Changes between Version 20 and Version 21 of Ticket #14346


Ignore:
Timestamp:
04/11/13 10:27:12 (7 years ago)
Author:
jdemeyer
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #14346 – Description

    v20 v21  
    1 This spkg has 15 patches, with the following :
    2  1. get_ld.patch: author known, pure packaging - GOOD
    3  2. get_tests.patch: author known, pure packaging - GOOD
    4  3. get_config_options.patch: author known, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't - BAD
    5  4. get_fltk.patch: author known, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't - BAD
    6  5. get_X11.patch: author known, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't - BAD
    7  6. get_dlcflags.patch: author known, upstream-worthy, a comment says upstream has a partial fix but doesn't say that better patch has been forwarded, which probably means it wasn't - BAD
    8  7. install_doc_no_make.patch: author known, pure packaging - GOOD
    9  8. perl_path.patch: author known, pure packaging - GOOD
    10  9. cygwin_dll_a.patch: author known, pure packaging - GOOD
    11  10. KERNELCFLAGS.patch: author unknown, you have to look at a bug report to see who the author is and that it was forwarded upstream - HALF-GOOD
    12  11. src/kernel/gmp/mp.c: author unknown, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't - BAD
    13  12. GCC_PR49330.patch: author unknown, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't - BAD
    14  13. trac_13902_determinant.patch: author unknown, upstream backport, hopefully not too modified - GOOD?
    15  14. galoisanalysis_p4.patch: author unknown, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't - BAD
    16  15. polred.patch: author unknown, upstream backport + added function -- the upstream backport is ok, adding a new function isn't [that should be done in the sage library] - BAD
     1This spkg has 15 patches, with the following:
     2
     3Good:
     4 * get_ld.patch: author known, pure packaging
     5 * get_tests.patch: author known, pure packaging
     6 * install_doc_no_make.patch: author known, pure packaging
     7 * perl_path.patch: author known, pure packaging
     8 * cygwin_dll_a.patch: author known, pure packaging
     9 * trac_13902_determinant.patch: author unknown, upstream backport, hopefully not too modified
     10
     11Half-good:
     12 * KERNELCFLAGS.patch: author unknown, you have to look at a bug report to see who the author is and that it was forwarded upstream
     13
     14Bad:
     15 * get_config_options.patch: author known, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't
     16 * get_fltk.patch: author known, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't
     17 * get_X11.patch: author known, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't
     18 * get_dlcflags.patch: author known, upstream-worthy, a comment says upstream has a partial fix but doesn't say that better patch has been forwarded, which probably means it wasn't
     19 * src/kernel/gmp/mp.c: author unknown, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't
     20 * GCC_PR49330.patch: author unknown, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't
     21 * galoisanalysis_p4.patch: author unknown, upstream-worthy, no comment says it was forwarded, which probably means it wasn't
     22 * polred.patch: author unknown, upstream backport + added function -- the upstream backport is ok, adding a new function isn't [that should be done in the sage library]