Opened 9 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#14102 closed enhancement (fixed)
Nonsymmetric Macdonald Polynomials for all affine types
Reported by:  bump  Owned by:  sagecombinat 

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage6.3 
Component:  combinatorics  Keywords:  Nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials, days40, days45, days49, days54, ICERM2013 
Cc:  sagecombinat  Merged in:  
Authors:  Nicolas M. Thiéry, Anne Schilling  Reviewers:  Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiéry, Mark Shimozono, Bogdan Ion 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  docpdf 
Branch:  a0ceb91 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  a0ceb91854a6899d33001c984f709ad5758e8317 
Dependencies:  #4327, #14143, #13589, #10963, #14673, #14610, #14775, #15931  Stopgaps: 
Description (last modified by )
This ticket implements nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials for arbitrary affine Cartan type (including twisted and BC, but not Koornwinder) using the recursion formula in terms of DemazureLusztig and Cherednik operators. It complements the typeA implementation based on the HHL combinatorial formula of #2708.
This patch was written by Anne Schilling and Nicolas M. Thiéry during the ICERM Semester Program on "Automorphic Forms, Combinatorial Representation Theory and Multiple Dirichlet Series" (January 28, 2013  May 3, 2013) with the help of Dan Bump, Ben Brubaker, Bogdan Ion, Dan Orr, Arun Ram, Siddhartha Sahi, and Mark Shimozono. Special thanks go to Bogdan Ion and Mark Shimozono for their patient explanations and hand computations to check the code.
In a followup ticket #14847 Whittaker functions and other features will become available.
Attachments (2)
Change History (96)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
 Keywords polynomials days40 days45 added
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by
 Dependencies set to #4327, #14143, #10963, #14673, #14610
 Description modified (diff)
 Keywords days49 added
comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Reviewers set to Nicolas M. Thiery, Anne Schilling, Mark Shimozono, Bogdan Ion
comment:6 Changed 8 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Reviewers changed from Nicolas M. Thiery, Anne Schilling, Mark Shimozono, Bogdan Ion to Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiéry, Mark Shimozono, Bogdan Ion
 Status changed from new to needs_review
 Summary changed from Nonsymmetric Macdonald Polynomials to Nonsymmetric Macdonald Polynomials for all affine types
comment:7 followups: ↓ 8 ↓ 11 Changed 8 years ago by
comment:8 in reply to: ↑ 7 Changed 8 years ago by
Hi Mark,
The family returned by NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials? should possess a method that gives direct access to the affine Hecke representation of which it is a basis.
Do you mean that you want the operators
T = KL.twisted_demazure_lusztig_operators ( q1, q2, convention="dominant") T_Y = KL.demazure_lusztig_operators_on_classical(q, q1, q2, convention="dominant")
directly available? Or in which format do you want the Hecke algebra representation? You can get
sage: E = NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials(["A",2,1]) sage: E._KL Group algebra of the Ambient space of the Root system of type ['A', 2, 1] over Fraction Field of Multivariate Polynomial Ring in q, q1, q2 over Rational Field
Best,
Anne
comment:9 followup: ↓ 10 Changed 8 years ago by
Anne,
The methods I wanted were hidden in the _T and _T_Y attributes.
Why does twisted_demazure_lusztig_operators use classical().dual().affine().dual()? I believe this is correct for untwisted root systems but why do we know this is correct for twisted root systems? If this is a bug it only affects the zeroth Hecke operator.
comment:10 in reply to: ↑ 9 ; followup: ↓ 12 Changed 8 years ago by
Replying to mshimo:
The methods I wanted were hidden in the _T and _T_Y attributes.
Ok. Feel free to add whichever accessors you might think relevant.
Why does twisted_demazure_lusztig_operators use classical().dual().affine().dual()? I believe this is correct for untwisted root systems but why do we know this is correct for twisted root systems? If this is a bug it only affects the zeroth Hecke operator.
Well, it's not a bug, since we get the correct results :)
More seriously: The cartan type as specified here is actually not really used, except for testing for the relations. It indeed looks dubious and should at some point be rewritten using the "other_affinization" method and the like. We must have been lucky to specify a type that gives the same Coxeter group.
So, if you have a short way to specify the cartan type which you believe is more correct, please go ahead. Otherwise I think this can wait until someone reimplements T0_check in a less adhock way.
Cheers,
Nicolas
comment:11 in reply to: ↑ 7 Changed 8 years ago by
Replying to mshimo:
I would like to add symmetric Macdonald polynomials to this patch. It should be straightforward, especially if the AHA representation is at hand.
Cool. Since this patch is quite big already, I guess that could go in a followup ticket like the whittaker function one.
comment:12 in reply to: ↑ 10 ; followup: ↓ 13 Changed 8 years ago by
Nicolas,
Well, it's not a bug, since we get the correct results :)
Do you know of an independent way to compute the nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomial for twisted root systems, not just the t=0 specialization? How was this verified?
comment:13 in reply to: ↑ 12 Changed 8 years ago by
Hi Mark,
Do you know of an independent way to compute the nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomial for twisted root systems, not just the t=0 specialization? How was this verified?
The code currently checks that the results (i.e. the nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials) are indeed eigenvectors of the Y operators. These conditions are not easy to satisfy. For types A_n^{(1)}
