#11745 closed enhancement (fixed)
Some more doctests from the book "Calcul mathématique avec Sage"
Reported by: | gconnan | Owned by: | gconnan |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.10 |
Component: | doctest coverage | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | sage-5.10.beta0 | |
Authors: | Guillaume Connan | Reviewers: | Paul Zimmermann |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
The attached patch adds to the Sage testsuite most examples appearing Chapter 9 (EDO, EDP, Recurrence) of the French book Calcul mathématique avec Sage.
Apply trac_11745.patch only.
Attachments (5)
Change History (23)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
- Owner changed from mvngu to gconnan
Changed 10 years ago by
Changed 10 years ago by
comment:2 in reply to: ↑ description Changed 10 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
Guillaume, which file is to be applied?
Paul
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:4 follow-up: ↓ 15 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
use only the attached file recequadiff_doctest.sage
This file has to be put into tests/french_book
, probably after changing the name to
recequadiff.py
. All tests pass with 5.7. I put it as "needs review" so that people can
comment.
Paul
PS: I do this for Guillaume who cannot login any more on trac.
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by
- Type changed from PLEASE CHANGE to enhancement
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
Additions to Sage should be patches to the Sage library (in devel/sage). See http://sagemath.org/doc/developer/
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Paul Zimmermann
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
I give a positive review. In fact it is enough to test the single (attached) file, since it does not change any functionality in Sage, it does only add some more doctests.
Nevertheless I did run all doctests (with Sage 5.7) and they all pass.
Paul
PS: note I am a co-author of the french book. I hope it does not make a problem if I review this ticket. We should soon publish the book on paper, and thus we would like to ensure our examples will still run in future versions of Sage.
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by
Paul: as I already said to you by e-mail, be sure to run the test with --warn-long
and mark any tests taking a long time as # long time
.
comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by
Jeroen, the --warn-long
option does not seem to work with 5.7 nor 5.8:
tarte% ../../../../../sage -t --warn-long recequadiff.py sage -t --warn-long "devel/sage-11745/sage/tests/french_book/recequadiff.py" Usage: sage-doctest [same options as sage -t] filenames [0.1 s] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The following tests failed: sage -t --warn-long "devel/sage-11745/sage/tests/french_book/recequadiff.py" Total time for all tests: 0.2 seconds
Paul
comment:12 Changed 9 years ago by
True, it was introduced in sage-5.9.beta0.
comment:13 Changed 9 years ago by
Anyway on my machine (which is an Intel Core 2) numbertheory.py
takes
about 15 seconds, polynomes.py
about 5 seconds, and recequadiff.py
about 13 seconds (without -long
). Is that reasonable?
Paul
comment:14 Changed 9 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.9 to sage-5.10
comment:15 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to zimmerma:
This file has to be put into
tests/french_book
, probably after changing the name torecequadiff.py
.
Let me just mention that there is no requirement from me to rename that file. It would have been fine to keep the name recequadiff_doctest.sage
(maybe that's easier for you?)
comment:16 Changed 9 years ago by
since the first files in tests/french_book
are named xxx.py
, for coherence it is better to use similar names.
Paul
comment:17 Changed 9 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-5.10.beta0
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
comment:18 Changed 8 years ago by
we have a new patch without the executable bit, and with ...
replaced by ....:
,
should be attach it here or in a new ticket?
Paul
Replying to gconnan: