Opened 7 years ago
Last modified 5 years ago
#13066 new enhancement
methods in Graphics are inconsistent
Reported by: | ppurka | Owned by: | jason, was |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-6.4 |
Component: | graphics | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
There is a lot of inconsistency between the methods in Graphics
class. Is there any reason to not have the methods be better named? The old method names could be still kept around for backward compatibility.
old_method -> new method(s)
aspect_ratio -> get_aspect_ratio
axes* -> get_axes*, set_axes*
fontsize -> get_fontsize, set_fontsize
-> set_minmax_data
legend -> set_legend, get_legend
-> get_legend_options
tick_label_color -> set_tick_label_color, get_tick_label_color
xmax/xmin/ymax/ymin -> get/set_xmax/xmin/ymax/ymin
The following methods are good:
get/set_aspect_ratio
get/set_axes_range
set_legend_options
Actually, set_legend_options
apparently works like get/set_legend_options
depending on whether an input is provided.
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.1 to sage-6.2
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.