, B_n^{(1)}
, BC_n^{(2)}
and BC_n^{(2)}
dual the NSMs were carefully compared against Bogdan Ion's hand and maple computations. If you are worried, I can ask him to confirm type A_{2n1}^{(2)}
as well.
Best,
Anne
comment:14 Changed 8 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:15 followup: ↓ 16 Changed 8 years ago by
Nicolas,
I added symmetric macdonald polynomials, fixed the parabolic root system stuff, and edited the docs for nonsymmetric macdonalds rather extensively. I already folded my review patch onto the given patch. Please have a look and if it is ok, replace the above exported patch (I don't have sufficient permissions to do so).
Mark
comment:16 in reply to: ↑ 15 Changed 8 years ago by
Hi Mark,
Thank you for adding the parabolic root stuff and the symmetric Macdonald polynomials. Usually it is much better not to fold your patch straight in, so that the other people can review your changes first.
Best,
Anne
comment:17 Changed 8 years ago by
Mark's review patch can be retrieved from the queue history: http://combinat.sagemath.org/patches/rev/f9a14d979bb9
I am reviewing it now.
comment:18 followups: ↓ 20 ↓ 22 Changed 8 years ago by
Hi Mark!
Thanks a lot for yor work. The documentation reads much better now. Here are a couple questions about your changes:
 sage: w = W.from_reduced_word([2,3])  sage: w.quantum_bruhat_successors([1,3])  Traceback (most recent call last):  ...  ValueError: s2*s3 is not of minimum length in its coset of the parabolic subgroup  generated by the reflections [1, 3]
Was there a reason for removing this test?
 This implementation, based on the general recursion formula,  covers all affine types including untwisted, twisted, `BC` and its  dual. + This implementation covers all reduced affine root systems.
The phrasing certainly can be improved, but I think it is useful to briefly state the method used.
The extended affine Hecke algebra contains the Y's
Do we really need to mention the extended affine Hecke algebra? The Y's that are implemented are obtained by compositions of the T's and indexed by (co)roots.
629 + if len(index_set) == 0: 630 + return []
Was there a reason for this test in positive_roots? For now I removed it.
I removed the method for sums of parabolic positive roots. Do we still really need "is_parabolic_root"?
I did a couple changes in a review patch which I am about to push.
One remaining thing: I noticed that you changed "nonsymmetric" to "nonsymmetric". If this is really what we want, then for consistency we should rename the class to NonsymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials? (and its file accordingly). But that would not be consistent with the e.g. NonCommutativeSymmetricFunctions?.
Cheers,
Nicolas
comment:19 Changed 8 years ago by
A couple further comments:
About symmetric macdo:
 Could you add a couple tests comparing them to the other implementation in type A?
 Do we have other potential consistency checks? Maybe test that they are indeed symmetric?
 We should make sure that, in the current way they are calculated, the caching happens properly. I.e. when we sum over the orbit, we want that e.g. T_{1,2}(f) reuses T_{1}(f).
Other than that, I would be in favor of extracting the changes about "positive roots" to a separate ticket, since they are mostly unrelated to macdonald polynomials (or are they not?).
comment:20 in reply to: ↑ 18 ; followup: ↓ 21 Changed 8 years ago by
Replying to nthiery:
I did a couple changes in a review patch which I am about to push.
Pushed on the queue! Please review!
comment:21 in reply to: ↑ 20 ; followup: ↓ 23 Changed 8 years ago by
comment:22 in reply to: ↑ 18 ; followup: ↓ 24 Changed 8 years ago by
Replying to nthiery:
 sage: w = W.from_reduced_word([2,3])  sage: w.quantum_bruhat_successors([1,3])  Traceback (most recent call last):  ...  ValueError: s2*s3 is not of minimum length in its coset of the parabolic subgroup  generated by the reflections [1, 3]Was there a reason for removing this test?
I got a doctest error I didn't understand (stupid reason): the tester was producing a blank line that wasn't matching the doctest string.
 This implementation, based on the general recursion formula,  covers all affine types including untwisted, twisted, `BC` and its  dual. + This implementation covers all reduced affine root systems.The phrasing certainly can be improved, but I think it is useful to briefly state the method used.
I can add that (or rather put it back in).
The extended affine Hecke algebra contains the Y'sDo we really need to mention the extended affine Hecke algebra? The Y's that are implemented are obtained by compositions of the T's and indexed by (co)roots.
If only coroots are involved then no. I can take that out.
629 + if len(index_set) == 0: 630 + return []Was there a reason for this test in positive_roots? For now I removed it.
It is not needed (I added it during debugging before finding that the initial set of simple roots needed to be changed before the search).
I removed the method for sums of parabolic positive roots. Do we still really need "is_parabolic_root"?
That sum method should be thought of as analogous to the computation of rho. This fixed quantity (depends only on the root system and subset of index set) gets used many times over in the computation of the parabolic quantum Bruhat graph (which we then use to make KR crystals). That is why I decided not to delete it. There is a method in root_systems/root_space.py called quantum_root that requires this sum as well.
is_parabolic_root is probably not really needed.
I did a couple changes in a review patch which I am about to push.
One remaining thing: I noticed that you changed "nonsymmetric" to "nonsymmetric". If this is really what we want, then for consistency we should rename the class to NonsymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials? (and its file accordingly). But that would not be consistent with the e.g. NonCommutativeSymmetricFunctions?.
