Opened 9 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#13766 closed defect (duplicate)
No conversion from unit group to number field.
Reported by: | mderickx | Owned by: | davidloeffler |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | number fields | Keywords: | |
Cc: | mstreng | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | Marco Streng, Maarten Derickx | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
* already fixed by #13687, apply no patches *
Currently we have:
sage: L.<a>=CyclotomicField(7) sage: a in L.unit_group() False
This is because:
sage: a1=L.unit_group()(a) sage: L(a1) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TypeError Traceback (most recent call last) /Users/maarten/Dropbox/Artikelen/MazurKamiennyDerickx/tex/<ipython console> in <module>() /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/structure/parent.so in sage.structure.parent.Parent.__call__ (sage/structure/parent.c:6820)() /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/structure/coerce_maps.so in sage.structure.coerce_maps.DefaultConvertMap_unique._call_ (sage/structure/coerce_maps.c:3254)() /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/structure/coerce_maps.so in sage.structure.coerce_maps.DefaultConvertMap_unique._call_ (sage/structure/coerce_maps.c:3157)() /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.pyc in _element_constructor_(self, x) 6974 return self._coerce_from_str(x) 6975 else: -> 6976 return self._coerce_non_number_field_element_in(x) 6977 6978 # TODO: /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.pyc in _coerce_non_number_field_element_in(self, x) 5064 except (TypeError, AttributeError), msg: 5065 pass -> 5066 raise TypeError, type(x) 5067 5068 def _coerce_from_str(self, x): TypeError: <class 'sage.groups.abelian_gps.abelian_group_element.AbelianGroupElement'>
* already fixed by #13687, apply no patches *
Attachments (1)
Change History (13)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
- Component changed from PLEASE CHANGE to number fields
- Owner changed from tbd to davidloeffler
- Type changed from PLEASE CHANGE to defect
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
- Cc mstreng added
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
- Summary changed from no conversion from unit group to number field to No conversion from unit group to number field.
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by
comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
Indeed, I can confirm that it works now. I added a patch that contains a doctest in order to make sure this doesn't break in the future.
Changed 8 years ago by
comment:6 Changed 8 years ago by
is there no such doctest in the patch that fixed this?
comment:7 follow-up: ↓ 8 Changed 8 years ago by
Well, I have no idea wich ticket fixed this. And I couldn't find a doctest which tests this somewhere.
comment:8 in reply to: ↑ 7 Changed 8 years ago by
Replying to mderickx:
Well, I have no idea wich ticket fixed this.
And I couldn't find a doctest which tests this somewhere.
Coercion from the abstract unit group to the number field is tested by #13687.
sage: UK.gen(0) + K.one() # coerce abstract generator into number field
Conversion the other way around already had a test.
sage: [UK(u) for u in (x^4-1).roots(K,multiplicities=False)]
The coercion framework will then make sure that "in" also works correctly. I don't think another test is necessary.
Enhancing the documentation by explaining that "in" works in this case is nice, but then make sure the English grammar is correct in the patch as well. And there are issues like the fact that u0^6
may depend on the pari version, since any even exponent is correct, so this test will break later.
I propose to just close this ticket as duplicate instead :)
comment:9 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.9 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:10 Changed 8 years ago by
Ok, I changed it to duplicate/invalid/wontfix and gave it positive review status so that Jeroen can close this.
comment:11 follow-up: ↓ 12 Changed 8 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
(just making it a bit clearer/easier for Jeroen)
comment:12 in reply to: ↑ 11 Changed 8 years ago by
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Reviewers set to Marco Streng, Maarten Derickx
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
This works for me in sage 5.8. This ticket should be closed.