Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#14354 closed defect (fixed)
simplicial complexes: add_face doesn't clear enough cached data
Reported by: | jhpalmieri | Owned by: | tbd |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | sage-5.9 |
Component: | algebraic topology | Keywords: | |
Cc: | tscrim | Merged in: | sage-5.9.beta2 |
Authors: | John Palmieri | Reviewers: | Travis Scrimshaw |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
Running add_face
on a simplicial complex doesn't clear various data related to homology calculations:
sage: T = SimplicialComplex([range(1,5)]).n_skeleton(1) sage: T.homology() {0: 0, 1: Z x Z x Z} sage: T.add_face([1,2,3]) sage: T.homology() # should be free of rank 2 {0: 0, 1: Z x Z x Z, 2: 0} sage: SimplicialComplex(T.facets()).homology() {0: 0, 1: Z x Z, 2: 0}
See also http://ask.sagemath.org/question/2391/homology-of-simplicial-complexes.
Attachments (1)
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by
- Component changed from PLEASE CHANGE to geometry
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by
- Component changed from geometry to algebraic topology
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by
Good point, thanks. Fixed now.
Changed 5 years ago by
comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Travis Scrimshaw
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Thank you.
comment:7 Changed 5 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.9.beta2
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Could you make
self.__contractible = {}
toself.__contractible = None
to be consistent with the initial state (I also think this will result in a speedup for larger complexes since I think it will know to compute a large contractible subcomplex)? Other than that, I think this looks good. Thanks.