Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #13360, comment 18


Ignore:
Timestamp:
08/13/12 18:26:50 (9 years ago)
Author:
nbruin
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #13360, comment 18

    initial v1  
    1111
    1212It would only work for base rings that don't have a generator named `t` in them
    13 already. So for any of `Q['t','s']['a','b']`, `QuadraticField(5,name='t')` etc.,
    14 this would give a different answer than the functiorial one you're expecting.
     13already. So for any of
     14{{{
     15Q['t','s']['a','b']
     16`QuadraticField(5,name='t')
     17PowerSeriesRing(QQ,name='t')['u','v']
     18}}}
     19this would give a different answer than the functorial one you're expecting.
    1520
    16 The fact that sage attaches meaning to print names of variables really does have
    17 some profound effects.
     21The fact that sage attaches meaning to print names of variables really does have some profound effects.
    1822
    1923> I know that one could probably work around this by
     
    2226> }}}
    2327
    24 Indeed. It's much better to be explicit
    25 than making the system guess where you want your answer to live.
     28Indeed. It's much better to be explicit than making the system guess where you want your answer to live.
    2629
    2730I would probably do