Opened 7 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#14515 closed enhancement (wontfix)
Constructor for triangular graphs
Reported by: | ncohen | Owned by: | jason, ncohen, rlm |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | graph theory | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Nathann Cohen | Reviewers: | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
Attachments (1)
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 follow-up: ↓ 3 Changed 7 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
comment:3 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed 7 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
Yoooooooooooooooooooooooo !!!
Looking at the patch, there seems to be a comma in the import statement rather than a dot.
Really ? How could it work then ? O_o
Fixed, anyway !
Also, is this an important enough class to warrant its own entry in the catalog? It's really easy to construct for end users anyway.
Yeah, I wondered too. Three lines and no added values, as I cannot even give a general nice embedding... Well, this thing is also meant to be a database of graphs, actually, so the more the better. At some point I would also want to be able to test a conjecture on "all graphs that Sage knows how to build".
Well, it's up to you, I am not very convinced either. Actually, I was trying to create all the strongly regular graphs I could build from Brouwer's website and get them in Sage, but after writing this class I hit a wall trying to build another weird strongly regular graph, so I sent the patch.
It's up to you then. Otherwise we can close the ticket and the code will stay here until we chose to integrate it if we want. I do not really mind.
Have fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuun !
Nathann
Changed 7 years ago by
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.1 to sage-6.2
comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3
comment:7 Changed 5 years ago by
Well, given that nobody commented on this for 14 months, and the class is still trivial to construct, I propose to close the ticket and not add TriangularGraphs? to Sage.
I don't know what status change is appropriate for this, so I'm leaving it as "needs_review" for now.
comment:8 Changed 5 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:9 Changed 5 years ago by
- Resolution set to wontfix
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Looking at the patch, there seems to be a comma in the import statement rather than a dot. Also, is this an important enough class to warrant its own entry in the catalog? It's really easy to construct for end users anyway.