Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#11626 closed enhancement (duplicate)
make the error function work in arbitrary precision
Reported by: | zimmerma | Owned by: | AlexGhitza |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | basic arithmetic | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | Paul Zimmermann, Karl-Dieter Crisman | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
sage: n(erf(2),54) ... NotImplementedError: erf not implemented for precision higher than 53
However, MPFR contains a multiple precision implementation of erf. It should be straightforward to use.
Paul
PS: maybe this ticket is duplicate. It is not easy to search for erf
in trac, a feature, like grep -w erf
is missing,
and the TracSearch help is not very useful...
Change History (5)
comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 2 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-4.7.2 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Reviewers set to Paul Zimmermann, Karl-Dieter Crisman
- Status changed from new to needs_review
This is then now part of #1173. Putting this as duplicate.
To release manager: positive review as duplicate.
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Does #1173 solve this (it uses mpmath)? It's certainly possible there to do
erf(2).n(54)
or such, not sure about your syntax as I don't have a Sage install with this patch currently. But this should do it.You are certainly correct about searching Trac. Sorry that neither this ticket nor #1173 can address that :)