Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#14629 closed enhancement (fixed)
Upgrade and clean up sqlite package
Reported by: | jdemeyer | Owned by: | jdemeyer |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.10 |
Component: | packages: standard | Keywords: | sqlite package |
Cc: | Merged in: | sage-5.10.beta5 | |
Authors: | Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers: | François Bissey |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
spkg: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/sqlite-3.7.17.spkg (spkg diff)
apply: 14629_sqlite.patch to the Sage library.
sqlite-3.7.17 (Jeroen Demeyer, 24 May 2013)
- #14629: upgrade to version 3.7.17
- Use standard template for SPKG.txt and spkg-install, use $MAKE instead of make
- Remove Fortran and C++ stuff from spkg-install
- Compile with -DSQLITE_WITHOUT_ZONEMALLOC on OS X <= 10.4
Attachments (2)
Change History (11)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Status changed from new to needs_review
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:5 follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed 9 years ago by
Funny that. We did face the upgrade in sage-on-gentoo in sage 5.8 and we had the same issue. Christopher was supposed to open a ticket with his solution but he never did.
--- sage/databases/cremona.py.orig 2013-02-19 10:33:56.000000000 +0000 +++ sage/databases/cremona.py 2013-03-18 16:51:58.950097433 +0000 @@ -634,19 +634,19 @@ sage: it = CremonaDatabase().__iter__() sage: it.next().label() - '11a1' + '1001a1' sage: it.next().label() - '11a2' + '1001b1' sage: it.next().label() - '11a3' + '1001b2' sage: it.next().label() - '14a1' + '1001b3' sage: skip = [it.next() for _ in range(100)] sage: it.next().label() - '45a3' + '1014g2' """ for c in self.__connection__.cursor().execute('SELECT curve FROM ' \ - + 't_curve'): + + 't_curve ORDER BY curve'): yield self.elliptic_curve(c[0]) def __getitem__(self, N):
Anyway, your solution looks good too. One concern we had: is it fast?
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 5 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to fbissey:
One concern we had: is it fast?
I have no idea, but I assume that SQLite is sufficiently fast. There are other place too where ORDER BY
is used. In any case, your patch is not good because it assumes that there is no curve of conductor 10001 for example. This assumption is false if the large Cremona database has been installed.
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Roger that, of course we don't currently package the large Cremona database so it was easy to miss. Looks all good to me, positive review.
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by
- Reviewers set to François Bissey
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.10.beta5
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed