Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#11694 closed defect (duplicate)
Unlabelled edges are doubled when creating multiedge graph
Reported by: | iandrus | Owned by: | iandrus |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | graph theory | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | Ivan Andrus, Nathann Cohen | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
When creating a graph from a list of edges, if the edges are not labelled they get doubled when multiedges are allowed. It works fine if they are labelled.
sage: g=Graph([[1,2],[1,2,],[2,3]]) sage: g.num_edges() 6 sage: g=Graph([[1,2,'a'],[1,2,'b'],[2,3,'c']]) sage: g.num_edges() 3
See #11693.
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-4.7.2 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_info
This ticket definitely isn't needing a review as there is no patch attached. Should it be removed as a duplicated as was done before ?
Nathann
comment:4 follow-up: ↓ 5 Changed 10 years ago by
I think I read somewhere that I should set milestone as duplicate and then make it needs_review so that someone else can actually close it. It should be closed with extreme prejudice.
comment:5 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 10 years ago by
I think I read somewhere that I should set milestone as duplicate and then make it needs_review so that someone else can actually close it. It should be closed with extreme prejudice.
Oh right, right, closing tickets is the release manager's exclusive right, but if this one is to be closed the best may be to send him an email :-)
Nathann
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_info to needs_review
I sent jdemeyer an email.
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Ivan Andrus, Nathann Cohen
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
This is actually a duplicate of #11693, but I didn't realize that.