Not really. I'm generally against unnecessary hyphenation. (By the way I like NoncommutativeSymmetricFunctions? better than the alternative.)
comment:23 in reply to: ↑ 21 Changed 8 years ago by
I cannot see that you recently pushed.
Argl, sorry. I had cloned from a local repository (to avoid messing with my local C3 changes), and did not notice I was thus pushing back there ...
Done!
Cheers,
Nicolas
comment:24 in reply to: ↑ 22 ; followup: ↓ 25 Changed 8 years ago by
Replying to mshimo:
I removed the method for sums of parabolic positive roots. Do we still really need "is_parabolic_root"?
That sum method should be thought of as analogous to the computation of rho. This fixed quantity (depends only on the root system and subset of index set) gets used many times over in the computation of the parabolic quantum Bruhat graph (which we then use to make KR crystals). That is why I decided not to delete it.
It's used many times there indeed, but if I remember well calculated only once at the beginning of the method.
Ok. If I recall correctly my review patch has taken it out.
May I let you implement the little things on which we agreed, and possibly reinstate sums_of_parabolic_positive_roots, with a cache and documentation, if you think it's really worthwhile?
I'm generally against unnecessary hyphenation.
I see your point.
Not totally consistent.
(By the way I like NoncommutativeSymmetricFunctions? better than the alternative.)
On the other hand NCSF has been the traditional shorthand for a while ...
Hmm. Here is what we have in Sage currently:
NonCommutativeSymmetricFunctions? NonDecreasingParkingFunction? NonDecreasingParkingFunctions? NonNegativeIntegerSemiring? NonNegativeIntegers? NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials? NonattackingFillings?
There is a bias, but it's not perfectly consistent.
Do we need to make a poll on sagedevel?
Cheers,
Nicolas
comment:25 in reply to: ↑ 24 Changed 8 years ago by
Nicolas,
Right now the quantum bruhat graph is twice broken; I will repair it.
The quantum_bruhat_successors method in categories/weyl_groups (element method) gets called repeatedly (once for each element of the parabolic quotient) to generate the quantum Bruhat graph. Each time this function is called, it needs to loop through the set of positive roots that are NOT in the parabolic subsystem; each such root could lead to a quantum arrow. For this reason I'm going to reinstate the function that constructs the nonparabolic positive roots. At this point I don't see a reason why one should also not remember the sum of these roots (rather than recompute it repeatedly).
Also the quantum_root method (in root_systems/root_space.py), which is called by quantum_bruhat_successors, requires the same sum.
I'll put the failing doctest back in. I couldn't match the exception message, which started with a <BLANKLINE> rather than Traceback. Maybe you can match it.
Mark
comment:26 followup: ↓ 27 Changed 8 years ago by
I pushed another review patch after Nicolas' review patch.
I figured out the doctest issue.
There is a direct formula (see Cherednik's 2009 book, formula (3.3.15)) for the symmetric macdonald as a linear combination of nonsymmetric Macdonalds (with complicated rational function coefficients), which someone else can program when they feel inspired. This is the same kind of chore as writing a function for the precise eigenvalues in the nonsymmetric Macdonald recurrence.
comment:27 in reply to: ↑ 26 ; followup: ↓ 28 Changed 8 years ago by
Hi Mark and Nicolas,
Thank you both for your review patches. I looked them both over and in principle it is fine with me to fold them in (I made some minor fixes to Mark's review patch).
Regarding the naming, I agree with Mark that it is nicer to remove the hyphens. However, can we nonetheless leave the name of the class as NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials? in accordance with NCSF and most other classes? I do not mind this convention in sage since the real meaning is in (non)symmetric and not the non. But if you really want to change it, that is fine with me as well.
Best,
Anne
comment:28 in reply to: ↑ 27 Changed 8 years ago by
Hi Mark and Nicolas,
Here is an update on the twisted types. I asked Bogdan Ion for data for type A_5^{(2)}
. Everything seems to match:
sage: K = QQ['q,t'].fraction_field() sage: q,t = K.gens() sage: E = NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials(["A",5,2], q, t**2,1) sage: omega = E.keys() sage: vars = K['x1,x2,x3'].gens() sage: x1,x2,x3 = K['x1,x2,x3'].gens() sage: E[omega[1]].expand(vars) == x1 True sage: E[omega[1]].expand(vars) == (t1)*(t+1)*(q*t^101)*x1/((t^2*q1)*(q*t^51)*(q*t^5+1))+(t1)*(t+1)*x2/(t^2*q1)+(t1)*(t+1)*x3/(t^2*q1)+(t1)*(t+1)/((t^2*q1)*x2)+1/x1+(t1)*(t+1)/((t^2*q1)*x3) True sage: E[omega[2]].expand(vars) == (t1)*(t+1)*x1/(q*t^81)+x2 True sage: E[omega[2]].expand(vars) == (q*t^6+1)*(t1)*(t+1)*(q*t^61)*x1/((q*t^51)*(q*t^5+1)*(q*t^41))+(t+1)*(t1)*(q*t^81)*x2/((q*t^51)*(q*t^5+1)*(q*t^41))+(t1)*(t+1)*x3/(q*t^41)+1/x2+(t1)*(t+1)/((q*t^41)*x3) True sage: E[omega[1]omega[2]].expand(vars) == (t1)*(t+1)*(q^3*t^10+2*t^10*q^2q^2*t^82*t^6*q^2+q*t^8q*t^62*q*t^4+q+2t^4)/((t^2*q1)*(q*t^41)*(q*t^31)*(q*t^3+1))+(t+1)*(t1)/((t^2*q1)*x3*x2)+(t+1)*(t1)*x3/((t^2*q1)*x2)+(t+1)^2*(t1)^2*(q*t^4+t^2+1)*x1*x3/((q*t^31)*(q*t^3+1)*(t^2*q1))+(t+1)*(t1)*(q*t^61)*x1/((q*t^31)*(q*t^3+1)*(t^2*q1)*x2)+(t+1)^2*(t1)^2*(q*t^4+t^2+1)*x1/((q*t^31)*(q*t^3+1)*(t^2*q1)*x3)+(t+1)*(t1)*(t^10*q^2q*t^8+t^8q*t^6t^4+1)*x1*x2/((t^2*q1)*(q*t^41)*(q*t^31)*(q*t^3+1))+(t+1)*(t1)*(q*t^61)*x2/((q*t^31)*(q*t^3+1)*(t^2*q1)*x1)+(t+1)^2*(t1)^2*(q*t^4+t^2+1)*x3*x2/((q*t^31)*(q*t^3+1)*(t^2*q1))+1/(x1*x2)+(t+1)*(t1)*x3/((t^2*q1)*x1)+(t+1)*(t1)/((t^2*q1)*x1*x3)+(t+1)^2*(t1)^2*(q*t^4+t^2+1)*x2/((q*t^31)*(q*t^3+1)*(t^2*q1)*x3) True sage: E[omega[1]omega[2]].expand(vars) == (q*t^6+1)*(t1)*(t+1)*(q*t^61)*q/((q*t^51)*(q*t^5+1)*(q*t^41))+(t1)*(t+1)*x1*x3/(q*t^41)+x1/x2+(t1)*(t+1)*x1/((q*t^41)*x3)+(t+1)*(t1)*(q*t^81)*x1*x2/((q*t^51)*(q*t^5+1)*(q*t^41))Truesage: E[omega[3]].expand(vars) == (t1)*(t+1)*x1/(q*t^61)+(t1)*(t+1)*x2/(q*t^61)+x3True sage: E[omega[3]].expand(vars) == (q*t^6+1)*(t1)*(t+1)*x1/((q*t^51)*(q*t^5+1))+(q*t^6+1)*(t1)*(t+1)*x2/((q*t^51)*(q*t^5+1))+(t1)*(t+1)*x3/((q*t^51)*(q*t^5+1))+1/x3 True
