Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #13137, comment 61


Ignore:
Timestamp:
01/04/13 19:26:08 (9 years ago)
Author:
kcrisman
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #13137, comment 61

    initial v1  
    1 Notwithstanding, Sage passes all (not long) tests even with that on my Mac.  Maybe that's good enough.
     1Notwithstanding, Sage passes all (not long) tests even with that on my Mac, as well as on sage.math.  Maybe that's good enough for this ticket.
     2
     3----
     4
    25> Just FYI, it seems to me that we should quite quickly get rid of zn_poly spkg.
    36> Not sure the spkg will be used at all when FLINT gets updated to 2.3, see #12173 which is definitely more than ready for review.
    4 I don't notice any talk there about getting rid of it, though I see the name changes.  That said, there are only three files in `module_list.py` which include `zn_poly` in their library list, and then there is the whole sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/hypellfrob/ folder, also by David Harvey.  It does appear that "zn_poly is no longer maintained" and the latest version is included in FLINT - has been since 2009, huh.
     7I don't notice any talk there about getting rid of it, though I see the name changes.  That said, there are only three files in `module_list.py` which include `zn_poly` in their library list, and then there is the whole sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/hypellfrob/ folder, also by David Harvey, which definitely depends on it.  It does appear that "zn_poly is no longer maintained" and the latest version was included in FLINT - has been since 2009, huh.  I assume its functionality is still in the "complete rewrite" of FLINT 2.x?