Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#12252 closed defect (duplicate)
latex(number field) sometimes looks stupid (though is technically correct)
Reported by: | was | Owned by: | davidloeffler |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | number fields | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | David Loeffler | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
For example,
sage: K = NumberField(x^2 +1, 'i'); K Number Field in i with defining polynomial x^2 + 1 sage: latex(K) \Bold{Q}[i]/(i^{2} + 1)
Some might smirk at this. Another worse one:
sage: latex(QuadraticField(-1)) \Bold{Q}[\sqrt{-1}]/(\sqrt{-1}^{2} + 1)
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Summary changed from latex(number field) looks stupid (though is technically correct) to latex(number field) sometimes looks stupid (though is technically correct)
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
The second one is fixed by #12196. The first one isn't changed, but I don't see what's wrong with the current output, to be honest.
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by
David, you are right. This ticket should be closed as a dup.
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.0 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Reviewers set to David Loeffler
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
I think that this is a duplicate of #12196