I put a review patch putting (similar) tests for twisted types as a review patch.
Nicolas, please review everything, fold and upload the updated patch!
Thanks,
Anne
comment:29 followup: ↓ 30 Changed 8 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:30 in reply to: ↑ 29 Changed 8 years ago by
Hi Nicolas and Mark,
I made some mini changes, but other than that everything looks good now!
Anne
comment:31 followup: ↓ 32 Changed 8 years ago by
Why does the patchbot see red? Does it mean the patches don't apply?
comment:32 in reply to: ↑ 31 Changed 8 years ago by
 Dependencies changed from #4327, #14143, #10963, #14673, #14610 to #4327, #14143, #13589, #10963, #14673, #14610
comment:33 Changed 8 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:34 Changed 8 years ago by
comment:35 Changed 8 years ago by
Nicolas, I updated the patch on the combinat queue since there was a subtle bug in the symmetric macdonald polynomials having to do with caching and the order of searching a Weyl orbit. Didn't export it to trac.
Again I forgot to make a separate review patch. There is a doctest change in symmetric_macdonald polynomials and a change in the orbit method of root_lattice_realizations, to calling TransitiveIdealGraded? instead of TransitiveIdeal?.
Mark
comment:36 Changed 8 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage5.11 to sagepending
comment:37 followup: ↓ 38 Changed 8 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:38 in reply to: ↑ 37 Changed 8 years ago by
Ok, Mark, I updated the patch on the trac server!
Anne
Changed 8 years ago by
comment:39 Changed 8 years ago by
 Dependencies changed from #4327, #14143, #13589, #10963, #14673, #14610 to #4327, #14143, #13589, #10963, #14673, #14610, #14755
 Description modified (diff)
The updated patch has been trivially rebased on top of 14755 which is about to get merged.
comment:40 followup: ↓ 41 Changed 8 years ago by
 Dependencies changed from #4327, #14143, #13589, #10963, #14673, #14610, #14755 to #4327, #14143, #13589, #10963, #14673, #14610, #14775
comment:41 in reply to: ↑ 40 ; followup: ↓ 42 Changed 8 years ago by
Changed 8 years ago by
comment:42 in reply to: ↑ 41 Changed 8 years ago by
Apply trac_14102nonsymmetricmacdonald.2.patch
Fixed broken doctests in pieri_factors.py that must have sneaked in during the last 3 months.
comment:43 Changed 8 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:44 Changed 8 years ago by
 Branch set to public/combinat/nonsymmetric_macdonald14102
 Commit set to dfc1fe8876f0eca75aaad312fb197edf823fde20
comment:45 Changed 8 years ago by
 Keywords days54 added
comment:46 Changed 8 years ago by
I'm getting occasional random failures
sage t long src/sage/combinat/root_system/non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.py ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/combinat/root_system/non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.py", line 200, in sage.combinat.root_system.non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials Failed example: T._test_relations() # long time (1.3s) Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/buildbot/build/sage/bsd1/sage_git/build/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 480, in _run self.execute(example, compiled, test.globs) File "/Users/buildbot/build/sage/bsd1/sage_git/build/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 839, in execute exec compiled in globs File "<doctest sage.combinat.root_system.non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials[30]>", line 1, in <module> T._test_relations() # long time (1.3s) File "/Users/buildbot/build/sage/bsd1/sage_git/build/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/combinat/root_system/hecke_algebra_representation.py", line 471, in _test_relations tester.assertEqual(x, y) File "/Users/buildbot/build/sage/bsd1/sage_git/build/local/lib/python/unittest/case.py", line 515, in assertEqual assertion_func(first, second, msg=msg) File "/Users/buildbot/build/sage/bsd1/sage_git/build/local/lib/python/unittest/case.py", line 508, in _baseAssertEqual raise self.failureException(msg) AssertionError: (q1^2*q2^2q1*q2^3)*B[e[0]  e[1] + 2*e['delta']] + (q1^2*q2^2q1*q2^3)*B[e[0] + e['delta']  e[1]] + (q1*q2^3)*B[2*e[1] + 2*e['delta']] + (q1^2*q2^2q1*q2^3)*B[e['delta']] != (q1^2*q2^22*q1*q2^3q2^4)*B[e[0]  e[1] + 2*e['delta']] + (q1*q2^3+q2^4)*B[e[0] + 2*e['delta']  e[1]] + (q1^2*q2^2q1*q2^3)*B[e[0]  e[1] + e['delta']] + (q1*q2^3)*B[2*e[1] + 2*e['delta']] + (q1^2*q2^2q1*q2^3)*B[e['delta']]
comment:47 Changed 8 years ago by
Yikes! Thanks Volker for the report.
On the right hand side, the index e[0]  e[1] + 2*e['delta']
appears twice; collected together one would get the same value as on the left hand side. So now we need to figure out why the two occurences of e[0]  e[1] + 2*e['delta']
are not detected as equal. For this, I would need to reproduce the error in order to introspect the values in a debugger.
Volker: did you notice any pattern for when the error occurs (platform, frequency)? Or should I just launch the test enough times on any platform and it should occur at some point?
Cheers,
comment:48 followup: ↓ 50 Changed 8 years ago by
This was on the snapperkob (Ubuntu x86_64) and bsd (OSX 10.6) buildbot, so shouldn't be a problem to reproduce if you run it in a loop...
comment:49 Changed 8 years ago by
 Commit changed from dfc1fe8876f0eca75aaad312fb197edf823fde20 to 9d365416bb2bceae585b0c456d2ea2abc758f94f
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_review
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. Last 10 new commits:
98a4407  rename summand_* methods of Cartesian products

3e2003d  Reviewed Peter's renaming of summand_* methods of Cartesian products, using deprecated_function_alias

c718f21  #10963: typo fix 12963 > 10963

56c8eaa  Merge branch 'develop' into ticket/10963

7ab3103  Fixing some typos in the category primer and category_with_axioms

f1b6804  Merge branch 'public/ticket/10963docdistributive' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into public/ticket/10963docdistributive

977a940  Axioms: minor improvements here and there, and reworked explanations about the binding behavior of categories with axioms

acd58b3  Fix failing tests due to little conflict when merging with #12141 (finite dimensional algebra)

ece5c97  Axioms: fixed merge with #15873

9d36541  Merge branch 'public/ticket/10963docdistributive' into u/aschilling/combinat/nonsymmetric_macdonald14102

comment:50 in reply to: ↑ 48 ; followup: ↓ 57 Changed 8 years ago by
I rebased on the latest version of 10963 and now get the following doctest failures:
sage t coxeter_group.py ********************************************************************** File "coxeter_group.py", line 69, in sage.combinat.root_system.coxeter_group.CoxeterGroup Failed example: W Expected: Coxeter group over Universal Cyclotomic Field with Coxeter matrix: [1 3 2] [3 1 5] [2 5 1] Got: Permutation Group with generators [(2,6)(3,18)(4,8)(5,9)(7,10)(11,12)(13,14)(17,21)(19,23)(20,24)(22,25)(26,27)(28,29), (1,4)(2,17)(3,6)(5,7)(9,11)(10,12)(14,15)(16,19)(18,21)(20,22)(24,26)(25,27)(29,30), (1,16)(2,5)(4,7)(6,9)(8,10)(11,13)(12,14)(17,20)(19,22)(21,24)(23,25)(26,28)(27,29)] ********************************************************************** 1 item had failures: 1 of 18 in sage.combinat.root_system.coxeter_group.CoxeterGroup [29 tests, 1 failure, 15.61 s] sage t coxeter_matrix.py [10 tests, 0.42 s] sage t dynkin_diagram.py [104 tests, 0.91 s] sage t hecke_algebra_representation.py ********************************************************************** File "hecke_algebra_representation.py", line 344, in sage.combinat.root_system.hecke_algebra_representation.HeckeAlgebraRepresentation.Tw Failed example: x = KW.an_element(); x Expected: B[123121] + 2*B[12312] + 3*B[12321] + B[123] Got: 2*B[12321] + 3*B[1231] + B[123] + B[] ********************************************************************** File "hecke_algebra_representation.py", line 726, in sage.combinat.root_system.hecke_algebra_representation.HeckeAlgebraRepresentation.Y_eigenvectors Failed example: [E[w] for w in W] Expected: [B[2121], B[2121] + B[121], B[2121] + B[212], (q2/(q1+q2))*B[2121] + ((q2)/(q1+q2))*B[121]  B[212] + B[12], ((q2^2)/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[2121]  B[121] + (q2^2/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[212] + B[21], ((q1^2+q2^2)/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[2121] + ((q1^2q2^2)/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[121] + ((q2^2)/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[212] + (q2^2/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[12]  B[21] + B[1], (q2/(q1q2))*B[2121] + (q2/(q1+q2))*B[121] + (q2/(q1+q2))*B[212]  B[12] + ((q2)/(q1+q2))*B[21] + B[2], B[2121]  B[121]  B[212] + B[12] + B[21]  B[1]  B[2] + B[]] Got: [B[2121]  B[121]  B[212] + B[12] + B[21]  B[1]  B[2] + B[], B[2121] + B[212], (q2/(q1q2))*B[2121] + (q2/(q1+q2))*B[121] + (q2/(q1+q2))*B[212]  B[12] + ((q2)/(q1+q2))*B[21] + B[2], ((q2^2)/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[2121]  B[121] + (q2^2/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[212] + B[21], ((q1^2+q2^2)/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[2121] + ((q1^2q2^2)/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[121] + ((q2^2)/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[212] + (q2^2/(q1^2+q1*q2q2^2))*B[12]  B[21] + B[1], B[2121], (q2/(q1+q2))*B[2121] + ((q2)/(q1+q2))*B[121]  B[212] + B[12], B[2121] + B[121]] ********************************************************************** 2 items had failures: 1 of 19 in sage.combinat.root_system.hecke_algebra_representation.HeckeAlgebraRepresentation.Tw 1 of 15 in sage.combinat.root_system.hecke_algebra_representation.HeckeAlgebraRepresentation.Y_eigenvectors [286 tests, 2 failures, 7.72 s]
comment:51 followup: ↓ 52 Changed 8 years ago by
Do you have Coxeter3 installed? This might account for the first error (in which case, it is an unrelated error I need to fix). The latter two errors seem to be reordering, and if so, likely comes from the version bump of GAP.
comment:52 in reply to: ↑ 51 Changed 8 years ago by
Replying to tscrim:
Do you have Coxeter3 installed? This might account for the first error (in which case, it is an unrelated error I need to fix). The latter two errors seem to be reordering, and if so, likely comes from the version bump of GAP.
I do have coxeter3 installed. The second error is not a reordering, but I guess just a different element.
comment:53 Changed 8 years ago by
Thanks for doing the merge!
I'll work on those failing tests and more importantly on the issue reported by Volker as soon as I can raise the head from #10963.
comment:54 Changed 8 years ago by
The new GAP does indeed pick different generators for groups. In fact, this happened a while ago and we missed a number of GAP version updates.
comment:55 followup: ↓ 56 Changed 8 years ago by
 Commit changed from 9d365416bb2bceae585b0c456d2ea2abc758f94f to 96ae730a0475ac99cb6c0119d58c9f659e612f1e
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
96ae730  updated docs in hecke_algebra_representation

