Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #12839, comment 1


Ignore:
Timestamp:
05/25/12 19:07:10 (9 years ago)
Author:
john_perry
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #12839, comment 1

    initial v1  
    1 Correct me if I am wrong, but you cannot have a reduced Groebner basis over a field that is not a ring. Besides, the ideals are ''not'' the same, even if their varieties are.
     1Correct me if I am wrong, but you cannot have a reduced Groebner basis over a ring that is not a field. Besides, the ideals are ''not'' the same, even if their varieties are.
    22
    33Singular seems to feel this way:
     
    1313
    1414Unless I'm wrong, this is not a bug.
     15
     16''Edit:'' I had ring and field switched in the first sentence.