Opened 8 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#11764 new enhancement
define the class MPolynomial at the top-level
Reported by: | zimmerma | Owned by: | malb |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | trivial | Milestone: | sage-6.4 |
Component: | commutative algebra | Keywords: | |
Cc: | mmezzarobba | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
for univariate polynomials we have the class Polynomial
:
sage: R.<x> = QQ[] sage: isinstance(x+1, Polynomial) True
However for multivariate polynomials we have to write:
sage: R.<x,y> = QQ[] sage: isinstance(x+y, sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial.MPolynomial) True
I suggest MPolynomial
is defined as an alias for
sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial.MPolynomial
so that we can simply write:
sage: R.<x,y> = QQ[] sage: isinstance(x+y, MPolynomial) True
Change History (7)
comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 2 Changed 8 years ago by
comment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 8 years ago by
- Cc mmezzarobba added
Replying to malb:
I think this needs to be discussed on [sage-devel]. Many people are pushing for less stuff in the global namespace so we cannot just add stuff without asking first.
Martin, feel free to forward to sage-devel, since I am not subscribed.
On the other hand for coherence one could replace Polynomial
by sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_ring.Polynomial
.
Paul
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by
comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.1 to sage-6.2
comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3
comment:7 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4
I think this needs to be discussed on [sage-devel]. Many people are pushing for less stuff in the global namespace so we cannot just add stuff without asking first.