comment:56 in reply to: ↑ 55 Changed 8 years ago by
I get similar errors to what Volker indicated:
sage t long non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.py ********************************************************************** File "non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.py", line 200, in sage.combinat.root_system.non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials Failed example: T._test_relations() # long time (1.3s) Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 480, in _run self.execute(example, compiled, test.globs) File "/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 839, in execute exec compiled in globs File "<doctest sage.combinat.root_system.non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials[30]>", line 1, in <module> T._test_relations() # long time (1.3s) File "/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/combinat/root_system/hecke_algebra_representation.py", line 471, in _test_relations tester.assertEqual(x, y) File "/Applications/sage/local/lib/python/unittest/case.py", line 515, in assertEqual assertion_func(first, second, msg=msg) File "/Applications/sage/local/lib/python/unittest/case.py", line 508, in _baseAssertEqual raise self.failureException(msg) AssertionError: (q1^2*q2^2q1*q2^3)*B[e[0]  e[1] + 2*e['delta']] + (q1^2*q2^2q1*q2^3)*B[e[0] + e['delta']  e[1]] + (q1*q2^3)*B[2*e[1] + 2*e['delta']] + (q1^2*q2^2q1*q2^3)*B[e['delta']] != (q1^2*q2^22*q1*q2^3q2^4)*B[e[0]  e[1] + 2*e['delta']] + (q1*q2^3+q2^4)*B[e[0] + 2*e['delta']  e[1]] + (q1^2*q2^2q1*q2^3)*B[e[0]  e[1] + e['delta']] + (q1*q2^3)*B[2*e[1] + 2*e['delta']] + (q1^2*q2^2q1*q2^3)*B[e['delta']] ********************************************************************** 1 item had failures: 1 of 432 in sage.combinat.root_system.non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials [562 tests, 1 failure, 453.14 s]  sage t long non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.py # 1 doctest failed  Total time for all tests: 453.4 seconds cpu time: 451.7 seconds cumulative wall time: 453.1 seconds
comment:57 in reply to: ↑ 50 Changed 8 years ago by
Replying to aschilling:
I rebased on the latest version of 10963 and now get the following doctest failures:
sage t coxeter_group.py ********************************************************************** File "coxeter_group.py", line 69, in sage.combinat.root_system.coxeter_group.CoxeterGroup Failed example: W Expected: Coxeter group over Universal Cyclotomic Field with Coxeter matrix: [1 3 2] [3 1 5] [2 5 1] Got: Permutation Group with generators [(2,6)(3,18)(4,8)(5,9)(7,10)(11,12)(13,14)(17,21)(19,23)(20,24)(22,25)(26,27)(28,29), (1,4)(2,17)(3,6)(5,7)(9,11)(10,12)(14,15)(16,19)(18,21)(20,22)(24,26)(25,27)(29,30), (1,16)(2,5)(4,7)(6,9)(8,10)(11,13)(12,14)(17,20)(19,22)(21,24)(23,25)(26,28)(27,29)] **********************************************************************
See #15910 regarding this doctest failure. It has nothing to do with this ticket.
comment:58 followup: ↓ 59 Changed 8 years ago by
Hi!
Thanks to JeanBaptiste's mac, I have been able to reproduce and analyze the bug reported by Volker. At the end of the day, it's a combination of:
 CombinatorialFreeModule? still computing hash values for elements from their _repr_ (yikes)
 CombinatorialFreeModule? being somewhat lax in input checking, leading to things like mixes of int's and Integer's in the support of elements.
 The root system code introducing those int's and Integer's in the first place
 sort giving different results for mixed lists containing strings and integers, depending on whether some of those integers are int's or Integer's
Thus the odds of things going wrong were low, which is why this remained unnoticed for so long. Why did this only appear on certain platforms? Well, the result of
sage: sorted([int(0), 'delta', 1]) [0, 1, 'delta']
is not the same on my Linux and JeanBaptiste's Mac.
Probably, with some other doctests, the problem would have instead appeared on my machine and not on others.
I assume that (finally!) implementing a proper hash function for CombinatorialFreeModule? elements should do the job. But that will be for another day. Yawn ....
In any cases, no worry to have: as I expected this has nothing to do with #10963.
Cheers,
Nicolas
comment:59 in reply to: ↑ 58 Changed 8 years ago by
Great that you figured it out!
Anne
comment:60 Changed 8 years ago by
 Commit changed from 96ae730a0475ac99cb6c0119d58c9f659e612f1e to ea4af15ac39244296094c00eef12ad0204298f01
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
8e83e42  Axioms: primer: specifying the category of a parent and using it to add code + promise thingy

5ab0a43  Axioms: improvements to the primer and documentation following Darij's suggestions

d6a0e60  Axioms: Fixed some unused imports in categories

914d5f0  Axioms: documentation: systematic check about full vs non full subcategories + minor improvements

3e6ced8  Merge branch 'categories/axioms10963' into ticket/14102

1afc63b  Axioms: fixed documentation compilation

82702c9  Merge branch 'ticket/10963' into ticket/14102

e8fe5eb  Trac 15931: implement a proper hash function for (combinatorial) free module elements

e6ef605  Trac 15931: add a @cached_method on the new hash function for (combinatorial) free module elements

ea4af15  Merge branch 'ticket/15931hashfree_module' into ticket/14102

comment:61 Changed 8 years ago by
 Created changed from 02/12/13 15:58:07 to 02/12/13 15:58:07
 Modified changed from 03/13/14 16:37:01 to 03/13/14 16:37:01
I merged in the latest version of #10963 (it was a pain to recompile everything everytime I switched between this, develop, or #10963; and
I also merged in #15931, which should fix the bug reported on 46. As a bonus:
sage t non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.py # Before [533 tests, 54.28 s] sage t non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.py # After [533 tests, 41.98 s]
Anne: could you test?
comment:62 followup: ↓ 63 Changed 8 years ago by
 Dependencies changed from #4327, #14143, #13589, #10963, #14673, #14610, #14775 to #4327, #14143, #13589, #10963, #14673, #14610, #14775, #15931
 Description modified (diff)
comment:63 in reply to: ↑ 62 ; followup: ↓ 64 Changed 8 years ago by
With the current version, the documentation does not build:
[combinat ] reading sources... [ 99%] tableaux [combinat ] reading sources... [100%] words [combinat ] <autodoc>:0: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. [combinat ] <autodoc>:0: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Applications/sage/src/doc/common/builder.py", line 83, in f execfile(sys.argv[0]) File "/Applications/sage/src/doc/common/customsphinxbuild.py", line 185, in <module> sphinx.cmdline.main(sys.argv) File "/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/Sphinx1.1.2py2.7.egg/sphinx/cmdline.py", line 206, in main print >>error File "/Applications/sage/src/doc/common/customsphinxbuild.py", line 165, in write self._write(str) File "/Applications/sage/src/doc/common/customsphinxbuild.py", line 139, in _write self._log_line(line) File "/Applications/sage/src/doc/common/customsphinxbuild.py", line 108, in _log_line raise OSError(line) OSError: [combinat ] <autodoc>:0: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. [rings ] reading sources... [ 92%] sage/rings/quotient_ring_element Error building the documentation. Note: incremental documentation builds sometimes cause spurious error messages. To be certain that these are real errors, run "make docclean" first and try again. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Applications/sage/src/doc/common/builder.py", line 1474, in <module> getattr(get_builder(name), type)() File "/Applications/sage/src/doc/common/builder.py", line 269, in _wrapper getattr(get_builder(document), 'inventory')(*args, **kwds) File "/Applications/sage/src/doc/common/builder.py", line 485, in _wrapper x.get(99999) File "/Applications/sage/local/lib/python/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 554, in get raise self._value OSError: [combinat ] <autodoc>:0: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. make: *** [dochtml] Error 1
But the long test indeed now passes:
anne$ sage t long non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.py Running doctests with ID 2014031311444613a52b2e. Doctesting 1 file. sage t long non_symmetric_macdonald_polynomials.py [562 tests, 273.63 s]  All tests passed!  Total time for all tests: 273.9 seconds cpu time: 269.6 seconds cumulative wall time: 273.6 seconds
comment:64 in reply to: ↑ 63 Changed 8 years ago by
Actually, with the current version of this patch, sage does not even start for me
bytecompiling /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/symbolic/expression_conversions.py to expression_conversions.pyc bytecompiling /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/symbolic/function_factory.py to function_factory.pyc bytecompiling /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/symbolic/integration/integral.py to integral.pyc bytecompiling /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/version.py to version.pyc running install_egg_info Removing /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage6.2.beta4py2.7.egginfo Writing /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage6.2.beta4py2.7.egginfo ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Sage Version 6.2.beta3, Release Date: 20140303 │ │ Type "notebook()" for the browserbased notebook interface. │ │ Type "help()" for help. │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ ┃ Warning: this is a prerelease version, and it may be unstable. ┃ ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Applications/sage/src/bin/sageipython", line 6, in <module> from sage.misc.interpreter import SageTerminalApp File "/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/misc/interpreter.py", line 158, in <module> from IPython.terminal.interactiveshell import TerminalInteractiveShell ImportError: No module named terminal.interactiveshell
comment:65 Changed 8 years ago by
Hmm, Sage starts on my machine. Let's see: does Sage start for you in the branch develop?
I am investigating the doc issue (I in fact get the same problem here).
comment:66 followup: ↓ 67 Changed 8 years ago by
Anne, it looks like you have mixed Sage versions. Did you run make build
? Judging from the error, you need to rebuild IPython (it was upgraded in 6.2.beta4).
comment:67 in reply to: ↑ 66 Changed 8 years ago by
Replying to tscrim:
Anne, it looks like you have mixed Sage versions. Did you run
make build
? Judging from the error, you need to rebuild IPython (it was upgraded in 6.2.beta4).
Yes, I did. Well, something was messed up with my sage. I reinstalled from scratch and ran the tests and now everything works!
comment:68 Changed 8 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:69 Changed 8 years ago by
 Commit changed from ea4af15ac39244296094c00eef12ad0204298f01 to 2837531ce92b27ba95fc5e1c96995365c41f8fc1
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_review
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:
2837531  Trac 14102: fixed broken non raw docstring + typo

