Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 8 years ago
#11705 closed enhancement
Port Sage to SUSE Linux Power 7 (ppc64). — at Version 31
| Reported by: | William Stein | Owned by: | David Kirkby |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-6.4 |
| Component: | porting | Keywords: | sd32 sd35.5 |
| Cc: | Leif Leonhardy, Benjamin Jones, Paul Zimmermann, Mariah Lennox, Jean-Pierre Flori | Merged in: | |
| Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
| Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
| Branch: | Commit: | ||
| Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Status badges
Description (last modified by )
Port Sage so that it builds and passes its full test suite on the new IBM Power 7 architecture running SUSE Linux.
sage-4.8.alpha6 builds on this machine, but there are many test failures, see the comments in this ticket.
Change History (31)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by
fbissey -- do you want an account on skynet, so you can help us with porting to SUSE on a nice new "IBM Power 750 Express server" that we have?
comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by
This is the computer we have access to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/750/index.html
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by
| Cc: | Leif Leonhardy added |
|---|
comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by
We are getting 13 power755 locally but they'll go live at the end of September - I am currently installing a power720 that is meant to be a deployment server. Got a BlueGene?/L and BlueGene?/P as well but that would be another exercise :)
The big pity as far as I am concerned is that there is no Gentoo-prefix for linux-ppc otherwise I could have been up and running faster.
We currently have some power5 575 some of which are running suse 9 and that's awful, the latest gcc I have been able to compile is 4.2.4.
comment:8 follow-up: 9 Changed 11 years ago by
I notice in the build logs that you have gcc-4.6.1 on that box. Is it a manual install of gcc?
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to fbissey:
I notice in the build logs that you have gcc-4.6.1 on that box. Is it a manual install of gcc?
Yes. Here is some info about the machine. If you want an account on it, send me an email and I can arrange it.
wstein@silius:~/silius/sage-4.7.1> cat /etc/issue Welcome to SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1 (ppc64) - Kernel \r (\l). wstein@silius:~/silius/sage-4.7.1> uname -a Linux silius 2.6.32.43-0.4-ppc64 #1 SMP 2011-07-14 14:47:44 +0200 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux wstein@silius:~/silius/sage-4.7.1> gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-4.6.1/ppc64-Linux-power7-suse/libexec/gcc/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.1/lto-wrapper Target: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: /usr/local/gcc-4.6.1/src/gcc-4.6.1/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-as=/usr/local/binutils-2.21/ppc64-Linux-power7-suse-gcc-4.3.4-suse/bin/as --with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/local/binutils-2.21/ppc64-Linux-power7-suse-gcc-4.3.4-suse/bin/ld --with-gmp=/usr/local/mpir-2.4.0/ppc64-Linux-power7-suse-gcc-4.3.4-suse --with-mpfr=/usr/local/mpfr-3.0.1/ppc64-Linux-power7-suse-mpir-2.4.0-gcc-4.3.4-suse --with-mpc=/usr/local/mpc-0.9/ppc64-Linux-power7-suse-mpir-2.4.0-mpfr-3.0.1-gcc-4.3.4-suse --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.6.1/ppc64-Linux-power7-suse Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.1 (GCC)
comment:10 Changed 11 years ago by
comment:11 Changed 11 years ago by
| Cc: | Benjamin Jones added |
|---|
comment:12 Changed 11 years ago by
| Keywords: | sd32 added |
|---|
comment:13 Changed 11 years ago by
I was trying to find a way to run the install of maxima through gdb and I got this
fbissey@silius:~/sage-4.7.2.alpha2> ./sage -gdb ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Sage Version 4.7.2.alpha2, Release Date: 2011-08-24 | | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************************************************************** * * * Warning: this is a prerelease version, and it may be unstable. * * * ********************************************************************** /home/fbissey/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sage-ipython GNU gdb (GDB) SUSE (7.3-0.6.1) Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "ppc64-suse-linux". For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>... Reading symbols from /home/fbissey/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/python...done. Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/ld64.so.1 Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=9ad9cc2ebe9a93396712a1da1902ce1791d7a01a" Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/power7/libpthread.so.0 Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=b5b6fe2d9c6386464baf451c855d26e32ac8e25f" [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libdl.so.2 Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=0c5e22422f5abdea4081987ec9b7d276a7674246" Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libutil.so.1 Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=d05c063f9c3e2eaf208254f15783e80352551d5d" Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/power7/libm.so.6 Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=0b0eca877c00501c95ef08f9f692405bfbfed207" Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/power7/libc.so.6 Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=68ff029e9f430bd7351521dab154f400b384ff30" Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Sep 12 2011, 02:12:11) [GCC 4.6.1] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. Setting permissions of DOT_SAGE directory so only you can read and write it. Detaching after fork from child process 59250. Detaching after fork from child process 59251. Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=5f55a2213c780d5f9d3ce2cd6a9ef1d4e63b8739" Detaching after fork from child process 59253. sage: install_package(maxima-5.25.1) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- AttributeError Traceback (most recent call last) /home/fbissey/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/<ipython console> in <module>() /home/fbissey/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/structure/element.so in sage.structure.element.Element.__getattr__ (sage/structure/element.c:2794)() /home/fbissey/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/structure/parent.so in sage.structure.parent.getattr_from_other_class (sage/structure/parent.c:2940)() /home/fbissey/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/structure/parent.so in sage.structure.parent.raise_attribute_error (sage/structure/parent.c:2709)() AttributeError: 'sage.rings.real_mpfr.RealLiteral' object has no attribute 'gen'
I have created a spkg with the latest maxima in case that would make a difference but unsurprisingly it doesn't.
comment:14 Changed 11 years ago by
Benjamin posted a test log in #11708, let's analyse it:
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/numerical_sage/cvxopt.rst
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/doc/en/numerical_sage/cvxopt.rst", line 129:
sage: print sol['x'] # ... below since can get -00 or +00 depending on architecture
Expected:
[ 1.00e...00]
[ 1.00e+00]
Got:
[ 9.85e-01]
[ 9.91e-01]
<BLANKLINE>
**********************************************************************
Rather large numerical noise and some formatting noise which is more curious.
