Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 10 years ago
#11616 closed enhancement
Upgrade MPIR to a more recent upstream release — at Version 47
Reported by: | leif | Owned by: | leif |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | sage-5.0 |
Component: | packages: standard | Keywords: | sd32, GMP, SandyBridge, Westmere, yasm re2c race condition, Linux ia64 Itanium GCC 4.7.0 bug |
Cc: | justin, wbhart, jpflori | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Leif Leonhardy, Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers: | Jeroen Demeyer |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
This is a follow-up to #8664 (and a couple of other tickets).
The following new spkg is based on the latest MPIR 2.1.3 spkg, the p9 from #12131:
New spkg: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/mpir-2.4.0.p2.spkg
(Preliminary; changes not yet committed.)
mpir-2.4.0.p2 (Leif Leonhardy, Jeroen Demeyer, April 9th, 2012)
#11616 (upgrading MPIR), further fixes:
- When the first configure run (with CFLAGS unset) of MPIR fails, bail
out with an error. I am not aware of any system where MPIR fails
to configure with CFLAGS unset but succeeds with CFLAGS set.
-- Jeroen Demeyer
This implies the following simplifications:
- We no longer read CC and CFLAGS from /usr/include/gmp.h or /usr/local/include/gmp.h
- We no longer try to add -march=native, we simply use MPIR's flags.
- Extract $CC and $CFLAGS from Makefile instead of mpir.h, which is simpler and more reliable.
- Work around GCC 4.7.0 bug (compilation error) on Linux ia64 (Itanium) by almost completely disabling optimization on that platform if GCC 4.7.x is detected. This doesn't hurt much if we later rebuild MPIR with a (non- broken) GCC from the new GCC spkg. Cf. #12765.
- Do not build the C++ interface and static libraries when bootstrapping the
GCC spkg, i.e. if
SAGE_BUILD_TOOLCHAIN=yes
. (GMP/MPIR is a prerequisite for it, and MPIR will later get rebuilt with both enabled, with the newly built GCC.) Cf. #12782. - Fix a potential race condition in yasm's build by patching the re2c source. Cf. #11844.
- Added
quote_asm.patch
to add proper quoting to the m4 in .asm files. - Add "
patch
loop" to apply any patches (*.patch
) located inpatches/
. Use this to patch gmp-h.in instead of copying the file. - Minor clean-up; e.g. redirect error messages and warnings to
stderr
, quote parameter to--libdir
, add some comments and messages, also save user's setting ofLDFLAGS
andABI
.
mpir-2.4.0.p1 (Leif Leonhardy, March 21st, 2012)
- Upstream upgrade to MPIR 2.4.0 (#11616). The 2.4.0.p0 spkg isn't in this history, as it was based on the 2.1.3.p4 spkg, i.e., is "on another branch", and never got merged into Sage.
- Remove forcing a sequential
make install
again, since the potential race condition was fixed in MPIR 2.1.4. - Fix
.hgtags
, which contained duplicate entries, and was missing others.
This fixes also:
- #11844: a potential race condition due to yasm when building MPIR in parallel. We've never run into this [before] though. The MPIR 2.4.0.p2 spkg now includes a patch to upstream fixing that.
- #12782: when building MPIR to bootstrap GCC (i.e. when SAGE_BUILD_TOOLCHAIN=yes), do not build the C++ interface (and not the static library). This would allow to build Sage on systems which have a C compiler but not a C++ compiler.