comment:70 Changed 7 years ago by
 Commit changed from 2837531ce92b27ba95fc5e1c96995365c41f8fc1 to 741d5a4fbcae4659425de8948be814377026f376
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
338cc5b  trac #16269: Reviewer's remarks

8ac32c2  #16280: Fix call for FiniteEnumeratedSet's of plain Python objects

4e27454  #16280: Trivial doctest fixes

f67d82e  trac #16269: Merged with #16280

0a54b68  Trac 16269: little improvements + line folding in the doctest output

b5ad803  Trac 16269 (or follow up): optimize CartesianProduct._cartesian_product_of_elements

d2bc8b2  Merge cartesian product functionalities from '#16269 and #16288' into categories/axioms10963

e9c3586  Some fixes to the docs and to comments in the code (review patch)

4b21473  Merge branch 'public/ticket/10963docdistributive' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into public/ticket/10963docdistributive

741d5a4  Merge with latest #10963.

comment:71 Changed 7 years ago by
 Commit changed from 741d5a4fbcae4659425de8948be814377026f376 to 1579b88ae54981d43bb709b370dfed9c9ad16a33
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
1579b88  Added back in import statement as per comment.

comment:72 Changed 7 years ago by
I've rebased this off the latest #10963. I've also added back in the import statement in categories/weyl_groups.py
in order for the pieri_factors.py
tests to pass. I believe this was removed prior to my merge, so I'm asking for someone (probably with coxeter3 installed) to doublecheck everything works.
comment:73 followup: ↓ 74 Changed 7 years ago by
 Commit changed from 1579b88ae54981d43bb709b370dfed9c9ad16a33 to c6d57ec0a5207d39d08ae01f6b8555623cea9927
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
c6d57ec  fixed new syntax for crystals in nonsymmetric_macdonald

comment:74 in reply to: ↑ 73 Changed 7 years ago by
Ok, thanks Travis. There were a couple of failing doctests due to the new crystal syntax. I fixed those.
Anne
comment:75 Changed 7 years ago by
 Commit changed from c6d57ec0a5207d39d08ae01f6b8555623cea9927 to 1de1304480a40d8db891b4adfcb806606dc805f5
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
1de1304  Marked long tests and some doc formatting.

comment:76 Changed 7 years ago by
I've doublechecked that all doctests passed. I marked one of them as # long time
and fixed a doc formatting issue that I saw. However I can't verify the doc builds because my docbuild is (still) broken...
comment:77 Changed 7 years ago by
 Commit changed from 1de1304480a40d8db891b4adfcb806606dc805f5 to 8342eb7dd83362d21cba01ec9dac7fec47d7c5fd
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
8342eb7  14102: Proofread latest commits by Travis

comment:78 followup: ↓ 79 Changed 7 years ago by
Hi Anne, Travis,
Thanks for merging in the latest dependencies! I have proofread the changes, and am happy with them, up to one point: in FiniteEnumeratedSets? I'd rather stick to the lazy import. The methods are potencially called repeteadly and reimporting Integer each time could waste time, whereas the lazy import should be resolved only once. I haven't done a benchmark though.
Once this detail is settled, we can go back to positive review!
Cheers,
Nicolas
comment:79 in reply to: ↑ 78 ; followup: ↓ 81 Changed 7 years ago by
Hi Nicolas,
Please change the import in FiniteEnumeratedSets? (Travis changed this, right?).
Thanks!
Anne
Replying to nthiery:
Hi Anne, Travis,
Thanks for merging in the latest dependencies! I have proofread the changes, and am happy with them, up to one point: in FiniteEnumeratedSets? I'd rather stick to the lazy import. The methods are potencially called repeteadly and reimporting Integer each time could waste time, whereas the lazy import should be resolved only once. I haven't done a benchmark though.
Once this detail is settled, we can go back to positive review!
Cheers,
Nicolas
comment:80 Changed 7 years ago by
 Commit changed from 8342eb7dd83362d21cba01ec9dac7fec47d7c5fd to 7285efe502514618c4e04080de2056c91933a062
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7285efe  #14102: reverted a chunk of commit 41768a: lazy import there is slightly preferable