There are multiples instances of these errors in that test:
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/elliptic_curves.rst
*** Warning: new stack size = 1098912 (1.048 Mbytes).
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/elliptic_curves.rst", line 299:
sage: E.integral_points(both_signs=True) # about a minute
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_10[3]>", line 1, in <module>
E.integral_points(both_signs=True) # about a minute###line 299:
sage: E.integral_points(both_signs=True) # about a minute
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py", line 5452, in integral_points
w1, w2 = self.period_lattice().basis()
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py", line 2861, in period_lattice
self._period_lattice = PeriodLattice_ell(self)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py", line 231, in __init__
self._ei = self.f2.roots(AA,multiplicities=False)
File "polynomial_element.pyx", line 4850, in sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element.Polynomial.roots (sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.c:31255)
File "real_roots.pyx", line 4115, in sage.rings.polynomial.real_roots.real_roots (sage/rings/polynomial/real_roots.c:36162)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 277, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalField (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:2982)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 441, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalField_class.__init__ (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:3124)
OverflowError: value too large to convert to int
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/elliptic_curves.rst", line 177:
sage: L = E.padic_lseries(5)
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_4[3]>", line 1, in <module>
L = E.padic_lseries(Integer(5))###line 177:
sage: L = E.padic_lseries(5)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padics.py", line 159, in padic_lseries
normalize = normalize, use_eclib=use_eclib)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padic_lseries.py", line 199, in __init__
self._modular_symbol = E.modular_symbol(sign=+1, use_eclib = use_eclib, normalize=normalize)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py", line 1243, in modular_symbol
M = ell_modular_symbols.ModularSymbolSage(self, sign, normalize=normalize)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_modular_symbols.py", line 629, in __init__
self._find_scaling_L_ratio()
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_modular_symbols.py", line 310, in _find_scaling_L_ratio
l1 = self.__lalg__(D)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_modular_symbols.py", line 362, in __lalg__
lv = ED.lseries().L_ratio() # this is L(ED,1) divided by the Neron period omD of ED
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/lseries_ell.py", line 686, in L_ratio
omega = self.__E.period_lattice().basis()[0]
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py", line 2861, in period_lattice
self._period_lattice = PeriodLattice_ell(self)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py", line 231, in __init__
self._ei = self.f2.roots(AA,multiplicities=False)
File "polynomial_element.pyx", line 4850, in sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element.Polynomial.roots (sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.c:31255)
File "real_roots.pyx", line 4141, in sage.rings.polynomial.real_roots.real_roots (sage/rings/polynomial/real_roots.c:36556)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 761, in polynomial_root
return AlgebraicReal(ANRoot(poly, interval, multiplicity))
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 4417, in __init__
self._interval = self.refine_interval(interval, 64)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 4528, in refine_interval
return self._real_refine_interval(interval, prec)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 4621, in _real_refine_interval
raise ValueError, "Refining interval that does not bound unique root!"
ValueError: Refining interval that does not bound unique root!
**********************************************************************
Two potentially separate issues in mpfi and qqbar.py
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx", line 1103:
sage: sage.structure.sage_object.unpickle_all() # (4s on sage.math, 2011)
Expected:
Successfully unpickled ... objects.
Failed to unpickle 0 objects.
Got:
* unpickle failure: load('/home/bjones/.sage/temp/silius/20398/dir_2/pickle_jar/_class__sage_coding_linear_code_LinearCode__.sobj')
* unpickle failure: load('/home/bjones/.sage/temp/silius/20398/dir_2/pickle_jar/_class__sage_crypto_mq_sr_SR_gf2__.sobj')
* unpickle failure: load('/home/bjones/.sage/temp/silius/20398/dir_2/pickle_jar/_class__sage_homology_chain_complex_ChainComplex__.sobj')
* unpickle failure: load('/home/bjones/.sage/temp/silius/20398/dir_2/pickle_jar/_type__sage_coding_binary_code_BinaryCode__.sobj')
* unpickle failure: load('/home/bjones/.sage/temp/silius/20398/dir_2/pickle_jar/_type__sage_matrix_matrix_mod2_dense_Matrix_mod2_dense__.sobj')
Failed:
_class__sage_coding_linear_code_LinearCode__.sobj
_class__sage_crypto_mq_sr_SR_gf2__.sobj
_class__sage_homology_chain_complex_ChainComplex__.sobj
_type__sage_coding_binary_code_BinaryCode__.sobj
_type__sage_matrix_matrix_mod2_dense_Matrix_mod2_dense__.sobj
Successfully unpickled 582 objects.
Failed to unpickle 5 objects.
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 7 in __main__.example_25
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
picklejar failure should be checked against the same error on arm. Possibly a deeper python problem.
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/structure/parent.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/structure/parent.pyx", line 1783:
sage: K.coerce_embedding()
Expected:
Generic morphism:
From: Number Field in a with defining polynomial x^3 + x^2 + 1
To: Real Lazy Field
Defn: a -> -1.465571231876768?
Got:
Generic morphism:
From: Number Field in a with defining polynomial x^3 + x^2 + 1
To: Real Lazy Field
Defn: a -> 0
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 7 in __main__.example_39
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
That's more than large numerical noise, that has to be wrong.
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 1766:
sage: Q
Expected:
[ -0.359210604054 0.569326179705 0.368048420509 0.641385845805]
[ 0.179605302027 -0.144590775798 0.925041158846 -0.301884576418]
[ 0.179605302027 -0.704880032016 0.0774617736597 0.681825307224]
[ 0.898026510134 0.397624633445 -0.0532812182975 0.180566192161]
Got:
[ -0.359210604054 0.569326179705 0.146859067236 0.724753652911]
[ 0.179605302027 -0.144590775798 0.973039543327 0.00543048428303]
[ 0.179605302027 -0.704880032016 -0.141642164231 0.671433967908]
[ 0.898026510134 0.397624633445 -0.107535848925 0.154528570726]
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 1771:
sage: R
Expected:
[ -5.56776436283 2.6940795304 -2.6940795304]
[ 0 -3.56958477752 3.56958477752]
[ 0 0 -9.93013661299e-16]
[ 0 0 0]
Got:
[ -5.56776436283 2.6940795304 -2.6940795304]
[ 0 -3.56958477752 3.56958477752]
[ 0 0 9.81879219451e-16]
[ 0 0 0]
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
2 of 40 in __main__.example_31
***Test Failed*** 2 failures.
Some numerical noise but something else is badly wrong in the first one.
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx", line 7722:
sage: M.round(10)
Expected:
[-2.4494897428 0.0 0.0]
[-3.6742346142 0.7071067812 0.0]
[-4.8989794856 1.4142135624 0.0]
Got:
[-2.4494897428 0.0 0.0]
[-3.6742346142 0.7071067812 0.0]
[-4.8989794856 1.4142135624 -0.0]
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
That one is not that worrying, I just wish we could easily deal with 0.0 sign flipping.
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/numerical/optimize.py
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/optimize.py", line 469:
sage: sol['x']
Expected:
(0.999..., 1.000...)
Got nothing
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/optimize.py", line 479:
sage: sol['x']
Expected:
(45.000000..., 6.2499999...3, 1.00000000...)
Got nothing
GLPK Simplex Optimizer, v4.44
6 rows, 3 columns, 8 non-zeros
Preprocessing...
2 rows, 2 columns, 4 non-zeros
Scaling...
A: min|aij| = 2.400e+01 max|aij| = 5.000e+01 ratio = 2.083e+00
GM: min|aij| = 8.128e-01 max|aij| = 1.230e+00 ratio = 1.514e+00
EQ: min|aij| = 6.606e-01 max|aij| = 1.000e+00 ratio = 1.514e+00
Constructing initial basis...
Size of triangular part = 2
* 0: obj = -5.100000000e+01 infeas = 0.000e+00 (0)
* 1: obj = -5.225000000e+01 infeas = 0.000e+00 (0)
OPTIMAL SOLUTION FOUND
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/optimize.py", line 564:
sage: find_fit(data, model)
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_7[5]>", line 1, in <module>
find_fit(data, model)###line 564:
sage: find_fit(data, model)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/numerical/optimize.py", line 655, in find_fit
estimated_params, d = leastsq(error_function, initial_guess, args = (x_data, y_data))
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/scipy/optimize/minpack.py", line 324, in leastsq
raise errors[info][1](errors[info][0])
TypeError: Improper input parameters.
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/optimize.py", line 570:
sage: fit = find_fit(data, f, parameters = [a, b, c], variables = [x], solution_dict = True)
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_7[7]>", line 1, in <module>
fit = find_fit(data, f, parameters = [a, b, c], variables = [x], solution_dict = True)###line 570:
sage: fit = find_fit(data, f, parameters = [a, b, c], variables = [x], solution_dict = True)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/numerical/optimize.py", line 655, in find_fit
estimated_params, d = leastsq(error_function, initial_guess, args = (x_data, y_data))
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/scipy/optimize/minpack.py", line 324, in leastsq
raise errors[info][1](errors[info][0])
TypeError: Improper input parameters.
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/optimize.py", line 571:
sage: fit[a], fit[b], fit[c]
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_7[8]>", line 1, in <module>
fit[a], fit[b], fit[c]###line 571:
sage: fit[a], fit[b], fit[c]
NameError: name 'fit' is not defined
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/optimize.py", line 577:
sage: find_fit(dataprime, a * x * log(b * x), parameters = [a, b], variables = [x])
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_7[10]>", line 1, in <module>
find_fit(dataprime, a * x * log(b * x), parameters = [a, b], variables = [x])###line 577:
sage: find_fit(dataprime, a * x * log(b * x), parameters = [a, b], variables = [x])
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/numerical/optimize.py", line 655, in find_fit
estimated_params, d = leastsq(error_function, initial_guess, args = (x_data, y_data))
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/scipy/optimize/minpack.py", line 324, in leastsq
raise errors[info][1](errors[info][0])
TypeError: Improper input parameters.
**********************************************************************
2 items had failures:
That looks bad we obviously have stuff wrong in scipy.
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/ext/fast_callable.pyx
get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/ext/fast_callable.pyx", line 1445:
sage: square(RIF(-1, 1)).str(style='brackets')
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_50[7]>", line 1, in <module>
square(RIF(-Integer(1), Integer(1))).str(style='brackets')###line 1445:
sage: square(RIF(-1, 1)).str(style='brackets')
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 1425, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalFieldElement.str (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:8979)
File "real_mpfr.pyx", line 1618, in sage.rings.real_mpfr.RealNumber.str (sage/rings/real_mpfr.c:11037)
RuntimeError: Aborted
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
Something miscompiled in mpfr?
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/categories/pushout.py
Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object' in <type 'exceptions.RuntimeError'> ignored
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/categories/pushout.py", line 2421:
sage: F2(QQ).coerce_embedding()
Expected:
Generic morphism:
From: Number Field in a with defining polynomial x^3 - x^2 + 1
To: Real Lazy Field
Defn: a -> -0.7548776662466928?
Got:
Generic morphism:
From: Number Field in a with defining polynomial x^3 - x^2 + 1
To: Real Lazy Field
Defn: a -> 0
**********************************************************************
And we have a repeat of errors from qqbar.py in that test too.