Some old spkgs:
- http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/leif/Sage/spkgs/mpir-2.4.0.p1.spkg (based on 2.1.3.p9)
md5sum:0d88b7dfe358bb429a5a9aa3a3b4b00b mpir-2.4.0.p1.spkg
- http://spkg-upload.googlecode.com/files/mpir-2.3.1.p0.spkg (based on 2.1.3.p4)
md5sum:ff0104e302611e49604a1c4ead97cbf4 mpir-2.3.1.p0.spkg
- http://spkg-upload.googlecode.com/files/mpir-2.4.0.p0.spkg (based on 2.1.3.p4)
md5sum:98e04aa43ceef04d83574f0ee8e152fc mpir-2.4.0.p0.spkg
You may want to give both of them a try, although the former is just intended as a "fallback" spkg in case problems introduced in the latter should arise.
mpir-2.4.0.p0 (Leif Leonhardy, July 21st, 2011)
- Upstream upgrade to MPIR 2.4.0 (#11616).
mpir-2.3.1.p0 (Leif Leonhardy, July 20th, 2011)
- Upstream upgrade to MPIR 2.3.1 (#11616).
- Clean up .hgtags.
mpir-2.1.3.p4 (Leif Leonhardy, July 19th, 2011)
- #8664: Upgrade Sage's MPIR spkg to version 2.1.3
...
The list of changes between MPIR 2.1.3 (more precisely, 2.1.1) and MPIR 2.4.0 is fairly long, so I haven't put them into the description, but attached them in a plain text file.
For instructions on how to install / test the spkgs see also #8664. It is sufficient to just
- copy the spkg into
$SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard/
, then
- run
(or omit
$ env SAGE_UPGRADING=yes make build
build
to also rebuild the documentation in the samemake
run).
To run just MPIR's test suite, you can reinstall the spkg with SAGE_CHECK=yes
:
$ env SAGE_CHECK=yes ./sage -f spkg/standard/mpir-<version>.spkg
Or, if you haven't yet installed the spkg (but copied it into $SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard/
as mentioned above), do:
$ env SAGE_CHECK=yes ./sage -i spkg/standard/mpir-<version>.spkg $ env SAGE_UPGRADING=yes make build # rebuilds all dependent packages
Afterwards you can run make doc
to (re)build the documentation, and / or make ptestlong
to run Sage's full test suite in parallel.
Change History (49)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
Changed 11 years ago by
comment:2 follow-up: ↓ 3 Changed 11 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Status changed from new to needs_review
Setting this to "needs review" since the MPIR 2.1.3.p4 from #8664 got positive review again, though so far only by a single reviewer.
The current packages are mainly meant for testing the new upstream releases, hopefully on a variety of platforms supported by Sage; some improvements or changes to Sage's part will most probably follow.
It would just be nice to relatively early know whether any of them (more important, MPIR 2.4.0) causes any problems on one of our platforms. (MPIR 2.5.0 is scheduled for September 1st, which isn't that far...)
comment:3 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to leif:
(MPIR 2.5.0 is scheduled for September 1st, which isn't that far...)
News from mpir-devel:
"The release date for MPIR-2.5 was penciled in for 1st Sept, however we have decided to put it back a month to 1st Oct to allow us to get some more code in this release rather than wait for the MPIR-2.6 release on 1st Dec."
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by
I've successfully built and tested sage using the 2.4.0.p0 spkg on skynet/eno. I'm currently building/testing on some other machines as well (although, I don't have access to a ppc mac, so I can't help in that regard).
comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by
Hmm, well I'm getting some random test failures on sage.math and skynet/iras with 2.4.0.p0. I'll try again with 2.3.1.p0 and report back.
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by
- Keywords sd32 added
comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
Added a reference to #11844 (potential race condition due to yasm when building MPIR in parallel).
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
Added a note on the need to set ABI=32
on 64-bit machines running 32-bit operating systems. (The same is true for the already merged MPIR 2.1.3.p4 spkg.)
