Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#13729 closed defect (fixed)
Update pynac to 0.2.6
Reported by: | burcin | Owned by: | burcin |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.9 |
Component: | symbolics | Keywords: | pynac |
Cc: | kcrisman, benjaminfjones | Merged in: | sage-5.9.beta0 |
Authors: | Burcin Erocal, Sebastien Gouezel | Reviewers: | François Bissey |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | #13262 | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
Pynac 0.2.6 is out with fixes for
- #13609: normalization of content in
GF(2^k)
leads to infinite loop - #13587: invalid cancellation of infinities
- #13262: Fix printing of parenthesis around exponents of power objects.
Tarball is available here:
http://pynac.org/download/pynac-0.2.6.tar.bz2
New spkg: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jpflori/pynac-0.2.6.spkg
Change History (17)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
- Cc kcrisman added
comment:2 follow-up: ↓ 4 Changed 9 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
burcin is pynac upstream, do you mean the ginac upstream from pynac?
comment:4 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to kcrisman:
Btw, do any of these need to be reported upstream?
If upstream = GiNaC: No, these are all messes we created. :) GiNaC does not have coefficients in GF(2)
or infinities. Our printing methods are also different.
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by
I've uploaded an updated spkg using the tarball Burcin provided at http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jpflori/pynac-0.2.6.spkg
I've not run the whole testsuite yet, only the symbolic directory, but there seems to be problems left with parenthesis around exponents (#13262), let's hope I messed something.
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
Ok, my bad, my patch queue was not completely pushed :)
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
- Cc benjaminfjones added
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by
What is missing for this ticket to be positively reviewed? Things works fine for me provided that I apply #13262 to fix the latex output in doctests.
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by
- Reviewers set to François Bissey
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
I am putting this to positive review. It can go in with #13262 independently of the other 2 as far as I can see.
comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.8 to sage-5.9
comment:12 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_info
What's there to merge?
comment:13 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Status changed from needs_info to needs_review
It is indeed missing from the summary. Jean-Pierre Flori made a spkg. Now linked in the summary.
comment:14 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:15 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
sage -t devel/sage/sage/symbolic/relation.py ********************************************************************** File "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/relation.py", line 247, in sage.symbolic.relation Failed example: latex(x^(3/5) >= pi) Expected: x^{\left(\frac{3}{5}\right)} \geq \pi Got: x^{\frac{3}{5}} \geq \pi **********************************************************************
sage -t devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx ********************************************************************** File "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx", line 627, in sage.symbolic.expression.Expression._latex_ Failed example: latex((x^(pi+1))^e) Expected: {\left(x^{{\left(\pi + 1\right)}}\right)}^{e} Got: {\left(x^{\pi + 1}\right)}^{e} **********************************************************************
comment:16 Changed 9 years ago by
- Dependencies set to #13262
- Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
Yes. It needs to be applied at the same time as #13262 which does fix that. Not sure why it was split. Sorry for losing your time by not updating the ticket description clearly enough.
comment:17 Changed 9 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.9.beta0
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Btw, do any of these need to be reported upstream?