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py
more qqbar.py failuresalong with mpfr/mpfi like in elliptic_curves.rst and some wrong results:
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py", line 854:
sage: L.basis_matrix()
Expected:
[ 2.49021256085505 0.000000000000000]
[0.000000000000000 1.97173770155165]
Got:
[ 1.26920930427955 0.000000000000000]
[0.634604652139777 1.45881661693850]
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py", line 857:
sage: L.basis_matrix(normalised=True)
Expected:
[ 2.49021256085505 0.000000000000000]
[0.000000000000000 -1.97173770155165]
Got:
[0.634604652139777 -1.45881661693850]
[-1.26920930427955 0.000000000000000]
**********************************************************************
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/descent_two_isogeny.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/descent_two_isogeny.pyx", line 1147:
sage: E.sha().an()
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_18[28]>", line 1, in <module>
E.sha().an()###line 1147:
sage: E.sha().an()
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/sha_tate.py", line 392, in an
L1_over_omega = E.lseries().L_ratio()
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/lseries_ell.py", line 686, in L_ratio
omega = self.__E.period_lattice().basis()[0]
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py", line 2861, in period_lattice
self._period_lattice = PeriodLattice_ell(self)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py", line 231, in __init__
self._ei = self.f2.roots(AA,multiplicities=False)
File "polynomial_element.pyx", line 4850, in sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element.Polynomial.roots (sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.c:31255)
File "real_roots.pyx", line 4115, in sage.rings.polynomial.real_roots.real_roots (sage/rings/polynomial/real_roots.c:36162)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 277, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalField (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:2982)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 441, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalField_class.__init__ (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:3124)
OverflowError: value too large to convert to int
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/descent_two_isogeny.pyx", line 1147:
sage: E.sha().an()
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_18[28]>", line 1, in <module>
E.sha().an()###line 1147:
sage: E.sha().an()
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/sha_tate.py", line 392, in an
L1_over_omega = E.lseries().L_ratio()
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/lseries_ell.py", line 686, in L_ratio
omega = self.__E.period_lattice().basis()[0]
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py", line 2861, in period_lattice
self._period_lattice = PeriodLattice_ell(self)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py", line 231, in __init__
self._ei = self.f2.roots(AA,multiplicities=False)
File "polynomial_element.pyx", line 4850, in sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element.Polynomial.roots (sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.c:31255)
File "real_roots.pyx", line 4115, in sage.rings.polynomial.real_roots.real_roots (sage/rings/polynomial/real_roots.c:36162)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 277, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalField (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:2982)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 441, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalField_class.__init__ (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:3124)
OverflowError: value too large to convert to int
**********************************************************************
again and again in that one
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padics.py
There are other errors in that last one but I think they are consequences of previous failures.
Same error in
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_modular_symbols.py
again some other errors that are probably consequences of this particular failure. We get some qqbar.py errors too in that one.
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/lseries_ell.py *** Warning: new stack size = 1001728 (0.955 Mbytes). *** Warning: new stack size = 1002624 (0.956 Mbytes). *** Warning: new stack size = 1010736 (0.964 Mbytes). *** Warning: new stack size = 1114144 (1.063 Mbytes). ********************************************************************** sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_point.py sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/modular_parametrization.py sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/BSD.py sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padic_lseries.py sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/heegner.py sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/sha_tate.py sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/real_lazy.pyx sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py <- what a surprise (got MPFR assertion errors too) sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/totallyreal_rel.py sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_morphisms.pyx sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/real_roots.pyx get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m
some more of the same with qqbar.py and mpfi/mpfr.
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/real_interval_absolute.pyx
get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m
get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/rings/real_interval_absolute.pyx", line 237:
sage: R(1)
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_12[4]>", line 1, in <module>
R(Integer(1))###line 237:
sage: R(1)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/misc/displayhook.py", line 174, in displayhook
print_obj(sys.stdout, obj)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/misc/displayhook.py", line 142, in print_obj
print >>out_stream, `obj`
File "sage_object.pyx", line 154, in sage.structure.sage_object.SageObject.__repr__ (sage/structure/sage_object.c:1463)
File "real_interval_absolute.pyx", line 434, in sage.rings.real_interval_absolute.RealIntervalAbsoluteElement._repr_ (sage/rings/real_interval_absolute.c:4989)
return repr(self._real_mpfi_(RealIntervalField(prec)))
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 1109, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalFieldElement.__repr__ (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:7925)
return self.str(10)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 1434, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalFieldElement.str (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:9075)
return self._str_question_style(base, error_digits, e, prefer_sci)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 1650, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalFieldElement._str_question_style (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:9520)
sig_on()
RuntimeError: Aborted
get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m
mpfr troubles with one backtrace
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/rings/real_interval_absolute.pyx", line 915:
sage: R(10)^-10
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_39[7]>", line 1, in <module>
R(Integer(10))**-Integer(10)###line 915:
sage: R(10)^-10
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/misc/displayhook.py", line 174, in displayhook
print_obj(sys.stdout, obj)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/misc/displayhook.py", line 142, in print_obj
print >>out_stream, `obj`
File "sage_object.pyx", line 154, in sage.structure.sage_object.SageObject.__repr__ (sage/structure/sage_object.c:1463)
File "real_interval_absolute.pyx", line 434, in sage.rings.real_interval_absolute.RealIntervalAbsoluteElement._repr_ (sage/rings/real_interval_absolute.c:4989)
return repr(self._real_mpfi_(RealIntervalField(prec)))
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 1109, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalFieldElement.__repr__ (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:7925)
return self.str(10)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 1434, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalFieldElement.str (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:9075)
return self._str_question_style(base, error_digits, e, prefer_sci)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 1650, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalFieldElement._str_question_style (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:9520)
sig_on()
RuntimeError: Aborted
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/libcsage.so(print_backtrace-0x1cf7c)[0x40000a4e49c]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/libcsage.so(sigdie-0x1cf24)[0x40000a4e50c]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/libcsage.so(sage_signal_handler-0x1d600)[0x40000a4dd88]
[0x40000040418]
[0xfffcd8e00f0]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/libpython2.6.so.1.0(PyString_FromString-0x1346dc)[0x40000132594]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/libpython2.6.so.1.0(PyErr_SetString-0xbeac8)[0x400001aced0]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/libcsage.so(sage_signal_handler-0x1d6c0)[0x40000a4dcc8]
[0x40000040418]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/libgmp.so.3(__gmpz_get_str-0x62970)[0x400013b3cf0]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/libgmp.so.3(__gmpq_get_str-0x55e8c)[0x400013c111c]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/rings/rational.so(+0x2156c)[0x40003b8156c]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/libpython2.6.so.1.0(PyCFunction_Call-0x1459b8)[0x4000011fc80]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/libpython2.6.so.1.0(PyObject_Call-0x18cd08)[0x400000d3590]
/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/rings/rational.so(+0x133cc)[0x40003b733cc]
Also
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/complex_interval.pyx get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m (and a bunch of other errors) sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/misc/functional.py #0: simplify_sum(expr='sum(q^k,k,0,inf)) #1: simplify_sum(expr=a*'sum(q^k,k,0,inf)) get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/real_roots.pyx get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m get_str.c:149: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/lfunctions/sympow.py
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/lfunctions/sympow.py", line 213:
sage: sympow.modular_degree(EllipticCurve('11a'))
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_6[2]>", line 1, in <module>
sympow.modular_degree(EllipticCurve('11a'))###line 213:
sage: sympow.modular_degree(EllipticCurve('11a'))
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/lfunctions/sympow.py", line 229, in modular_degree
raise RuntimeError, "failed to compute modular degree"
RuntimeError: failed to compute modular degree
sympow...