Also added a reference to #9858; FLINT 1.5.0's test suite won't build with any of the MPIR 2.x spkgs because it uses deprecated functions, and updated the installation instructions.
comment:10 Changed 11 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
- Work issues set to Rebase the spkg(s) on the MPIR 2.1.3.p5 spkg from #11896.
comment:11 Changed 11 years ago by
- Dependencies #8664 #5847 deleted
- Description modified (diff)
- Work issues changed from Rebase the spkg(s) on the MPIR 2.1.3.p5 spkg from #11896. to Rebase the spkg(s) on the MPIR 2.1.3.p7 spkg from #11964
comment:12 Changed 10 years ago by
- Work issues changed from Rebase the spkg(s) on the MPIR 2.1.3.p7 spkg from #11964 to Rebase the spkg(s) on the MPIR 2.1.3.p9 spkg from #12131
comment:13 Changed 10 years ago by
MPIR 2.5.1 has been released on March 11th. We could also give that a try, although 2.4.0 has IMHO been tested a lot and didn't raise any problems within Sage, AFAIK, at least apparently not reproducible ones.
comment:14 Changed 10 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
- Work issues Rebase the spkg(s) on the MPIR 2.1.3.p9 spkg from #12131 deleted
It's not unlikely that I'll soon provide an MPIR 2.4.0.p2 spkg, also fixing a potential race condition in the yasm
build, as well as an "experimental" MPIR 2.5.1 spkg.
Please build, test, and review!
comment:15 Changed 10 years ago by
The following can be removed now:
# The Yasm build uses PYTHON from the environment to find python, so unset # it since the setting from 'spkg/standard/newest_version' confuses it: unset PYTHON # This can be removed once #10492 has been merged, which turns the "package # version" environment variables into solely `make` variables, such that the # (shell) environment does no longer get polluted.
Also: do you feel like adding a work-around for #12765:
# Work around a bug in GCC 4.7.0 on ia64: # http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 if [ "`uname -m`" = ia64 ] && [ "`testcc.sh $CC`" = GCC ] ; then if $CC -dumpversion | grep >/dev/null '^4\.7\.0$' ; then echo >&2 "Warning: Working around bug in gcc 4.7.0" CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O0" fi fi
After sage-5.0.beta12 is released, I plan to test this spkg on the buildbots.
comment:16 Changed 10 years ago by
Also: could you use patch
for patching? Looking at patches/gmp-h.in.diff
, there is no need for a conditional patch. The patch will only actually do something if __SUNPRO_CC
is defined.
comment:17 follow-up: ↓ 18 Changed 10 years ago by
Note that I have a mpir-2.1.3.p10 at #12782, we should coordinate somehow.
comment:18 in reply to: ↑ 17 ; follow-up: ↓ 19 Changed 10 years ago by
comment:19 in reply to: ↑ 18 Changed 10 years ago by
comment:20 follow-up: ↓ 21 Changed 10 years ago by
If you're creating a new spkg anyway, could you incorporate my changes from #12782?
comment:21 in reply to: ↑ 20 ; follow-up: ↓ 22 Changed 10 years ago by
comment:22 in reply to: ↑ 21 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to leif:
Replying to jdemeyer:
If you're creating a new spkg anyway, could you incorporate my changes from #12782?
Yes, although I kept the
unset PYTHON
, since it is safe and otherwise doesn't hurt.
We can also skip building a static library when building just for GCC in the first place I think.
Changed 10 years ago by
Diff between the previous spkg in Sage and my new p1 spkg. For reference / review only.
comment:23 Changed 10 years ago by
- Cc justin added
- Description modified (diff)
- Keywords yasm re2c race condition Linux ia64 Itanium GCC 4.7.0 bug added
I've uploaded a second, p2 spkg with further fixes, also incorporating [the] changes from / for
- #11844 (potential race condition in
yasm
build), - #12765 (build error on Linux ia64 (Itanium) with GCC 4.7.0, which is a GCC bug),
- #12782 (build MPIR without C++ interface [and without static libraries] when bootstrapping the GCC spkg),
configure
error with the GCC spkg on MacOS X (on a Core i7 with AVX), as reported on sage-release.
See the changelog entries in the description and the attached diffs for details and further changes.
