Opened 9 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#14091 closed defect (fixed)
Fix intersphinx links to the reference manual from other documents
Reported by: | nthiery | Owned by: | mvngu |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | documentation | Keywords: | intersphinx, thematic tutorials |
Cc: | sage-combinat | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
#9128 enabled links to the reference manual from other documents like the thematic tutorials. This import feature is currently broken. Until this is fixed, the updated thematic tutorial index from #14090 will look lame.
The issue to be due to a wrong initialization order for the sphinx app. At least the attached patch, which I am using for now for the Sage-Combinat tutorials, seems to work around it. Probably the sphinx internals were change in the mean time. #13057 may have had an influence too.
Note: I am not suggesting to merge or review the currently attached patch. It's just there to point where the problem seem to be.
Attachments (1)
Change History (8)
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12
comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.1 to sage-6.2
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3
comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4
comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.4 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
This seems to be fixed now. See e.g. the crosslink "Introduction to combinatorics in Sage" which points to the reference manual in:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/thematic_tutorials/index.html
I thus mark this ticket as duplicate. If anyone has an idea of when this was fixed, it would be good to add a ref.