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/interfaces/qepcad.py
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/qepcad.py", line 2045:
sage: x = _eval_qepcad_algebraic('the unique root of 8 x^2 - 8 x - 29 between -47/32 and -1503/1024'); x
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_52[3]>", line 1, in <module>
x = _eval_qepcad_algebraic('the unique root of 8 x^2 - 8 x - 29 between -47/32 and -1503/1024'); x###line 2045:
sage: x = _eval_qepcad_algebraic('the unique root of 8 x^2 - 8 x - 29 between -47/32 and -1503/1024'); x
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/qepcad.py", line 2069, in _eval_qepcad_algebraic
raise ValueError, "%s or %s not an exact floating-point number"%(lbound, ubound)
ValueError: -47/32 or -1503/1024 not an exact floating-point number
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/qepcad.py", line 2047:
sage: 8*x^2 - 8*x - 29 == 0
Expected:
True
Got:
8*x^2 - 8*x - 29 == 0
**********************************************************************
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_rel.py
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_rel.py", line 1876:
sage: L.places()
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_54[3]>", line 1, in <module>
L.places()###line 1876:
sage: L.places()
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_rel.py", line 1899, in places
pl = L.places(all_complex, prec)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 6226, in places
real_intervals = [ x[0] for x in self.defining_polynomial().roots(R) ]
File "polynomial_element.pyx", line 4853, in sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element.Polynomial.roots (sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.c:31307)
File "real_roots.pyx", line 4115, in sage.rings.polynomial.real_roots.real_roots (sage/rings/polynomial/real_roots.c:36162)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 277, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalField (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:2982)
File "real_mpfi.pyx", line 441, in sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalField_class.__init__ (sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:3124)
OverflowError: value too large to convert to int
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/plot/plot3d/list_plot3d.py
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/plot/plot3d/list_plot3d.py", line 102:
sage: list_plot3d(m, texture='yellow', interpolation_type='spline',frame_aspect_ratio=[1,1,1/3])
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_1[9]>", line 1, in <module>
list_plot3d(m, texture='yellow', interpolation_type='spline',frame_aspect_ratio=[Integer(1),Integer(1),Integer(1)/Integer(3)])###line 102:
sage: list_plot3d(m, texture='yellow', interpolation_type='spline',frame_aspect_ratio=[1,1,1/3])
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/plot/plot3d/list_plot3d.py", line 172, in list_plot3d
return list_plot3d_tuples(l,interpolation_type,texture,**kwds)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/plot/plot3d/list_plot3d.py", line 316, in list_plot3d_tuples
s=interpolate.bisplrep(x,y,z,[int(1)]*len(x),xmin,xmax,ymin,ymax,kx=kx,ky=ky,s=s)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/scipy/interpolate/fitpack.py", line 873, in bisplrep
tx,ty,nxest,nyest,wrk,lwrk1,lwrk2)
ValueError: negative dimensions are not allowed
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/plot/plot3d/list_plot3d.py", line 109:
sage: list_plot3d(m, texture='yellow', interpolation_type='spline', degree=5, frame_aspect_ratio=[1,1,1/3])
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_1[10]>", line 1, in <module>
list_plot3d(m, texture='yellow', interpolation_type='spline', degree=Integer(5), frame_aspect_ratio=[Integer(1),Integer(1),Integer(1)/Integer(3)])###line 109:
sage: list_plot3d(m, texture='yellow', interpolation_type='spline', degree=5, frame_aspect_ratio=[1,1,1/3])
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/plot/plot3d/list_plot3d.py", line 172, in list_plot3d
return list_plot3d_tuples(l,interpolation_type,texture,**kwds)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/plot/plot3d/list_plot3d.py", line 316, in list_plot3d_tuples
s=interpolate.bisplrep(x,y,z,[int(1)]*len(x),xmin,xmax,ymin,ymax,kx=kx,ky=ky,s=s)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/scipy/interpolate/fitpack.py", line 873, in bisplrep
tx,ty,nxest,nyest,wrk,lwrk1,lwrk2)
ValueError: negative dimensions are not allowed
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
2 of 26 in __main__.example_1
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/modular/abvar/abvar.py
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/modular/abvar/abvar.py", line 3305:
sage: E.modular_degree()
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_84[8]>", line 1, in <module>
E.modular_degree()###line 3305:
sage: E.modular_degree()
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py", line 3201, in modular_degree
m = sympow.modular_degree(self)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/lfunctions/sympow.py", line 229, in modular_degree
raise RuntimeError, "failed to compute modular degree"
RuntimeError: failed to compute modular degree
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/modular/hecke/submodule.py
**********************************************************************
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-main/sage/modular/hecke/submodule.py", line 511:
sage: EllipticCurve('128a').congruence_number()
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_17[19]>", line 1, in <module>
EllipticCurve('128a').congruence_number()###line 511:
sage: EllipticCurve('128a').congruence_number()
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py", line 3294, in congruence_number
m = self.modular_degree()
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py", line 3201, in modular_degree
m = sympow.modular_degree(self)
File "/tmp/bjones/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/lfunctions/sympow.py", line 229, in modular_degree
raise RuntimeError, "failed to compute modular degree"
RuntimeError: failed to compute modular degree
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 21 in __main__.example_17
come from sympow
So big trouble coming from mpfr or possibly mpir underneath. Once we isolate that most of these will disapear.
comment:15 follow-up: 17 Changed 11 years ago by
comment:16 Changed 11 years ago by
I was hoping the mpir upgrade would deal with some of these. I'd like to try a vanilla compiler from SLES (gfortran is on a separate SDK DVD I discovered).
comment:17 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to jhpalmieri:
With the new mpir spkg from #11964, Sage builds for me on silius, using gcc 4.6.2. I get a lot of test failures, though: I think that many of these are as reported before. See the log for full details.