The p2 is still somewhat preliminary (subject to further testing), although I don't expectTM further changes to be necessary, despite that haven't committed the changes yet.
comment:24 Changed 10 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:25 Changed 10 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:26 follow-up: ↓ 27 Changed 10 years ago by
Why don't you simply remove lines 179--189 regarding PYTHON? I don't think it serves any purpose anymore. Also, it shouldn't be needed for upgrades since PYTHON
is only set by the old spkg/install
and spkg/install
is always immediately upgraded.
comment:27 in reply to: ↑ 26 ; follow-up: ↓ 28 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to jdemeyer:
Why don't you simply remove lines 179--189 regarding PYTHON? I don't think it serves any purpose anymore.
It does, because occasionally people (try to) install newer MPIR spkgs into older (e.g. 4.8) Sage installations. And doesn't hurt anyway, just makes Sage more robust.
comment:28 in reply to: ↑ 27 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to leif:
It does, because occasionally people (try to) install newer MPIR spkgs into older (e.g. 4.8) Sage installations. And doesn't hurt anyway
It does hurt at least a little simply because it makes spkg-install
and SPKG.txt
larger than needed. I would remove it (but I'm not setting the ticket to needs_work for this).
comment:29 Changed 10 years ago by
Also: could you use patch
for patching also the file gmp-h.in
unconditionally? I think having both patches and copied files is just asking for trouble.
comment:30 follow-up: ↓ 31 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to jdemeyer:
Replying to leif:
It does, because occasionally people (try to) install newer MPIR spkgs into older (e.g. 4.8) Sage installations. And doesn't hurt anyway
It does hurt at least a little simply because it makes
spkg-install
andSPKG.txt
larger than needed. I would remove it (but I'm not setting the ticket to needs_work for this).
Of course. But regarding such, I wouldn't have opened dozens of tickets and touched as many spkgs for the "newer autotools --libdir
issue"; a single symbolic link from $SAGE_LOCAL/lib64
to ./lib
would have sufficed, as we don't mix 32- and 64-bit builds anyway. IIRC someone now wants to create the lib64
directory (or a link?)...
comment:31 in reply to: ↑ 30 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to leif:
But regarding such, I wouldn't have opened dozens of tickets and touched as many spkgs for the "newer autotools
--libdir
issue";
Agreed, I don't think we went with the best solution for that.
comment:32 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to jdemeyer:
Also: could you use
patch
for patching also the filegmp-h.in
unconditionally? I think having both patches and copied files is just asking for trouble.
I don't think it's asking for trouble, but see the Special Update/Build Instructions / TODO.
I so far was just too lazy, and -- more important -- didn't want to remove Dave's messages and comments... ;-)
comment:33 follow-up: ↓ 35 Changed 10 years ago by
Concerning __GMP_CC
and __GMP_CFLAGS
: how about simply running the preprocessor on
#include "$header_file" sage_gmp_cc=__GMP_CC
and then sed
ding out the last line?
comment:34 Changed 10 years ago by
Leif: leave your package as it is. I might make a reviewer patch fixing a few small things.
comment:35 in reply to: ↑ 33 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to jdemeyer:
Concerning
__GMP_CC
and__GMP_CFLAGS
: how about simply running the preprocessor on#include "$header_file" sage_gmp_cc=__GMP_CCand then
sed
ding out the last line?
Well, that has a couple of pitfalls as well, since such headers contain a lot, have conditional parts, and usually include other files, such that one would probably have to set up include directories as well as potentially preprocessor variables, too. sed
is faster and easier; I could also use [e]grep
(and "postprocess" its output), although I prefer the way it's made now.
comment:36 Changed 10 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
This fails on hawk (OpenSolaris? 06.2009-32), I'll investigate:
m4 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -DOPERATION_popcount -DPIC popcount.asm >tmp-popcount.s libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_perfect_square_p -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c perfect_square_p.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/perfect_square_p.o libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_bdivmod -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c bdivmod.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/bdivmod.o /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo gcd | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o gcd.lo gcd.c m4 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -DOPERATION_hamdist -DPIC hamdist.asm >tmp-hamdist.s libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_gcd -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c gcd.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gcd.o libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_perfect_square_p -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c perfect_square_p.c -o perfect_square_p.o >/dev/null 2>&1 /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo gcd_1 | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o gcd_1.lo gcd_1.c libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_bdivmod -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c bdivmod.c -o bdivmod.o >/dev/null 2>&1 libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_gcd_1 -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c gcd_1.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gcd_1.o /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo gcdext | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o gcdext.lo gcdext.c /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo tdiv_qr | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o tdiv_qr.lo tdiv_qr.c /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo jacobi_base | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o jacobi_base.lo jacobi_base.c libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_gcd_1 -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c gcd_1.c -o gcd_1.o >/dev/null 2>&1 libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_gcdext -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c gcdext.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gcdext.o libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_tdiv_qr -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c tdiv_qr.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/tdiv_qr.o libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_jacobi_base -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c jacobi_base.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/jacobi_base.o /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo get_d | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o get_d.lo get_d.c libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_gcd -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c gcd.c -o gcd.o >/dev/null 2>&1 m4:hamdist.asm:41 bad macro name define(,1) libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_get_d -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c get_d.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/get_d.o /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo mullow_n | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o mullow_n.lo mullow_n.c /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo mulhigh_n | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o mulhigh_n.lo mulhigh_n.c libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_jacobi_base -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c jacobi_base.c -o jacobi_base.o >/dev/null 2>&1 libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_mullow_n -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c mullow_n.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/mullow_n.o m4:popcount.asm:41 bad macro name define(,1) make[4]: *** [popcount.lo] Error 1 /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo mullow_n_basecase | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o mullow_n_basecase.lo mullow_n_basecase.c libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_mulhigh_n -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c mulhigh_n.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/mulhigh_n.o libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_mullow_n_basecase -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c mullow_n_basecase.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/mullow_n_basecase.o libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_get_d -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c get_d.c -o get_d.o >/dev/null 2>&1 /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo mullow_basecase | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o mullow_basecase.lo mullow_basecase.c libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_mullow_n -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c mullow_n.c -o mullow_n.o >/dev/null 2>&1 /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo redc_1 | sed 's/_$//'` -m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -c -o redc_1.lo redc_1.c make[4]: *** [hamdist.lo] Error 1
comment:37 Changed 10 years ago by
- Cc wbhart added
Looks like an upstream bug to me: they write
define(OPERATION_popcount, 1)
when they probably mean
define(`OPERATION_popcount', 1)
comment:38 Changed 10 years ago by
Reported this m4 quoting bug to mpir-devel.
comment:39 Changed 10 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:40 Changed 10 years ago by
It's much simpler to read CC and CFLAGS from Makefile, so I'll make that change.
comment:41 Changed 10 years ago by
I'm confused. Why are we reading /usr/include/gmp.h
???
comment:42 Changed 10 years ago by
It looks like the flags from /usr/include/gmp.h are only used when the flags from MPIR could not be read. But that means that ./configure failed, so we won't be able to build anyway...
comment:43 Changed 10 years ago by
Work in progress, based on your .p2: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/mpir-2.4.0.p2.spkg
comment:44 Changed 10 years ago by
- Priority changed from major to blocker
- Reviewers set to Jeroen Demeyer
comment:45 Changed 10 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:46 Changed 10 years ago by
Leif, I simplified the spkg-install by bailing out with an error if the first configure run fails. This means I could remove the part which reads CC/CFLAGS from /usr/include/gmp.h and the part which tries to add -march=native.
The new spkg was tested with success on: bsd (OS X 10.6 x86_64), hawk (OpenSolaris x86 32bit), boxen (Linux x86_64), moufang (OS X 10.4 ppc), silius (Linux ppc), silius (Linux ppc64), cleo (Linux ia64 with GCC-4.7.0).
comment:47 Changed 10 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
Note that some changes between 2.1.1 and 2.1.4 may be missing (documented elsewhere, i.e. at least on
mpir-devel
I think). The segfault was fixed in 2.1.3, the race condition in 2.1.4.