Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#13669 closed defect (fixed)
sage -gdb ImportError
Reported by: | vbraun | Owned by: | leif |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.6 |
Component: | scripts | Keywords: | |
Cc: | jdemeyer | Merged in: | sage-5.6.beta2 |
Authors: | Volker Braun | Reviewers: | Simon King |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
I get the following with sage-5.4.rc2:
[patchbot@volker-desktop sage-5.4.rc2]$ ./sage -gdb ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Sage Version 5.4.rc2, Release Date: 2012-10-18 | | Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface. | | Type "help()" for help. | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************************************************************** * * * Warning: this is a prerelease version, and it may be unstable. * * * ********************************************************************** /mnt/storage2TB/patchbot/Sage/sage-5.4.rc2/local/bin/sage-ipython GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (7.4.50.20120120-52.fc17) Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>... Reading symbols from /mnt/storage2TB/patchbot/Sage/sage-5.4.rc2/local/bin/python...done. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Python 2.7.3 (default, Oct 30 2012, 10:13:41) [GCC 4.7.2 20120921 (Red Hat 4.7.2-2)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ImportError Traceback (most recent call last) /mnt/storage2TB/patchbot/Sage/sage-5.4.rc2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/IPython/ipmaker.pyc in force_import(modname, force_reload) 61 reload(sys.modules[modname]) 62 else: ---> 63 __import__(modname) 64 65 ImportError: No module named ipy_profile_sage Error importing ipy_profile_sage - perhaps you should run %upgrade? WARNING: Loading of ipy_profile_sage failed. sage:
Apply
- trac_13669_fix_sage_gdb.patch to the
SAGE_ROOT
repo, - trac_13669_bin_remove_sage-gdb.patch to the
local/bin
repo.
Attachments (2)
Change History (17)
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
Changed 8 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by
- Cc jdemeyer added
- Description modified (diff)
- Status changed from new to needs_review
The patch rewires sage -gdb
to use local/bin/sage-ipython
, so the behavior will match the standard sage behavior more closely.
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by
The Patch Buildbot can't apply the patchs:
hg qimport http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/13669/trac_13669_fix_sage_gdb.patch adding trac_13669_fix_sage_gdb.patch to series file hg qpush applying trac_13669_fix_sage_gdb.patch unable to find 'spkg/bin/sage' for patching 1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file spkg/bin/sage.rej
As say in http://wiki.sagemath.org/buildbot,
Only the devel repository has branches, so the buildbot is unable to apply and try out patches to extcode/scripts/etc.
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by
What should be done to review the patches?
From looking at them, they seem good to me, but I am no expert for gdb. And I can confirm that "sage -gdb" now starts without error, in the sense of "I was able to do some non-trivial computation in an interactive session and quit Sage without gdb complaining".
But is that enough to constitute a positive review?
comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by
I don't think there is anything to review, nor does this have anything to do with gdb really. Its just about starting up Python in the same way with or without gdb. The old sage-gdb script was very hackish.
comment:6 Changed 8 years ago by
./sage -t -gdb devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py
works as well.
Slight complaint: ./sage -gdb -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py
does not work.
Would it be possible to make the options -gdb and -t commute?
comment:7 Changed 8 years ago by
The option parsing in general should be overhauled and probably based on the argparse Python module. Right now its a pain to extend the way options work.
comment:8 Changed 8 years ago by
See #21
comment:9 Changed 8 years ago by
So, here's your chance to fix a two-digit ticket...
comment:10 Changed 8 years ago by
Q: How many Sage contributors does it take to change a light bulb?
A: While looking at the broken light bulb we noticed some paint peeling on the wall, so we should probably re-do the foundation of the house first.
comment:11 Changed 8 years ago by
The patches, when chosing to the right repositories, cleanly apply, and sage -gdb does start fine.
I'd say this is enough for a positive review.
comment:12 Changed 8 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Simon King
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:13 Changed 8 years ago by
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
Please use proper quoting:
gdb -x "$SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/sage-gdb-commands" -args python "$SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/sage-ipython" "$@" -i
comment:15 Changed 8 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.6.beta2
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Initial patch