The following tests failed: sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sagenb-main/sagenb/interfaces/status.py # File not found sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/numerical_sage/cvxopt.rst # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/elliptic_curves.rst # 10 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/modular/hecke/submodule.py # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/modular/abvar/abvar.py # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/numerical/optimize.py # 6 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/misc/functional.py # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/libs/libecm.pyx # Killed/crashed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/categories/pushout.py # 8 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py # 119 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/real_interval_absolute.pyx # 53 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/complex_interval.pyx # 22 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/real_lazy.pyx # 3 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/totallyreal_rel.py # 8 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_morphisms.pyx # 2 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_rel.py # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/misc/randstate.pyx # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/real_roots.pyx # 23 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/structure/parent.pyx # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/lfunctions/sympow.py # 13 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/plot/plot3d/list_plot3d.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/interfaces/qepcad.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padics.py # 10 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padic_lseries.py # 44 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/lseries_ell.py # 3 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_point.py # 9 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/tests/startup.py # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_modular_symbols.py # 16 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/modular_parametrization.py # 4 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/BSD.py # 6 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/descent_two_isogeny.pyx # 2 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/heegner.py # 72 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py # 70 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py # 48 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/sha_tate.py # 40 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/ext/fast_callable.pyx # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/interfaces/psage.py # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py # Time out ----------------------------------------------------------------------
FWIW, I previously managed to reduce the doctest errors to 7 files IIRC; from sage-release (Sage 4.7.2.alpha3 thread):
leif wrote: > > I've also tested on Linux PPC64 (POWER7), but there a lot goes wrong > > (mainly due to a partially broken ECL and Maxima I think), including > > some noise I didn't see on any of the other platforms, e.g. ones that > > don't match "1.00..." because they are slightly *less* than one. P.S.: The following tests even timeout when run individually (with the default timeout of half an hour on a quite fast box) in my current build: sage -t -long -force_lib sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx # Time out sage -t -long -force_lib sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py # Time out Interestingly also sandpile takes a long time, although this is SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1 (ppc64), Kernel version 2.6.32.43-0.4-ppc64 and not Ubuntu. The other failing doctests are in: sage/misc/functional.py # 1 doctests failed (failing MPFR assertion) sage/interfaces/qepcad.py # 2 doctests failed (two funny errors) sage/plot/plot3d/list_plot3d.py # 2 doctests failed (two times "ValueError: negative dimensions are not allowed" in list_plot3d()) Note that there are further doctest errors in the files which timeout, i.e., before tests start to hang. -leif
I unfortunately cannot tell (at least at the moment) how I exactly built that version since I had trouble with various things like GCC 4.4.6 not recognizing -mvsx (which ATLAS uses without first trying whether the command line option is supported) and the PolyBoRi spkg which didn't propagate LIBRARY_PATH etc.
comment:18 Changed 11 years ago by
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:19 Changed 11 years ago by
I have built 5.0.prealpha on one of the power7 box I have access too (not silius). I get the following after running the tests (not in parallel)
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/numerical/optimize.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/misc/functional.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/libs/libecm.pyx" # Killed/crashed
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/categories/pushout.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx" # Time out
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/totallyreal_rel.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx" # Time out
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_morphisms.pyx"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py" # Killed/crashed
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_rel.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/real_interval_absolute.pyx"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/complex_interval.pyx"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/real_lazy.pyx"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx" # Time out
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/real_roots.pyx"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/structure/parent.pyx"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/plot/plot3d/list_plot3d.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/qepcad.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_decompositions/vertex_separation.pyx"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padics.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padic_lseries.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_point.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/lseries_ell.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_modular_symbols.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/modular_parametrization.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/BSD.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/sha_tate.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/heegner.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/descent_two_isogeny.pyx"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/plane_conics/con_number_field.py"
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/ext/fast_callable.pyx"
Total time for all tests: 21029.5 seconds
I cannot really post many details right now but the errors are similar to before. Problems with mpfr and scipy are the main culprits. Some details on the box used:
frb15@p2n14-c /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0 :uname -a Linux p2n14-c 2.6.32.12-0.7-ppc64 #1 SMP 2010-05-20 11:14:20 +0200 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux
and the end of /proc/cpuinfo:
processor : 61 cpu : POWER7 (architected), altivec supported clock : 3300.000000MHz revision : 2.1 (pvr 003f 0201) timebase : 512000000 platform : pSeries model : IBM,8233-E8B machine : CHRP IBM,8233-E8B
comment:20 Changed 11 years ago by
I can supply gdb output for the test that got killed, "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py":
init2.c:52: MPFR assertion failed: p >= 2 && p <= ((mpfr_prec_t)((mpfr_prec_t)(~(mpfr_prec_t)0)>>1))
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00000400004c80e0 in .raise () from /lib64/power7/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000400004c80e0 in .raise () from /lib64/power7/libc.so.6
#1 0x00000400004c9da0 in .abort () from /lib64/power7/libc.so.6
#2 0x0000040004202580 in .mpfr_assert_fail () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.1
#3 0x00000400041f9278 in .mpfr_init2 () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.1
#4 0x00000400041e92c0 in .set_z () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.1
#5 0x00000400041e9424 in .mpfr_set_q () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.1
#6 0x00000400044ba900 in mpfi_interv_q (a=0x1703db98, b=0x17034250, c=0x170342b0) at mpfi.c:3648
#7 0x000004000445b3a0 in __pyx_pf_4sage_5rings_9real_mpfi_24RealIntervalFieldElement___init__ (__pyx_v_self=0x1703db78,
__pyx_args=<value optimized out>, __pyx_kwds=<value optimized out>) at sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:7366
#8 0x000004000017736c in type_call (type=<value optimized out>, args=0x17025500, kwds=0x0) at Objects/typeobject.c:735
#9 0x00000400000ecb3c in PyObject_Call (func=0x4000449c208, arg=0x17025500, kw=0x0) at Objects/abstract.c:2529
#10 0x000004000445e514 in __pyx_pf_4sage_5rings_9real_mpfi_23RealIntervalField_class_9__call__ (__pyx_v_self=0x10ee1c50,
__pyx_args=<value optimized out>, __pyx_kwds=<value optimized out>) at sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:4421
I may try to upgrade mpfi/mpfr to see if it improve things.
