Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#14255 closed enhancement (fixed)
Provides some further functionalities for combinatorial maps
Reported by: | stumpc5 | Owned by: | tbd |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.9 |
Component: | combinatorics | Keywords: | combinatorial map |
Cc: | chrisjamesberg, VivianePons | Merged in: | sage-5.9.beta1 |
Authors: | Christian Stump | Reviewers: | Travis Scrimshaw |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
This patch provides some further functionalities for combinatorial maps.
Attachments (1)
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
- Component changed from PLEASE CHANGE to combinatorics
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 follow-up: ↓ 3 Changed 9 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Travis Scrimshaw
comment:3 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to tscrim:
thanks for your review, Travis!
This can then be used to be applied to an element.
means that this is now an unbounded function and it takes one input parameter, namely self
. How do you think I should write that?
Return the unbounded..."
alright, I will do that... (but first waiting for your answer to the above).
comment:4 follow-up: ↓ 5 Changed 9 years ago by
How does this sound:
You can use this method to return a function which takes as input an element in the domain of the combinatorial map. See the example below.
? Also could you put another blank line between this and the "Return" line? Thank you.
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:5 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to tscrim:
How does this sound:
You can use this method to return a function which takes as input an element in the domain of the combinatorial map. See the example below.? Also could you put another blank line between this and the "Return" line? Thank you.
Fixed, thanks!
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Thank you Christian.
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.9.beta1
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Hey Christian,
Looks good but there's two minor docstring things. First is I don't understand this line 210 in
unbounded_map()
:Second (and more nitpicky and far less important), the first line is suppose to be in the "affirmative" according to python doc standards:
Thanks,
Travis