comment:81 in reply to: ↑ 79 Changed 7 years ago by
Replying to aschilling:
Please change the import in FiniteEnumeratedSets? (Travis changed this, right?).
Done!
For the record, here is the result of a quick benchmark I made out of curiosity. For a trivial function, we get a factor of 10 in speed. Of course it's not really representative since in our current use case the methods are not quite as trivial.
""" Comparative benchmark between lazy importing and importing inside a method sage: from test_lazy_import import f,g sage: %timeit f(i) 1000000 loops, best of 3: 197 ns per loop sage: %timeit g(i) 1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.65 µs per loop """ from sage.misc.lazy_import import lazy_import lazy_import('sage.rings.integer', 'Integer', 'LazyInteger') def f(i): return LazyInteger(i) def g(i): from sage.rings.integer import Integer Integer(i)
Btw: it would be nice if pyflakes knew about lazy_import
.
comment:82 Changed 7 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:83 Changed 7 years ago by
 Keywords ICERM2013 added
comment:84 Changed 7 years ago by
That's a good benchmark to know. Thanks Nicolas.
comment:85 Changed 7 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sagepending to sage6.3
comment:86 Changed 7 years ago by
 Commit changed from 7285efe502514618c4e04080de2056c91933a062 to 0d766ab4711e54ece6912381f8d834a27af7e192
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_review
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. Last 10 new commits:
8da7522  Trac 10963: degraded a bit a newly added crosslink to work around 'make docclean; make clean' failure

4ef8b27  Merge branch 'public/ticket/10963docdistributive' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into 10963new

afb911c  corrected conflict resolution

82c8ee0  Merge branch 'public/ticket/10963docdistributive' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into public/ticket/10963docdistributive

96c631f  Merge branch 'develop' into categories/axioms10963

b1a2aed  Trac 10963: two typo fixes to let the pdf documentation compile

c16f18b  Merge branch 'public/ticket/10963docdistributive' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into categories/axioms10963

a38b62c  Merge branch 'public/ticket/10963docdistributive' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into public/ticket/10963docdistributive

b162cfd  Merge branch 'develop' into public/ticket/10963docdistributive

0d766ab  Merge branch 'public/combinat/nonsymmetric_macdonald14102' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into public/combinat/nonsymmetric_macdonald14102

comment:87 Changed 7 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Trivial rebase over latest #10963.
comment:88 followup: ↓ 89 Changed 7 years ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
 Work issues set to docpdf
pdf docs don't build
comment:89 in reply to: ↑ 88 Changed 7 years ago by
Replying to vbraun:
pdf docs don't build
Is this related to this patch? I get the following error:
Overfull \hbox (27.79457pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 5438654386 \T1/ptm/m/it/10 bose=False\T1/pcr/m/n/10 ) [597] [598] [599] [600] [601] [602] [603] [604] [605] [606] Chapter 6. [607] [608] Underfull \hbox (badness 6380) in paragraph at lines 5523555239 []\T1/ptm/m/n/10 Aric Hagberg, Dan Schult and Pieter Swart. NetworkX docume ntation. [Online] Available: Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines 5529155295 []\T1/ptm/m/n/10 Stephen P Borgatti. (1995). Centrality and AIDS. [Online] Available: Underfull \hbox (badness 7558) in paragraph at lines 5529655301 []\T1/ptm/m/n/10 Coen Bron and Joep Kerbosch. (1973). Algorithm 457: Findin g All Cliques of an Underfull \hbox (badness 5667) in paragraph at lines 5529655301 \T1/ptm/m/n/10 Undirected Graph. Commun. ACM. v 16. n 9. pages 575577. ACM P ress. [Online] Available: [609] Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines 5541655420 []\T1/ptm/m/n/10 Fifth Annual Graph Drawing Contest P. Eaded, J. Marks, P.Mu tzel, S. North [610] [611] [612] Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines 5570455709 []\T1/ptm/m/n/10 Computing Tutte Polynomials. Gary Haggard, David J. Pearce and Gordon Royle. Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines 5570455709 \T1/ptm/m/n/10 In ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Volume 37( 3), article 24, 2010. Preprint: [613] [614] [615] (./graphs.ind [616] [617] [618] [619] [620] [621] [622] [623] [624] [625] [626] [627] [628] [629] [630] [631] [632] [633] [634] [635]) [636] (./graphs.aux) ) (see the transcript file for additional information){/usr/local/texlive/2008/te xmfdist/fonts/enc/dvips/base/8r.enc}</usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/ type1/bluesky/cm/cmex10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/blu esky/cm/cmmi10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/c mmi5.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmmi7.pfb>< /usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr10.pfb></usr/local /texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr5.pfb></usr/local/texlive/20 08/texmfdist/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr7.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdi st/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmsy10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/ type1/bluesky/cm/cmsy5.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/blue sky/cm/cmsy7.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/bluesky/ams/ms am10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/bluesky/ams/msbm10.pfb ></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/urw/courier/ucrb8a.pfb></usr/l ocal/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/urw/courier/ucrr8a.pfb></usr/local/tex live/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/urw/courier/ucrro8a.pfb></usr/local/texlive/20 08/texmfdist/fonts/type1/urw/helvetic/uhvb8a.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texm fdist/fonts/type1/urw/helvetic/uhvbo8a.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist /fonts/type1/urw/helvetic/uhvr8a.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/ type1/urw/times/utmb8a.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/urw/ times/utmr8a.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2008/texmfdist/fonts/type1/urw/times/utmr i8a.pfb> Output written on graphs.pdf (640 pages, 2603829 bytes). Transcript written on graphs.log. make: *** [docpdf] Error 1
But as far as I know this branch does not touch graphs.
comment:90 Changed 7 years ago by
The actual error is higher up. The end of the log just shows that the graphs part did build successfully.
comment:91 Changed 7 years ago by
 Commit changed from 0d766ab4711e54ece6912381f8d834a27af7e192 to a0ceb91854a6899d33001c984f709ad5758e8317
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a0ceb91  14102: fixed pdf documentation compilation: citation keys shall not use '_'

comment:92 Changed 7 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:93 Changed 7 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:94 Changed 7 years ago by
 Branch changed from public/combinat/nonsymmetric_macdonald14102 to a0ceb91854a6899d33001c984f709ad5758e8317
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
Anne and Nicolas,
The family returned by NonSymmetricMacdonaldPolynomials? should possess a method that gives direct access to the affine Hecke representation of which it is a basis.
I would like to add symmetric Macdonald polynomials to this patch. It should be straightforward, especially if the AHA representation is at hand.