comment:21 Changed 11 years ago by
I have updated mpfi and mpfr using #12171 and #11666 and now I am getting a backtrace going back to mpir:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000004000155c604 in .__gmpn_lshift () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libgmp.so.8
(gdb) bt
#0 0x000004000155c604 in .__gmpn_lshift () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libgmp.so.8
#1 0x00000400041efbd0 in .set_z () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.4
#2 0x00000400041efd3c in .mpfr_set_q () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.4
#3 0x00000400044d0580 in mpfi_interv_q (a=0x17033b98, b=0x170342b0, c=0x17034310) at interv_q.c:34
#4 0x000004000446b3a0 in __pyx_pf_4sage_5rings_9real_mpfi_24RealIntervalFieldElement___init__ (__pyx_v_self=0x17033b78,
__pyx_args=<value optimized out>, __pyx_kwds=<value optimized out>) at sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:7366
#5 0x000004000017736c in type_call (type=<value optimized out>, args=0x17025500, kwds=0x0) at Objects/typeobject.c:735
#6 0x00000400000ecb3c in PyObject_Call (func=0x400044ac208, arg=0x17025500, kw=0x0) at Objects/abstract.c:2529
#7 0x000004000446e514 in __pyx_pf_4sage_5rings_9real_mpfi_23RealIntervalField_class_9__call__ (__pyx_v_self=0x10ee1c50,
__pyx_args=<value optimized out>, __pyx_kwds=<value optimized out>) at sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:4421
comment:22 Changed 11 years ago by
Just one more detail on the crash running the test with -verbose to get the failing bit:
Trying:
L = NumberField(x**Integer(3) - Integer(4)*x + Integer(1), embedding = RealNumber('1.86'), names=('b',)); (b,) = L._first_ngens(1)###line 5176:_sage_ >>> L.<b> = NumberField(x^3 - 4*x + 1, embedding = 1.86)
Expecting nothing
ok
Trying:
L(a)###line 5177:_sage_ >>> L(a)
Expecting:
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: Cannot convert a to Number Field in b with defining polynomial x^3 - 4*x + 1 (using the specified embeddings)
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libcsage.so(print_backtrace-0x1cf74)[0x40000a5e1ec]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libcsage.so(sigdie-0x1cf1c)[0x40000a5e25c]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libcsage.so(sage_signal_handler-0x1d370)[0x40000a5dd60]
[0x40000040418]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.4(+0x2fbb0)[0x400040ffbb0]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.4(mpfr_set_q-0x4f1b4)[0x400040ffd3c]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfi.so.0(mpfi_interv_q-0x1b260)[0x400043e0580]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/rings/real_mpfi.so(+0x2b3a0)[0x4000437b3a0]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(+0x11736c)[0x4000017736c]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyObject_Call-0x1bff54)[0x400000ecb3c]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/rings/real_mpfi.so(+0x2e514)[0x4000437e514]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyObject_Call-0x1bff54)[0x400000ecb3c]
The doctested process was killed by signal 11
[5.9 s]
So we are expecting to catch some failure here in the first place and it doesn't go according to plan.
Also I forgot to mention I used the compiler fron SLES rather than compiling a newer version:
gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc64-suse-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/lib64 --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java --enable-checking=release --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.3 --enable-ssp --disable-libssp --with-bugurl=http://bugs.opensuse.org/ --with-pkgversion='SUSE Linux' --disable-libgcj --disable-libmudflap --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --program-suffix=-4.3 --enable-linux-futex --without-system-libunwind --with-cpu=power4 --enable-secureplt --with-long-double-128 --build=powerpc64-suse-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973] (SUSE Linux) gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc64-suse-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/lib64 --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java --enable-checking=release --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.3 --enable-ssp --disable-libssp --with-bugurl=http://bugs.opensuse.org/ --with-pkgversion='SUSE Linux' --disable-libgcj --disable-libmudflap --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --program-suffix=-4.3 --enable-linux-futex --without-system-libunwind --with-cpu=power4 --enable-secureplt --with-long-double-128 --build=powerpc64-suse-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973] (SUSE Linux)
comment:23 Changed 11 years ago by
I am doing a complete test run with the new mpfi/mpfr combo but so far the results don't look any different. I looked a little bit more into the test that timed out (devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx) with verbose and it stops dead there:
Trying:
RIF(Integer(5)).gamma()###line 4133:_sage_ >>> RIF(5).gamma()
Expecting:
24
ok
Trying:
a = RIF(Integer(3),Integer(4)).gamma(); a###line 4135:_sage_ >>> a = RIF(3,4).gamma(); a
Expecting:
1.?e1
I'll look at the other killed test (libecm.pyx) a bit later.
