Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#12334 closed enhancement (fixed)
mark all Lie tests as optional "requires LiE" (this is a *very* easy ticket!)
Reported by: | was | Owned by: | mvngu |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-5.1 |
Component: | doctest coverage | Keywords: | sd40.5 |
Cc: | mjo | Merged in: | sage-5.1.beta2 |
Authors: | Michael Orlitzky | Reviewers: | Benjamin Jones |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
Looking at the optional tests of the Lie package, shows many that aren't properly marked with "requires LiE" (and many are):
sage: search_src('optional', 'lie') ... interfaces/lie.py:359: sage: lie._read_info_files(use_disk_cache=False) #optional -- requires LiE interfaces/lie.py:360: sage: lie._trait_names_list #optional interfaces/lie.py:504: sage: lie.trait_names() #optional -- requires LiE interfaces/lie.py:521: sage: lie._an_element_impl() #optional -- requires LiE interfaces/lie.py:533: sage: lie.read(filename) #optional -- requires LiE interfaces/lie.py:534: sage: lie.get('x') #optional
The point of this ticket is to make them all be marked "#optional -- requires LiE". Pretty easy.
I think this ticket should get a positive review even if
sage -t -only_optional=LiE lie.py
doesn't pass. Fixing any failures in the lie interface (if there are any) should be a separate ticket.
Attachments (1)
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
- Cc mjo added
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by
- Keywords sd40.5 added
- Reviewers set to Benjamin Jones
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Patch looks good and I get the same tests passed numbers as Michael at comment 1. Positive review.
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.1.beta2
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
After the patch,