Opened 7 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#13075 closed enhancement (fixed)
Toroidal6RegularGrid2dGraph
Reported by: | ncohen | Owned by: | jason, ncohen, rlm |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.5 |
Component: | graph theory | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | sage-5.5.rc0 | |
Authors: | Nathann Cohen | Reviewers: | David Coudert |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | #13067 | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
Ooch. This patch implements a method with a nasty name. With this one can create 6-regular grids on the torus, and have some acceptable drawing.
It also modifies the embedding of ToroidalGrid2dGraph, as some edges did not appear on the drawing.
Nathann
Attachments (1)
Change History (17)
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_info
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_info to needs_review
That's rather true... After trying to find an intermediate solution, I ended up renaming the function. It makes more sense like that :-)
I hope that everything is running smoothly on your side ! I am now back from asia and I work in Paris :-)
Nathann
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Summary changed from ToroidalHexagonalGrid2dGraph to Toroidal6RegularGrid2dGraph
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by
- Reviewers set to David Coudert
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
Hello,
I was about to write a small review patch to add:
- a space between i and \in (same for j) since otherwise i and in are glued when asking for the doc of the function.
- to write
`((i+1)%n_1, (j+1)%n_2`
so add ().
But then I found a problem in the method as well as for ToroidalGrid2dGraph
, Grid2dGraph
, and certainly others: I'm able to call graphs.Toroidal6RegularGrid2dGraph(-1,2)
without warnings! O_o
For which values of n1 and n2 are these methods defined? So far, I'm able to produce a graph that is not 6-regular.
David.
comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
Oh, right. Well, I added what you asked, in this new function and also in Grid2dGraph :-)
Nathann
comment:7 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
That's much better now.
comment:8 Changed 6 years ago by
Thanks ! I'm reimplementing something to compute the girth with static_sparse_graph, because of the conversations on sage-devel these days :-)
It's good to write a piece of code knowing it will not have to be changed later :-)
Nathann
comment:9 Changed 6 years ago by
- Dependencies changed from 13067 to #13067
comment:10 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.4 to sage-5.5
comment:11 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
The documentation doesn't build correctly:
/release/merger/sage-5.5.beta2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/graphs/graph_generators.py:docstring of sage.graphs.graph_generators.GraphGenerators.Toroidal6RegularGrid2dGraph:16: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
and
! Extra }, or forgotten $. l.85529 ...ordinates $(i,j)$ for $i \in \{0...i-1} $ ? ! Emergency stop. l.85529 ...ordinates $(i,j)$ for $i \in \{0...i-1} $ ! ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
comment:12 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
Gloops. LaTeX does not like "%" much, and there was a "::" where it should not be. Sorry about that, I just fixed it !
Nathann
comment:13 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
The PDF still doesn't work.
comment:14 Changed 6 years ago by
Are you sure you uploaded the right patch?
comment:15 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
~$ md5sum trac_13075.patch /tmp/a.patch 2996688ca9b0d1b325e406f054bdca9a trac_13075.patch db9c6e30a366712c2c979dfb6805f94f /tmp/a.patch
Ahem. Sorry again >_<
Nathann
Changed 6 years ago by
comment:16 Changed 6 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.5.rc0
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Hi Nathann,
I looked at the patch and found the modified layout of
ToroidalGrid2dGraph
better.For a hexagonal grid graph, can you give some reference with the definition you are using? Your graph is 6-regular while several other definitions are 3-regular. For example, see article 1203.0666v1, section 5, from arXiv.org, or http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HexagonalGrid.html. I am confused ;-)
Birk