comment:24 Changed 11 years ago by
libecm.pyx doesn't seem to work at all
frb15@p2n14-c /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0 :./sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/libs/libecm.pyx" -verbose
sage -t -long -force_lib -verbose "devel/sage/sage/libs/libecm.pyx"
Trying:
set_random_seed(0L)
Expecting nothing
ok
Trying:
change_warning_output(sys.stdout)
Expecting nothing
ok
Trying:
import sage.libs.libecm###line 14:_sage_ >>> import sage.libs.libecm
Expecting nothing
ok
Trying:
from sage.libs.libecm import ecmfactor###line 15:_sage_ >>> from sage.libs.libecm import ecmfactor
Expecting nothing
ok
Trying:
result = ecmfactor(Integer(999), RealNumber('0.00'))###line 16:_sage_ >>> result = ecmfactor(999, 0.00)
Expecting nothing
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libcsage.so(print_backtrace-0x1cf74)[0x40000a5e1ec]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libcsage.so(sigdie-0x1cf1c)[0x40000a5e25c]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libcsage.so(sage_signal_handler-0x1d370)[0x40000a5dd60]
[0x40000040418]
[0xfffc9771790]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/libs/libecm.so(+0x27c84)[0x4000a207c84]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/libs/libecm.so(ecm-0x657dc)[0x4000a1f60e4]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/libs/libecm.so(ecm_factor-0x6746c)[0x4000a1f43ac]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/libs/libecm.so(+0x133d4)[0x4000a1f33d4]
/hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyCFunction_Call-0x15fed4)[0x40000152c1c]
and from gdb
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x7d0429d27d242810 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x7d0429d27d242810 in ?? ()
#1 0x000004000a5d3f70 in mulredc (z=0x13afdb50, x=<value optimized out>, y=<value optimized out>, m=0x13b05df0, nn=1,
invm=4727093576446091305) at mpmod.c:386
#2 0x000004000a5d7c84 in ecm_mulredc_basecase (R=0xfffffffb080, S1=0xfffffffb1a8, S2=0xfffffffb178, modulus=0xfffffffb130) at mpmod.c:611
#3 0x000004000a5c60e4 in ecm (f=0xfffffffb578, x=0xfffffffb3d8, sigma=0xfffffffb3e8, n=0xfffffffb568, go=0xfffffffb400,
B1done=0xfffffffb410, B1=0, B2min_parm=0xfffffffb418, B2_parm=0xfffffffb428, B2scale=1, k=0, S=0, verbose=0, repr=<value optimized out>,
nobase2step2=0, use_ntt=1, sigma_is_A=0, os=0x4000061d698, es=0x4000061d778, chkfilename=0x0, TreeFilename=0x0, maxmem=0, stage1time=0,
rng=0xfffffffb480, stop_asap=0) at ecm.c:940
#4 0x000004000a5c43ac in ecm_factor (f=0xfffffffb578, n=0xfffffffb568, B1=0, p=0xfffffffb3d0) at factor.c:93
#5 0x000004000a5c33d4 in __pyx_pf_4sage_4libs_6libecm_ecmfactor (__pyx_self=<value optimized out>, __pyx_args=<value optimized out>,
__pyx_kwds=<value optimized out>) at sage/libs/libecm.c:1894
#6 0x0000040000152c1c in PyCFunction_Call (func=0x13aae368, arg=0x13ac1878, kw=<value optimized out>) at Objects/methodobject.c:85
comment:26 Changed 11 years ago by
Strangely enough I now get the following backtrace for real_mpfi.pyx, I have installed texlive in the mean time which may have made a difference.
get_str.c:153: MPFR assertion failed: size_s1 >= m
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00000400004c80e0 in .raise () from /lib64/power7/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000400004c80e0 in .raise () from /lib64/power7/libc.so.6
#1 0x00000400004c9da0 in .abort () from /lib64/power7/libc.so.6
#2 0x00000400042ec060 in .mpfr_assert_fail () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.4
#3 0x00000400042c12fc in .mpfr_get_str_aux () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.4
#4 0x00000400042c1d48 in .mpfr_get_str () from /hpc/scratch/frb15/sandbox/sage-5.0.prealpha0/local/lib/libmpfr.so.4
#5 0x0000040004547ff4 in __pyx_f_4sage_5rings_9real_mpfi_24RealIntervalFieldElement__str_question_style (__pyx_v_self=0x13f47408,
__pyx_v_base=0, __pyx_v_error_digits=0, __pyx_v_e=0x40000646cb0, __pyx_v_prefer_sci=0, __pyx_skip_dispatch=<value optimized out>)
at sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:9727
#6 0x00000400045524f8 in __pyx_pf_4sage_5rings_9real_mpfi_24RealIntervalFieldElement_12str (__pyx_v_self=0x13f47408,
__pyx_args=<value optimized out>, __pyx_kwds=<value optimized out>) at sage/rings/real_mpfi.c:9275
I will move to 5.0.prealpha1 soon.
comment:27 Changed 11 years ago by
| Cc: | Paul Zimmermann added |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | sd35.5 added |
did someone try to compile MPFR 3.1.0 outside from Sage, and run its test suite (make check)? Same for MPFI 1.5.0?
Paul Zimmermann
comment:28 Changed 11 years ago by
note: I just tried MPFR 3.1.0 on top of MPIR 2.1.3 on gcc110.fsffrance.org and "make check" worked.
Paul
comment:29 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to zimmerma:
did someone try to compile MPFR 3.1.0 outside from Sage, and run its test suite (make check)?
I did build both release candidates on Silius (Skynet); all [run] tests passed (although I don't recall with which GCC version; I guess I used my own build of 4.4.6).
I now see at least rc2 passed all tests with 4.3.4 and 4.6.1, too.
Same for MPFI 1.5.0?
Nope.
comment:30 Changed 11 years ago by
Leif,
I did build both release candidates on Silius (Skynet); all [run] tests passed
please could you check again with the 3.1.0 release? Alternatively if I have access to this machine (Silius?) I can try to investigate. William, is it possible?
Paul
comment:31 Changed 11 years ago by
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
I am actually in the process of commissioning such hardware and suse will be on some nodes (Aix 6.1 on the other nodes).