Opened 8 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#12306 closed enhancement (fixed)
Static sparse graphs for fast low-level computations
Reported by: | ncohen | Owned by: | jason, ncohen, rlm |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.0 |
Component: | graph theory | Keywords: | Cernay2012 |
Cc: | dcoudert | Merged in: | sage-5.0.beta5 |
Authors: | Nathann Cohen | Reviewers: | David Coudert |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | #12235 | Stopgaps: |
Description
Helloooooo !!
This extensively documented module implements a very basic data structure for graphs that is helpful for *EFFICIENT* implementations. It was actually used by Sage already in sage.graphs.distances_all_pairs, but it is better to have a proper documentation for such things.
And of course, this does not solve the current lack of a Python-level static graph class, that would handle loops/multiedges and labels... It will come, though :-)
Nathann
Attachments (2)
Change History (13)
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by
Oopps.. This patch needs #12235 to be applied first, though it is now merged with beta2 :-)
Nathann
comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by
- Reviewers set to David Coudert
I can now install the patch with sage-5.0.beta2.
No compilation error. Generation of the documentation is OK.
However, can you improve in section What does it take as input?
the n^2sizeof(...)
and the nsizeof(...). For instance you can add a \cdot between n
and sizeof(...)
.
For functions returning a dictionnary of dictionnary, you should add an extra warning recalling that such structures are huge. I'm not sure most of us can use this for graphs with 10.000 nodes.
Best,
D.
comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by
- Keywords Cernay2012 added
Here it is !!! :-)
I also removed some trailing whitespaces, as I learned here that they were evil :-P
Nathann
Changed 7 years ago by
comment:6 follow-up: ↓ 7 Changed 7 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
I can install both patch correctly and the documentation is now well presented and with enough details.
Good work !
D.
PS: what's the relation between this patch and the Cernay 2012 Music Festival ? ;-)
comment:7 in reply to: ↑ 6 Changed 7 years ago by
PS: what's the relation between this patch and the Cernay 2012 Music Festival ? ;-)
Some snow, and around 10 people in a tower coding Sage patches on their computers :-)
http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/SageCombinatDaysCernay2012
Nathann
comment:8 Changed 7 years ago by
- Dependencies changed from 12235 to #12235
comment:9 Changed 7 years ago by
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
Please fix the commit message of the first patch.
Changed 7 years ago by
comment:10 Changed 7 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
Gloops... Done ! ^^;
Nathann
comment:11 Changed 7 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.0.beta5
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
I'm unable to install the patch on sage-5.0.beta1.
File
digraph.py.rej
: