LEt's try to make it for beta4.
comment:14 Changed 4 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:15 Changed 4 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:16 Changed 4 years ago by
Sorry forgot to also include the patch in the description. Only the last patch should be applied.
comment:17 Changed 4 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:18 Changed 4 years ago by
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/displayhook.py ********************************************************************** File "devel/sage/sage/misc/displayhook.py", line 25, in sage.misc.displayhook Failed example: shell.run_cell('integral(x^2/pi^x, x)') Expected: / 2 2 \ -x*log(pi) -\x *log (pi) + 2*x*log(pi) + 2/*e -------------------------------------------- 3 log (pi) Got: / 2 2 \ -x*log(pi) -\x *log (pi) + 2*x*log(pi) + 2/*e --------------------------------------------- 3 log (pi) **********************************************************************
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/ascii_art.py ********************************************************************** File "devel/sage/sage/misc/ascii_art.py", line 807, in sage.misc.ascii_art.ascii_art Failed example: ascii_art(sum(binomial(2*n,n+1)*x^n, n, 0, oo)) Expected: / __________ \ -\2*x + \/ -4*x + 1 - 1/ ------------------------- __________ 2*x*\/ -4*x + 1 Got: / __________ \ -\2*x + \/ -4*x + 1 - 1/ -------------------------- __________ 2*x*\/ -4*x + 1 **********************************************************************
(note the number of hypens)
sage -t devel/sage/sage/symbolic/integration/integral.py ********************************************************************** File "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/integration/integral.py", line 474, in sage.symbolic.integration.integral.integrate Failed example: (x^y-z).integrate(y,algorithm="sympy") Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/mazur/release/merger/sage-5.12.beta4/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 479, in _run self.execute(example, compiled, test.globs) File "/mazur/release/merger/sage-5.12.beta4/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 838, in execute exec compiled in globs File "<doctest sage.symbolic.integration.integral.integrate[41]>", line 1, in <module> (x**y-z).integrate(y,algorithm="sympy") File "expression.pyx", line 9759, in sage.symbolic.expression.Expression.integral (sage/symbolic/expression.cpp:40828) File "/mazur/release/merger/sage-5.12.beta4/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/integration/integral.py", line 683, in integrate return integrator(expression, v, a, b) File "/mazur/release/merger/sage-5.12.beta4/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/integration/external.py", line 39, in sympy_integrator return result._sage_() File "/mazur/release/merger/sage-5.12.beta4/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sympy/core/add.py", line 721, in _sage_ s += x._sage_() AttributeError: 'Piecewise' object has no attribute '_sage_' **********************************************************************
comment:19 Changed 4 years ago by
Hum. I assumed the new patch was correct for the first one on the basis that it was correct in the first version. Not sure how the second one escaped unless eviatarbach used 5.10, it is also specifc to 0.7.3, 0.7.2 just works. The last one is also showing a difference between 0.7.2 and 0.7.3.
comment:20 Changed 4 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
Sorry, I should have run testall
. New patch fixes all the tests that were failing.
Changed 4 years ago by
Changed 4 years ago by
comment:21 Changed 4 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:22 Changed 4 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
Why did you change
(x^y-z).integrate(y,algorithm="sympy")
to
(x*y-z).integrate(y,algorithm="sympy")
One needs a good reason to remove doctests.
comment:23 follow-up: ↓ 24 Changed 4 years ago by
Because now SymPy? returns a Piecewise
object for that integral, which can't be converted back to Sage. Making the conversion work would actually require a change in SymPy?, since currently we look for the _sage_
method in SymPy? objects, which isn't defined for Piecewise
.
I couldn't think of anything else to do except modifying the doctest, at least until the conversions are fixed upstream. What do you suggest?
comment:24 in reply to: ↑ 23 Changed 4 years ago by
Replying to eviatarbach:
I couldn't think of anything else to do except modifying the doctest, at least until the conversions are fixed upstream. What do you suggest?
At least, mark the existing doctest # known bug
.
comment:25 Changed 4 years ago by
I would catch instead of changing it so we can know when it is fixed. In any case I will contact sympy upstream shortly about it.
comment:26 Changed 4 years ago by
See Aaron interesting answer at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sympy/VRNKUeJATNs
comment:27 Changed 4 years ago by
I might repeat my request here for people to help out adding _sage_ methods to unsupported objects in SymPy?. The number of SymPy? users who know the corresponding Sage methods is rather low, unfortunately. But SymPy? currently has a lot of special functions and special objects like Piecewise which won't convert directly (even for the special functions, a direct name conversion might not work because of convention differences).
comment:28 Changed 4 years ago by
Also, feel free to CC me on any SymPy? related issue in this issue tracker.
Changed 4 years ago by
comment:29 Changed 4 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
Thank you Aaron, I will see if I can submit a pull request adding _sage_
methods. It would be good for SymPy? and Sage to interface better to each other.
New patch added. How does this one look?
comment:30 Changed 4 years ago by
When marking a test # known bug
, you should add the doctest result what you want to get, not what you actually get. In other words, just add # known bug
without changing the result of the test.
comment:31 Changed 4 years ago by
Changed 4 years ago by
comment:32 Changed 4 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:33 Changed 4 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.12.beta5
- Resolution set to fixed
- Reviewers changed from François Bissey to François Bissey, Jeroen Demeyer
- Status changed from needs_review to closed
SymPy? is now on version 0.7.3, so that's what the Sage version should be updated to.