Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#13554 closed defect (duplicate)
Documentation of random_matrix insists zero is never used, when it is.
Reported by: | JoalHeagney | Owned by: | mvngu |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | documentation | Keywords: | duplicate |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | Rob Beezer | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
In the documentation for random_matrix http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/matrix/constructor.html#sage.matrix.constructor.random_matrix, it states in several locations that for several methods, entries are never zero. The examples themselves show plenty of zero entries.
Change History (11)
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by
- Priority changed from major to minor
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by
Thanks rbeezer. Closed as a duplicate of #11968
Version 0, edited 7 years ago
by
(next)
comment:4 follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed 7 years ago by
- Keywords duplicate added; matrix matrices random_matrix documentation removed
- Owner changed from mvngu to JoalHeagney
Aaaaghh. How do I close a ticket?
comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by
- Owner changed from JoalHeagney to mvngu
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 7 years ago by
Replying to JoalHeagney:
Aaaaghh. How do I close a ticket?
You can't. And are not suppose to. The release manager will. ;-)
See process/suggestion in last comment on #6003.
comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.5 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
comment:8 Changed 7 years ago by
Got it.
comment:9 Changed 7 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:10 Changed 7 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Rob Beezer
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:11 Changed 7 years ago by
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
This would have some overlap with #11968. Maybe one or the other should be closed as a duplicate with a pointer to whichever one is kept.